LAC Vol.2 New Fraqqle Rock thread

Law Abiding Citizens second volume.
I like how Trump casually drops that the Iran's new leader is a Longhorn fan.

LOL.

BTW, Iran's military has done reasonably well considering their Ayotollla spends all day sucking cack.
 
1774631542177.png

1774631551923.png

1774631599394.png
 

Terrence K Williams



Blocked traffic to pray — even with 82 mosques in Philadelphia.
There are 82 mosques in the city. But this big group of Muslims still shut down the streets.
They put prayer mats on the road and blocked traffic so they could pray right there in the middle of the day. Cars had to stop. People got down on the ground to pray on the asphalt.
All this instead of just going inside one of the many mosques nearby. This keeps happening in parts of Philly and other cities. When the mosques fill up for Friday prayers, they take over the streets and mess up traffic for everyone else.
How is this okay ?
1774640779122.png

1774641478550.png
 
Last edited:


Hello Senator Thune, At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP. Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept. You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to. You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to. You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to. Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats. Let's be precise about what you did:1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer. 2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM. 3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding. The precedent you set: You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. The 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins. But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered:• Voice vote to avoid accountability• Empty chamber to avoid debate• Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny• Immediate recess to avoid questions. You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one. What you've actually accomplished: Democrats demanded ICE restrictions.
They got ICE defunded. Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded. And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning.
The question you should answer:
Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM? Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record? You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like.
Here's my message: We saw it anyway. Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome.
Own it.

She should have closed this rebuke with “you fuc&ing pathetic sellout loser”
 
Last edited:
I know we know

Ken Blackwell
🚨BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard Drops Declassified Intel Pointing to Ukraine Aid Pipeline Into Biden Campaign🚨

There’s a story out right now that should be dominating the national conversation, and instead it’s being handled like something people are afraid to touch.

Declassified intelligence shows that U.S. agencies intercepted communications inside the Ukrainian government in 2022 discussing a plan to reroute American taxpayer money. These were intelligence intercepts, not speculation.

The conversations focused on using U.S.-funded clean energy projects as the vehicle. Money comes in labeled as infrastructure aid, gets distributed through layers of contracts and subcontractors, and then gets redirected elsewhere.

The number discussed in those communications is staggering. As much as ninety percent of the funds being shifted away from their stated purpose and toward political activity tied to the 2024 election cycle and Biden-aligned efforts.

Follow the chain. Congress approves funding. Taxpayer money goes overseas under the banner of rebuilding and energy development. That money moves through a network of entities, including some based in the United States, and becomes difficult to trace in any meaningful way.

That kind of structure requires planning and coordination. It does not happen by accident.

The reporting also describes discussions referencing individuals connected to USAID operations in Kyiv. If that detail holds up, this is not just about a foreign government attempting something improper. It raises questions about whether parts of an American-funded system were involved.

What makes this harder to ignore is the timing. These intercepts date back to 2022, well before the 2024 election cycle was fully underway. There was time to examine this, track the money, and determine whether the plan was real.

According to officials who later reviewed the material, there is no clear evidence that this triggered a serious investigation at the time. No visible urgency. No aggressive effort to follow the money.

That silence matters.

For years, Americans have been told that foreign influence in elections is one of the most serious threats the country faces. Entire investigations have been launched over far less.

Here, you have intercepted communications laying out a potential financial pathway in detail, and the response appears to have been minimal.

Only recently has the Director of National Intelligence ordered a review to determine whether any of this was carried out and whether it should be referred for a criminal investigation. That review is happening after the election cycle has already passed.

Even if this turns out to be overstated or incomplete, the standard should have been immediate scrutiny.

This is where trust starts to break down. Not just because of what may have been discussed, but because of how it was handled.

If this is wrong, then show it. Walk through the intercepts, the context, and the financial flows in the open.

If there is substance to it, even in part, then this is far bigger than a campaign controversy. It would mean taxpayer money moved through international programs and potentially fed back into domestic politics.

Tulsi Gabbard is walking straight into territory most people in Washington avoid for a reason. This is not a polite policy disagreement. This is the kind of disclosure that puts a target on your back.

She is forcing questions into the open that powerful people would prefer never be asked, let alone answered. That takes real courage.

Pray for Tulsi.

Pray for her safety.

Pray for her protection as she continues to expose what’s happening behind the scenes.

God bless Tulsi! 🙏🏾
1774659993371.png
 

Latest

Support Free Speech

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$890.17
Back
Top Bottom