Debate 3 categories of countries/cultures

[fschmidt]

Broadly speaking there are 3 categories of countries/cultures:

1. Poor - Good for finding a wife, bad for living. In poor countries, women actually value a reliable provider. Psychopaths aren't reliable, so they lose value in these countries. And women have a motive not to be sluts in order to increase their value to providers.

2. Rich, low illegitimacy rate - Good for living, wife options vary. Low illegitimacy rate means responsible people who value quality, and it means no dysgenics. It also means no psychopathic reproduction, so psychopaths don't have a significant sexual advantage. These are the only suitable places to live. But women don't need a provider, so whether a country/culture works for finding a wife just depends on whether you appeal to the local women.

3. Rich, high illegitimacy rate - Only good for psychopaths, bad for everyone else. All women are sluts seeking psychopaths. Quality is hated and society is dysfunctional. Never in human history have such horrible cultures existed because they simply would have collapsed due to dysfunctionality, but now technology sustains them. But this is temporary and they will collapse eventually. Anyone who cannot act like a psychopath should leave such countries/cultures.

 

[TheFiend]

Broadly speaking there are 3 categories of countries/cultures:

1. Poor - Good for finding a wife, bad for living. In poor countries, women actually value a reliable provider. Psychopaths aren't reliable, so they lose value in these countries. And women have a motive not to be sluts in order to increase their value to providers.

Historically, some of the most successful "providers" in unstable or poor regions are warlords, cartel leaders, and corrupt kleptocrats, essentially a who’s-who of psychopathy.

The idea that poverty acts as a jerk-filter is hilarious, usually, it just makes the jerks better at hoarding the grain.

 

[fschmidt]

Historically, some of the most successful "providers" in unstable or poor regions are warlords, cartel leaders, and corrupt kleptocrats, essentially a who’s-who of psychopathy.

The idea that poverty acts as a jerk-filter is hilarious, usually, it just makes the jerks better at hoarding the grain.

Warlords and cartel leaders are typically less psychopathic than your average modern scum. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy_Checklist for what psychopathy means. Trump is pretty much a poster child for psychopathy.

You also seem to totally miss my point. A provider is a guy who will stick around. So some psychopathic kleptocrat who will just dump the woman isn't going to have as much appeal in a poor country. But in rich degenerate countries, women don't care because the government supports them. So they just look for thrills with the worst men.