Jews are the direct descendants of Satan

In the old world books were the cognative disadence centers, until they were burned, not once not twice but hundreds of times, either for the lies that they were or the truths they actually were.
Another example of old world control.
And so today we have more than just books. Today we have newspapers, movies, sports, government, science and religion all competing for population control.
And who's main agenda is pop control?
Jews.
And hasn't this all been done b4? Rise fall, rise fall. Countless.
Now is that bc humans are just as flawed as the first man still or have we been conditioned for this perpetual failure?
In my mind, there is no way in hell that humans are destined to be fuck ups.
In my mind, humans are supposed to be exploring until the end of time.
Time Another fabrication for man to explain the unknown.
The ancients sure &tf didn't believe in time the way modern society does.
But I guess until each individual can decifer the vails in which they were created to be, the 1's Who can clearly see, clearly see it.
And those who truly hear, hear what is being said. And not what's being said by man.
So when 1 such as this speaks, people turn not only their eyes and ears but their language becomes scattered to the nothingness that is modern reality.
 
flawed?
ngga ur white believing in a book derived from a jew. king James was a fucking jew who hunted demons trying to be the other king jew Solomon.
jews who want to control the world also want to control what u think.
and u just proved that unequivocally.
i don't believe shit abt shit when it comes to humans.
humans ain't got shit right since the beginning of time.
ur all jews in my book.
foh with all that bullshit ngga.

What does me being white have to do with the price of rice in China?

Are you one of those idiots that think the world was built by blacks and white people were created by Jacob (Yakub) out of spite and programmed to kill blacks?

And that blacks are the real Israelites? What has black culture ever done that helped humanity “nigga” 🙄🙄

Oh, and if Cain is the son of Lucifer, a fallen angel, why wasn’t he a giant you moron?
 
Last edited:
Christianity (the Bible) was the first thing I ever studied outside of school subjects. I even ran away several times for the seemingly safe aspect of church. I still remember all the Tuesday lectures reverend Al had at Alpine Ave Baptist Church. Al may have been questioning his faith but it called me to explore mine. The same man who told high school kids to go home they couldn't hang out at the church just to skip school, all just for those same bitches to say Rev Al did sum thing to them. The new church that took over that bulding was City team ministries & the pastor wasn't ever seen except for Sundays.
He was a real weird fuck, even his kids said so.
I took several things to heart before my mind was even ever exposed to the truths abt life:
No man, no idol b4 the lord & that as much as I trusted the Bible up until then, I just still couldn't bc of the words of the Bible itself, as I watched life itself irl.
And by that I mean:
How was Adam the only man if he was from the land of Nod that was inhabited by other beings & creatures? How was this my family if none of them actually wanted me?
How was a father supposed to sacrifice his own son for redemption but then decides his stepson shld be that sacrifice? Why wld my own family acknowledge me & yet treat me worse than a stepchild?
As I grew older watching life tell me the truth I began to ask how a book cld say that if u just love for God the rewards were worth the mortal struggle, if Life in fact had no time for those words?
Then I spent abt 4 years deep diving into reading the Bible again in lock up. I also read the Torah, talmude and Koran.
And thats when I knew religion was all shit.
Then I learned abt Hinduism, taoism and Buddhism. And that sparked my fullest interests in history.
And that was the triple slam on the hault button for me.
Once I knew history was a real lie, I cldnt ever believe religion, any of them.
So to sit here and tell me that any religious context is the right one, knowing history is a fabrication, I look at u as the Ultimate devil's fool.
It's a fools errand to give/put your trusts in a book or man that wld make a mockery of U or leave it all up to u still.
Jesus told u not to worship him but bc some oligarch leader of a destroyed civilization told U to do so, u do.
Buddha said the same thing just differently.
Confucious also said similar things abt worshipping or following sum thing or any1 other than the cosmic force within u.
And another glimmering example of this is, space.
The book says it's flat but many Christians still have faith that sumthing else is out there but only what he is told is out there.
The Book says there is sumthing more out there but it's not what the book says it is.
Abt the only true thing in the Bible is the unknown and the Bible proves that time and time again.
Religion is just as contradicting as science and reality.
So while in reality u have a book abt how to obtain salvation it's only at the behest of another.
And who is that other? Jesus? Moe or the devil, that's all we're allowed while still being told all religions actually follow the same route to one end.
I'm under the full understanding that religion was invented for control, like mental health.
So where as u can believe in Jesus u can't go as so far as calling ur self a prophet.
As if all prophecy ended with Jesus.
A figure invented to combat 1 specific pagan occult.
[at the food bank, daughter asking abt her truck, will be back later]
I can't believe we're supposed to follow a book derived from the old world rulers who wanted to control the population.
And population control has evolved from civilizations & societies to religions, sciences to today which is financially.
A personal example of this is, knowing a pastor who devishly enticed married women and still demanded the weekly offering.
When that same book tells us God doesn't want any earthly offering.
So u mean to tell me even tho God thinks it's creation is worth jack shit that anything u have to offer from earth, including ur insignificant prayers (old world witches spell casting) is worthless, we must still continue to offer earthly sacrifices?
And what are we born to sacrifice today?
Everything & we still might not get into heaven, if we don't adjudicate the jews above us?
So by all accounts it wld go:
Jesus, the jews, God and then u.
Completely contradicting the entire premise of the first testiment.
U people crack me tf up.
😆
The Bible doesn't suggest Adam was the first Homo Sapien. That's one of the biggest misconceptions. According to Strong's Hebrew dictionary, Adam means:
to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:--be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

So brownoid races do not come from Adam. God does not take credit for creating them. When I realized that, the creation story makes a lot of sense.

Adam was not from the land of nod. The story goes that he was from the Garden of Eden. Cain was banished to the land of Nod, east of Eden. Nod just means wandering. The fact that Cain later built a city showed there were way more people living than just Adam and Eve. He would have been dwelling among non-white races.

The flood was not global, despite the insistence from universalists. That narrative comes from a mistranslation of the word eretz. Eretz just means land. The Bible doesn't say "the earth is flat" anywhere, nor that the world is 6,000 years old.

Jews are not Israelites, just like Mexicans are not authentically Spanish. I've seen judeo-Christians erroneously call Moses and Abraham Jews. Nowhere in scripture are they referred to as Jews.
 
Last edited:
The Bible doesn't suggest Adam was the first Homo Sapien. That's one of the biggest misconceptions. According to Strong's Hebrew dictionary, Adam means:
to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:--be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

So brownoid races do not come from Adam. God does not take credit for creating them. When I realized that, the creation story makes a lot of sense.

Adam was not from the land of nod. The story goes that he was from the Garden of Eden. Cain was banished to the land of Nod, east of Eden. Nod just means wandering. The fact that Cain later built a city showed there were way more people living than just Adam and Eve. He would have been dwelling among non-white races.

The flood was not global, despite the insistence from universalists. That narrative comes from a mistranslation of the word eretz. Eretz just means land. The Bible doesn't say "the earth is flat" anywhere, nor that the world is 6,000 years old.

Jews are not Israelites, just like Mexicans are not authentically Spanish. I've seen judeo-Christians erroneously call Moses and Abraham Jews. Nowhere in scripture are they referred to as Jews.
ok post modern Darwin 😆
 
What does me being white have to do with the price of rice in China?

Are you one of those idiots that think the world was built by blacks and white people were created by Jacob (Yakub) out of spite and programmed to kill blacks?

And that blacks are the real Israelites? What has black culture ever done that helped humanity “nigga” 🙄🙄

Oh, and if Cain is the son of Lucifer, a fallen angel, why wasn’t he a giant you moron?
Cain, satan, jesus they can all get fuct.
white is the color of most NPC's.
no body of our caliber built shit bc the ancestors they tell us abt weren't even really ours.
we are either the great grand children of the cabbage patch/incubator babies or it's all entirely a simulation.
 
The Bible doesn't suggest Adam was the first Homo Sapien. That's one of the biggest misconceptions. According to Strong's Hebrew dictionary, Adam means:
to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:--be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

So brownoid races do not come from Adam. God does not take credit for creating them. When I realized that, the creation story makes a lot of sense.

Adam was not from the land of nod. The story goes that he was from the Garden of Eden. Cain was banished to the land of Nod, east of Eden. Nod just means wandering. The fact that Cain later built a city showed there were way more people living than just Adam and Eve. He would have been dwelling among non-white races.

The flood was not global, despite the insistence from universalists. That narrative comes from a mistranslation of the word eretz. Eretz just means land. The Bible doesn't say "the earth is flat" anywhere, nor that the world is 6,000 years old.

Jews are not Israelites, just like Mexicans are not authentically Spanish. I've seen judeo-Christians erroneously call Moses and Abraham Jews. Nowhere in scripture are they referred to as Jews.
this ngga actually believes sumthing abt history.
What an NPC.
😆
 
What does me being white have to do with the price of rice in China?

Are you one of those idiots that think the world was built by blacks and white people were created by Jacob (Yakub) out of spite and programmed to kill blacks?

And that blacks are the real Israelites? What has black culture ever done that helped humanity “nigga” 🙄🙄

Oh, and if Cain is the son of Lucifer, a fallen angel, why wasn’t he a giant you moron?
The nephilim were not necessarily giants. The word nephilim comes from the Hebrew root word naphal which means to fall. So I wouldn't say Cain was for sure a giant. Only some of the nephilim were giants.
 
so why is it several key factors of what God has supposedly personally expressed to mankind been Redacted from the Bible?

To know God means u wld have to discard any and all worldly and earthly concepts and presets...

To know God means to have lived a hardened life, fret not on the trials life brings but the lesson death teaches.

&
Many instances of the Bible that I remember learning as a child have indeed completely reversed since becoming an adult.

So say 1 loves his family and yet his family does not love him, how wld 1 know God if he is always seeking the approval of the family who does not want him? By destroying his only chances at a true redemption by not discarding them and forging his own path in life.

Several biblical fictional characters were given this option & all failed to let go believing in their man-made faiths to another.

God didn't give us hope to survive whatever crap the devil make us wade thru to achieve the ultimate goal, the final destination predetermined and destined by God, death.

Bc u see, as much as we're indoctrinated to believe that life is life and death is death, that cldnt be farther from the truth.

These vessels known as homo sapiens are conductants, the aether is the static buffer & God is the full charge, that prepares us for the final experiment upon 1s psychy which is a part of a much larger collective of phsychys.

I wld venture that most need a mental health day to process this information bc the weight of the unknowns is too much to bare than actually embracing their God give freewill to explore not just this realm physical but everything beyond.

And thats the 1 part the controllers just can't dampen within our senses, especially for those cut from a completely different cloth.

The knowing that for as much that is known there is still so much more that is unknown, and that's where mankind's destiny truly rests, is the unknown.

So no matter how much crap man comes up with to explain what can't be explained the more I know mankind still doesn't know shit.

And sum times for a select few, sum earlier than others, reach a certain age, they find/figure this all out on their own.

Which is the true essence of a real man.
A man, not an "hu-man".
human is a term that is relatively new and has been edited/added into history, perpetually eroding the presents understanding of the past, which causes the future of mankind to be hindered in so many more ways tha just following a Book that's supposed 2-B a deriveration of history, spiritual historical beliefs and the present understandings of life.

But who's understandings?

Are we built to think for ourselves?

Or is that still too much to ask of man?
 
@Shrek
@1A2A
Guessing you guys are christians(?)

If so, would either/or both of you possibly be willing to consider sharing your opinions on a few queries relating to christianity? Nothing outrageous of course....🤔 perhaps mildly unconventional at most.
Just haven't been able to get answers from any AIs since the queries also relate to jew cultists.
Sure. What do you want to know. I am no expert, not sure that really exists on the topic, but I can try, as long as you are truthful, and not disingenuous.
 
The serpent was the father of Cain. This is consistent throughout the entire Bible. The only verse that contradicts it is Genesis 4:1. Genesis 4:1 is notorious for being unreadable in the original Hebrew. Genesis 3:15, Genesis 5:1, and 4 Maccabees 8 all contradict it.

The word Kenite can either mean metalsmith or a patronym from the name Cain. Kenites started off living in Canaan and Edom according to Genesis 15 and and 1 Samuel 15. Later on, they became scribes in 1 Chronicles 2.

One of the biggest myths in the Bible is that everyone except Noah's family died in the flood. That can easily be debunked because the Nephilim lived before and after the flood.

Jesus and the first Christians were not racial or religious Jews. The genealogy of Jesus shows Jesus's ancestry was entirely West Eurasian (white), while racial Jews are arabized mongrels. Jesus can't be a religious Jew because the Babylonian Talmud that Jews adhere to was written after the time of Jesus. Jesus denounced the "traditions of men" that the Pharisees and Sadducees followed. When you read the word "Jew" in the New Testament, you're actually reading "iodaios", which means Judaean in Greek. In other words, the only way they could be referred to as "Jews" is that their ancestors came from the geographical confines of Judaea.

Josephus and Strabo explained that after the Edomites were expelled from the Nabataean kingdom for committing sedition, they were allowed to live among the Judaeans as long as they converted to their religion. This made Judaea a mixed race nation. Living in Judaea during the time of Jesus was like living in Italy or Spain today where there are some people who are not racially mixed, but they are not the overwhelming majority.

Jesus believed most of the Pharisees, Sadduccees, and scribes, the ancestors of the people we call Jews today, descended from satan:

John 8:44 - You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

Context: Cain was the murderer from the beginning. Jesus wouldn't say the father of the Pharisees was the devil if it wasn't true because otherwise that would make him a false accuser or slanderer.

Matthew 12:34 - You brood of vipers! How can you speak good, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.

Context: Jesus called them vipers as a reference to their serpentine origin.

Matthew 23:35 - As a result, you will be held responsible for the murder of all godly people of all time—from the murder of righteous Abel to the murder of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you killed in the Temple between the sanctuary and the altar.

Context: Cain was the murderer of Abel.

Finally, the serpent was indeed satan.

Revelation 12:9 - This great dragon—the ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, the one deceiving the whole world—was thrown down to the earth with all his angels.
Have you personally met a dirty hook schnoz and an Irish descendant ever since the hook nose sold them?

LOST HISTORY FACT CHECK CELITIC IRISH.SLAVES BLUE EYES MF. RAFFLES FOR AN 86' FORD ESCORT FOR PARTS!
 
@Shrek
@1A2A
Guessing you guys are christians(?)

If so, would either/or both of you possibly be willing to consider sharing your opinions on a few queries relating to christianity? Nothing outrageous of course....🤔 perhaps mildly unconventional at most.
Just haven't been able to get answers from any AIs since the queries also relate to jew cultists.
So what the fuck are you going to ask?
 
Sure. What do you want to know. I am no expert, not sure that really exists on the topic, but I can try, as long as you are truthful, and not disingenuous.
Cool, thanks.

So what the fuck are you going to ask?
Sorry for keeping you waiting. I've been offline since Friday, and only just logged in.

First question I'd like to ask you, (as well as @Shrek, @AmericanViking & anyone else willing to respond), is: which specific type of Christianity do you adhere to/practice?

*According to Wikipedia, U.S. Christianity is divided into 3 primary groups:
•Protestants
•Catholics
•Mormons/LDS
With these further subdivided into at least 200 subtypes.
 
Cool, thanks.


Sorry for keeping you waiting. I've been offline since Friday, and only just logged in.

First question I'd like to ask you, (as well as @Shrek, @AmericanViking & anyone else willing to respond), is: which specific type of Christianity do you adhere to/practice?

*According to Wikipedia, U.S. Christianity is divided into 3 primary groups:
•Protestants
•Catholics
•Mormons/LDS
With these further subdivided into at least 200 subtypes.

I guess Protestant. Christian Orthodox but I don’t officially belong to a church
 
Cool, thanks.


Sorry for keeping you waiting. I've been offline since Friday, and only just logged in.

First question I'd like to ask you, (as well as @Shrek, @AmericanViking & anyone else willing to respond), is: which specific type of Christianity do you adhere to/practice?

*According to Wikipedia, U.S. Christianity is divided into 3 primary groups:
•Protestants
•Catholics
•Mormons/LDS
With these further subdivided into at least 200 subtypes.
Non-denominational, which falls into the Protestant category. But I adopt some Catholic ideas (Septuagint over Masoretic text, not dismissing the books that Luther dismissed as non-canon)
 
I guess Protestant. Christian Orthodox but I don’t officially belong to a church
Hey, by 'Christian Orthodox', are you specifically meaning a subtype of Protestantism? (as opposed to Eastern Orthodox)

(*The search results I'm getting all equate Christian Orthodox as being Eastern Orthodox and that Protestant & Christian Orthodox are two distinctly separate primary categories of Christianity.)
 
Non-denominational, which falls into the Protestant category. But I adopt some Catholic ideas (Septuagint over Masoretic text, not dismissing the books that Luther dismissed as non-canon)
Honestly, I'm astonished by how complicated Christianity seems to be.

Would it be accurate to say that you fit within the primary Christian category of Protestantism—within a subtype defined as Non-denominational?, or is non-denominational meaning to imply an undefined/independent subtype?
 
Before I can ask any of the jew related questions originally intended, I first need to establish an understanding of how all the variations of Christianity fit together and relate to one another.

It'd be a piece of cake if there was only 1 singular Christianity....but apparently there's 6 primary types and over 33,000 subtypes worldwide.
 
Before I can ask any of the jew related questions originally intended, I first need to establish an understanding of how all the variations of Christianity fit together and relate to one another.

It'd be a piece of cake if there was only 1 singular Christianity....but apparently there's 6 primary types and over 33,000 subtypes worldwide.
sure 🤔 will the real...
slim Shady please stand up
a44nl8.jpg

😆
 
Before I can ask any of the jew related questions originally intended, I first need to establish an understanding of how all the variations of Christianity fit together and relate to one another.

It'd be a piece of cake if there was only 1 singular Christianity....but apparently there's 6 primary types and over 33,000 subtypes worldwide.
& thats y its not 2b trusted, just like anything else that man has invented in order to understand all the unknowns we were given 2 figure this bs called life out.
 
According to Wikipedia
If you get your questions based on Wiki, I suggest you gain your knowledge base elsewhere.....like maybe the bible.
astonished by how complicated Christianity seems to be
I share the astonishment. But really, the one real enemy of Christianity, are as you elude to, most "Christians" themselves, perhaps equal to those who use bad apples, to condemn the whole apple tree.

Denominations are a tribal human thing, they have no basis, nor do they hold sway. In the eyes of Jesus, there are the faithful, and those who are not. This is made clear.

I find it interesting: those to whom have many questions about this topic, mostly seem to ask pointed questions, to people they do not know, then argue on points that they don't understand, while at the same time, refusing to read the bible or the word of Jesus.
 
Ah, I'm with you now.

Apologies for this next potentially stupid question: Does non-denominational mean the same as not officially belonging to a church?

No. It’s a church with a mixed Protestant ideology. Look at millennialism theology and replacement theology and go from there. They think there’s still a special role for Jews and they are the chosen. Jews love using this idea because it makes them special. I refuse to worship Jews

I disagree, the Israelites are the chosen. All Jews are Israelites but not all Israelites are Jews. Anyone that accepts Christ becomes grafted into being an Israelite and enters the covenant. Jews are out of covenant.

If anyone argues look at Jericho. The woman wasn’t Israelite but she was grafted in.

The covenant is with Christians, the lost sheep, not Jews. Look up Ephraim and Manasseh. Israel passed the covenant with God to them. Jews are the goy they hate.

Super simplistic there.
 
Last edited:
No. It’s a church with a mixed Protestant ideology. Look at millennialism theology and replacement theology and go from there. They think there’s still a special role for Jews and they are the chosen. Jews love using this idea because it makes them special. I refuse to worship Jews

I disagree, the Israelites are the chosen. All Jews are Israelites but not all Israelites are Jews. Anyone that accepts Christ becomes grafted into being an Israelite and enters the covenant. Jews are out of covenant.

If anyone argues look at Jericho. The woman wasn’t Israelite but she was grafted in.

The covenant is with Christians, the lost sheep, not Jews. Look up Ephraim and Manasseh. Israel passed the covenant with God to them. Jews are the goy they hate.

Super simplistic there.
🤔sounds like he'd settle ur property.
🤨
😆
 
If you get your questions based on Wiki, I suggest you gain your knowledge base elsewhere.....like maybe the bible.

I share the astonishment. But really, the one real enemy of Christianity, are as you elude to, most "Christians" themselves, perhaps equal to those who use bad apples, to condemn the whole apple tree.

Denominations are a tribal human thing, they have no basis, nor do they hold sway. In the eyes of Jesus, there are the faithful, and those who are not. This is made clear.

I find it interesting: those to whom have many questions about this topic, mostly seem to ask pointed questions, to people they do not know, then argue on points that they don't understand, while at the same time, refusing to read the bible or the word of Jesus.
npc all the way ☝️
I have to hang back and watch from this point
one pint too many maybe
😆
 
Last edited:
If you get your questions based on Wiki, I suggest you gain your knowledge base elsewhere.....like maybe the bible.
Yeah the only issue with relying on the bible—in this case—is that the particular information I'm seeking isn't found in the bible.

So far I still haven't been able to find a straightforward list or even just a simple visual map showing how all the different types of christianity relate to one-another.

Best I've found is this rudimentary venn diagram for catholic, orthodox & protestant.
IMG_20250826_132724.png

I share the astonishment. But really, the one real enemy of Christianity, are as you elude to, most "Christians" themselves, perhaps equal to those who use bad apples, to condemn the whole apple tree.
Oh....🤔ahh, tbh I don't actually recall alluding to christians themselves as being the one real enemy of christianity. Are you sure it was me?
I'm more likely to just directly blame the jew cult.

Denominations are a tribal human thing, they have no basis, nor do they hold sway. In the eyes of Jesus, there are the faithful, and those who are not. This is made clear.
Of course. Although, in the realm of the living, this sort of truth doesn't seem to concern corrupt individuals at all and the apparent obscurity only provides them with convenient places to conceal themselves.

For example: zionized christians. At least some of them basically serve the jew cult while masquerading as subversive pseudo-christians. Meanwhile apparently some other types of zio-christians support the zio-jew cultists and their israel agenda but only insofar as to hasten the end times or something like that.

The denominational distinctions within christianity could be useful for identifying and distinguishing friend from foe, considering how challenging this becomes when foes can disguise themselves as/or amongst friends.
 
No. It’s a church with a mixed Protestant ideology. Look at millennialism theology and replacement theology and go from there. They think there’s still a special role for Jews and they are the chosen. Jews love using this idea because it makes them special. I refuse to worship Jews
Oh, so non-denominational pretty much refers to zionized/Scofield christian subtypes?

I disagree, the Israelites are the chosen. All Jews are Israelites but not all Israelites are Jews. Anyone that accepts Christ becomes grafted into being an Israelite and enters the covenant. Jews are out of covenant.
Yeah I'm genuinely ignorant about the whole covenant deal aye, though I vaguely recall something about the first one being established with the original israelites long before the modern jew cult ever co-optated the biblical israelite identity and equated it as it's own. I'm probably mistaken/misrecollecting, but if not, then the obvious question would be how could the first covenant be established with jews if the jew cult didn't exist until a few centuries ago. Plus, weren't the original israelites comprised of numerous tribes?

If anyone argues look at Jericho. The woman wasn’t Israelite but she was grafted in.

The covenant is with Christians, the lost sheep, not Jews. Look up Ephraim and Manasseh. Israel passed the covenant with God to them. Jews are the goy they hate.

Super simplistic there.
You're actually quite good at explaining this stuff man.
 
Yeah the only issue with relying on the bible—in this case—is that the particular information I'm seeking isn't found in the bible.

So far I still haven't been able to find a straightforward list or even just a simple visual map showing how all the different types of christianity relate to one-another.

Best I've found is this rudimentary venn diagram for catholic, orthodox & protestant.
In this context, if it is not found in the bible, then the answer may not be answerable. Many think they have the answer, but the truth is, if it is not found in the bible, you are looking at Wiki.
Oh....🤔ahh, tbh I don't actually recall alluding to christians themselves as being the one real enemy of christianity. Are you sure it was me?
No, read my words more carefully, and stop deflecting the conversation. I told you to be honest.
Of course. Although, in the realm of the living, this sort of truth doesn't seem to concern corrupt individuals at all and the apparent obscurity only provides them with convenient places to conceal themselves.

For example: zionized christians. At least some of them basically serve the jew cult while masquerading as subversive pseudo-christians. Meanwhile apparently some other types of zio-christians support the zio-jew cultists and their israel agenda but only insofar as to hasten the end times or something like that.

The denominational distinctions within christianity could be useful for identifying and distinguishing friend from foe, considering how challenging this becomes when foes can disguise themselves as/or amongst friends.
Show me any of those terms in the new testament.
Oh, so non-denominational pretty much refers to zionized/Scofield christian subtypes?
No, there are those who have true faith in Christ, and those who do not.....that is that.
 
Plus, weren't the original israelites comprised of numerous tribes?

The covenant was with Abraham, then Isaac, then Jacob (Israel), then Ephraim and Manasseh. God promised land, numerous descendants, and blessing to all nations through them. Now think which group has benefited the world the most. Also, what grip is everyone against?

Judah will always hold the scepter since David. The stone of destiny is believed to be in Scotland and every king/queen has been sworn in on it.

Jacob had 12 children. All twelve became their own tribe. Dan, Asher, Judah, Benjamin, Levi, Gad, etc.

The Israelites divided into northern Israel and southern Israel (Judah & Benjamin). The northern nation was made up of the other 10 tribes.

The northern tribes started worshiping false gods. The Assyrians came in and conquered them. God “divorced” those tribes and the Assyrians would send conquered peoples away from their homeland. Those are the 10 lost tribes.

Those tribes may have become the Scythians and many believe they are the lost sheep Yeshua came for and who would spread the word of Christ. They ended up in Europe.

There are two reasons for divorce accepted by Yahweh, adultery and leaving a non-believer. Those are allowed to remarry. The other allowed to remarry is a widow.

When He divorced the 10 tribes they were never allowed to remarry again and were out of covenant since they were non-believers and in sin.

In comes Yeshua. When He died that allowed them to “remarry” and be brought back into covenant. There’s a reason Yahweh uses marriage as an example so much in the New Testament.

Dan is out for good (most likely Scandinavian peoples) Joseph became Ephraim and Manasseh (his sons). So there are still 12 tribes but two are out of covenant (Judah and Benjamin). They’ll come back in eventually.

These are my thoughts through study. Many disagree with replacement theology in Protestantism. So definitely don’t take my word for it. You’ll have to do your own study and teach your own conclusions.
 
Last edited:

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$400.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom