Good Morning,
I could use clarification on a couple of things. Some help would be great as I am spending a lot of time and energy trying to help people see what’s happening and calling people to action. I can see the tide turning and hope you all are doing the same. Keep your heads up, we are winning the arguments if we enter them.
Anyway, if you could help me with answers these questions I’d appreciate it.
- After an election happens, does fraud have to be proven in order for the result to stand, or if it can’t be proven that there wasn’t fraud should the result not stand? I remember being told it was the latter, and if so I think this should inform our arguments. People in think Biden won are under the impression that I need evidence that shows otherwise and I don’t believe that is the case. A source or good explanation here would be great.
- I brought up the contrast between Scheller and Vindman yesterday, and was told that Vindman followed the law and that’s why he was able to keep his job despite compromising his command. I was under the impression that if you compromise your command you are removed from your job, regardless as to whether you are following the law and even if you are doing the right thing (not saying he is). Can someone please advise on why Vindman should have been removed, if he should have?
- Speaking of Scheller, his argument is essentially that orders given were so obviously bad that someone in the chain of command should have refused. What is the line between the expectation that orders are followed, and the idea that a soldier has a responsibility to not follow orders that will have a catastrophic outcome?
I would appreciate any help and engagement I can get on this. We need to win the arguments in our circles and to get people moving in the right direction. I suggest we help one another as much as possible.
Thanks!