That may sound good in theory, but I believe in the concept of innocent until proven guilty. I think that the mentally ill should be put in mental institutions.
www.usresisters.com
But the ones we hear nonstop about and they try using as justification for further violation of our 2A Rights, are mostly in the gun free zones. Schools churches concerts festivals are all gun free zones.
If you see someone pull a gun and start shooting people, odds are they are guilty.
Churches, concerts, and festivals are definitely not gun free zones in my state.
Under my plan, the mentally ill wouldn't have a gun because the moment they started talking shit, they would be detained, evaluated and put into a mental facility before they could shoot someone or run them over with a car... or stick a knife into them, etc., etc.
So what you are saying is that rights can be taken, or not allowed for certain people, thus the 2A is not inalienable/unalienable or absolute as you claim. You are the one that claims the 2A "shall not be infringed", yet here you are infringing the rights of certain people, in this case the mentally ill.
Temper, temper, maybe you should turn yourself in for threatening others, kinda like how your typing outruns your mouth. imjusayn
He knows that no right is absolute but he can’t walk away from the gaslighting.
He won't use Heller, he uses out of context phrases from cases that he thinks confirms his narrative of "absolute" and "unalienable". He's not gaslighting, he's truly this inept.He knows that no right is absolute but he can’t walk away from the gaslighting.
District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitutionprotects an individual's right to keep and bear arms—unconnected with service in a militia—for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.[1] It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that certain restrictions on guns and gun ownership were permissible. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or whether the right was only intended for state militias.[2]
Telling you the truth is not gaslighting you. I addressed Heller on resisters just a couple of weeks ago AND in this context:He knows that no right is absolute but he can’t walk away from the gaslighting.
District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitutionprotects an individual's right to keep and bear arms—unconnected with service in a militia—for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.[1] It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that certain restrictions on guns and gun ownership were permissible. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or whether the right was only intended for state militias.[2]
And there it is. He wants the mentally ill to be denied the right, not just from being allowed to posses a firearm, but also wants to deprive them of their freedom as stated higher in this thread, and now claims the 14A was illegally ratified to say his claim of the 2A is unalienable and shall not be infringed.Telling you the truth is not gaslighting you. I addressed Heller on resisters just a couple of weeks ago AND in this context:
Unalienable OR Inalienable - it matters | RESISTERS FORUM
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the presisters.freeforums.net
You seem oblivious to the fact that the courts define words to their liking. That is pretty much what happened in Heller. They were forced to use the word unlimited because it had not been legally defined in the context of Rights and their relevance in light of the illegally ratified Fourteenth Amendment.
What do we have here if not two cunty birds of a feather gaslighting together.
#TeamWork
Aawww, how cute, do you wanna join the club? SMFH
Probably should avoid taddling on ya selves within the actual taddles aye—although it ain't gonna help much coz both ya'z projections are kinda obvious af anyways. At least ya trying though.
Yeah sure, why knot aye...
