I see no reason to support either the Israelis or Palestinians

Shrek

Poster
Rooting for one or the other like they're a sports team is childish. Viewing the issue like one group are the good guys and one group are the bad guys is short-sighted.

Religion and race distorts people's opinions on the issue. I hate to burst people's bubbles, but Israelis and Palestinians are not different races of people. They both descended from the Canaanites. The only difference is one follows Judaism and the other follows Islam.


The narratives like one group being the Israelites and the other is not are not true. They're not Semites either. They came from Ham, which is also what I had for dinner. Non-religious people will say, "but, the Canaanites were Semites!". Give me a break. "Semitic languages" are nothing but a construct based on the Bible, so stop using the word Semitic if you don't believe Shem existed. What you call Semitic languages were just different dialects of Akkadian, the lingua franca of the Middle East at the time. So yes, the "anti-Semite" word that's used to smear anti-Zionists is just as bogus as homophobe or Islamophobe.

I don't care if Israel "has a right to exist" when Jews like George Soros don't believe white European countries have a right to exist without mass migration.

Africans, Latin Americans, Jews, and their Middle East/North African (MENA) cousins seem to have genes that make it to where they're not even grateful when someone tries to help them out, so I don't try.

We Americans have no dog in the fight between Israel and Palestine. Any stake you imagine we have is the result of our own actions.
 
Last edited:
Rooting for one or the other like they're a sports team is childish. Viewing the issue like one group are the good guys and one group are the bad guys is short-sighted.
Yep, you're absolutely right.
IMG_20250628_212359_023.jpg
Religion and race distorts people's opinions on the issue. I hate to burst people's bubbles, but Israelis and Palestinians are not different races of people. They both descended from the Canaanites. The only difference is one follows Judaism and the other follows Islam.
Religion, yep. Race....🤔dunno if that's the right word here. Ethnicity perhaps.
IMG_20250629_122741_597.jpg
The narratives like one group being the Israelites and the other is not are not true. They're not Semites either. They came from Ham, which is also what I had for dinner. Non-religious people will say, "but, the Canaanites were Semites!". Give me a break. "Semitic languages" are nothing but a construct based on the Bible, so stop using the word Semitic if you don't believe Shem existed. What you call Semitic languages were just different dialects of Akkadian, the lingua franca of the Middle East at the time. So yes, the "anti-Semite" word that's used to smear anti-Zionists is just as bogus as homophobe or Islamophobe.
I'm non-religious. And will say, "I agree with what you're saying here. Frankly imo fuck all that irrelevant fictive shit."
IMG_20250625_000854_843.jpg
I don't care if Israel "has a right to exist" when Jews like George Soros don't believe white European countries have a right to exist without mass migration.
If that aberrant Rothschild Israeli nation state ever had a right to exist, it long since forfeited it.

Yet even if the cancerous artificial nation state of Israel were completely erased.

We'd still have to deal with the pernicious international jew cults infesting all the nations and peoples of our world.
IMG_20250625_071450_337.jpg
Africans, Latin Americans, Jews, and their Middle East/North African (MENA) cousins seem to have genes that make it to where they're not even grateful when someone tries to help them out, so I don't try.
Dysfunctionality is probably more prevalent in the mixed breeds and the lesser 3 races of Mongoloids, Australoids & Negroids than it is within the minority Caucasoid race.
IMG_20250625_064534_171.jpg
However Caucasoids are most certainly not immune to being selfish retards just like the other races of course.

We Americans have no dog in the fight between Israel and Palestine. Any stake you imagine we have is the result of our own actions.
The international jewsury cartels do though.

War = Profit

At this stage genuine Americans have absolutely nothing to gain from continuing the forever war, and everything to lose.
IMG_20250629_112818_913.jpg
Butt discontinuing prolly ain't gonna be easy. We all know what the jews are like.

If American's finally cut the leeching jew cult off from American resources.... they'll definitely start packin' massive potentially nuclear tantrums.
IMG_20250628_214008_438.jpg
 
Yep, you're absolutely right.
View attachment 235861

Religion, yep. Race....🤔dunno if that's the right word here. Ethnicity perhaps.
View attachment 235859

I'm non-religious. And will say, "I agree with what you're saying here. Frankly imo fuck all that irrelevant fictive shit."
View attachment 235863

If that aberrant Rothschild Israeli nation state ever had a right to exist, it long since forfeited it.

Yet even if the cancerous artificial nation state of Israel were completely erased.

We'd still have to deal with the pernicious international jew cults infesting all the nations and peoples of our world.
View attachment 235862

Dysfunctionality is probably more prevalent in the mixed breeds and the lesser 3 races of Mongoloids, Australoids & Negroids than it is within the minority Caucasoid race.
View attachment 235864
However Caucasoids are most certainly not immune to being selfish retards just like the other races of course.


The international jewsury cartels do though.

War = Profit

At this stage genuine Americans have absolutely nothing to gain from continuing the forever war, and everything to lose.
View attachment 235858
Butt discontinuing prolly ain't gonna be easy. We all know what the jews are like.

If American's finally cut the leeching jew cult off from American resources.... they'll definitely start packin' massive potentially nuclear tantrums.
View attachment 235860
"Religion, yep. Race....🤔dunno if that's the right word here. Ethnicity perhaps."

The meaning behind my "religion and race" remark was that there are people who will back the Israelis because they falsely think they're white, and there are people who will back the Palestinians because they think the Israelis are white. The average person thinks the majority of Israelis look like pale Ashkenazi Jews because those kinds of Jews are all over television. I'm a dual-seedline Christian, so I don't consider a 95% Caucasoid/3% Mongoloid/2% Negroid Jew to be "white."
 
Last edited:
Rooting for one or the other like they're a sports team is childish. Viewing the issue like one group are the good guys and one group are the bad guys is short-sighted.

Religion and race distorts people's opinions on the issue. I hate to burst people's bubbles, but Israelis and Palestinians are not different races of people. They both descended from the Canaanites. The only difference is one follows Judaism and the other follows Islam.


The narratives like one group being the Israelites and the other is not are not true. They're not Semites either. They came from Ham, which is also what I had for dinner. Non-religious people will say, "but, the Canaanites were Semites!". Give me a break. "Semitic languages" are nothing but a construct based on the Bible, so stop using the word Semitic if you don't believe Shem existed. What you call Semitic languages were just different dialects of Akkadian, the lingua franca of the Middle East at the time. So yes, the "anti-Semite" word that's used to smear anti-Zionists is just as bogus as homophobe or Islamophobe.

I don't care if Israel "has a right to exist" when Jews like George Soros don't believe white European countries have a right to exist without mass migration.

Africans, Latin Americans, Jews, and their Middle East/North African (MENA) cousins seem to have genes that make it to where they're not even grateful when someone tries to help them out, so I don't try.

We Americans have no dog in the fight between Israel and Palestine. Any stake you imagine we have is the result of our own actions.
Yeah I don't pull for either team. They are basically the same people just one has more worldly wealth than the others. Wall them off and let them settle their differences playground rules.
 
"Religion, yep. Race....🤔dunno if that's the right word here. Ethnicity perhaps."

My meaning behind that comment was there are people who will back the Israelis because they falsely think they're white, and there are people who will back the Palestinians because they think the Israelis are white. The average person thinks the majority of Israelis look like pale Ashkenazi Jews because those kinds of Jews are all over television. I'm a dual-seedline Christian, so I don't consider a 95% Caucasoid/3% Mongoloid 2% Negroid Jew to be "white."
Wake up white people
-Dana Carvey
 
"Religion, yep. Race....🤔dunno if that's the right word here. Ethnicity perhaps."

The meaning behind my "religion and race" remark was that there are people who will back the Israelis because they falsely think they're white, and there are people who will back the Palestinians because they think the Israelis are white. The average person thinks the majority of Israelis look like pale Ashkenazi Jews because those kinds of Jews are all over television. I'm a dual-seedline Christian, so I don't consider a 95% Caucasoid/3% Mongoloid/2% Negroid Jew to be "white."
Sure, I understand what you're saying.

There are five issues imo;
1
. Race, as a serious scientific concept, has been thoroughly subverted, smeared, discarded from the official correct think agenda, substituted with various overlapping fictive/semi-fictive concepts like genetics, ethnicity, identity, culture, religion, blackness, whiteness and such.


2. Race, as definitive term for referencing a scientific concept, is now generally just used as a rhetorical weapon by jews, zogbots, the indoctrinated masses & other ziotards.


3. I can't recall ever encountering anyone arguing for Israel, directly using race to support their case, rather instead only casting it as an offensive weapon while preferring interchangeable correct think terms & concepts in allusion to racial distinctions both defensively & offensively, like ethnicity, culture, identity, faith, belief, religion, heritage, genetics, nationality and so on.

My own interpretation of 'Race' is relatively straightforward:
•Caucasoids.​
•Mongoloids.​
•Australoids.​
•Negroids​
•And variably hybridized cross breeds.​


4. White, isn't a race either. Neither is black. These terms in this context are simply correct think approved fictive constructs that, again, merely serve as interchangeably weaponizable substitutions for wittingly or unwittingly alluding to racial distinctions without directly referring to the now discarded heretical concept of race. Eg: generalized allusions to primary caucasoids as "white", while obviously plenty of cross breeds physically appear "white" too, yet aren't primary caucasoids.


5. Unfortunately the Ashkenazi Rothschild's state of Israel was/is overwhelmingly populated by individuals of predominantly Caucasoid make-up.

Worldwide, the 3 main jew sub-groups are:
Ashkenazi (Central & Eastern European)​
Shepardi (Iberian Peninsula)​
Mizrahi (Western/Central Asia & North Africa)​

Though generally Shepardi & Mizrahi are considered one group with either title used interchangeably.
Ashkenazi are predominantly Caucasoid.​
Shepardi are a mix of various hybrid Caucasoids, Mongoloids & Negroids.​
Mizrahi are also a mix of various hybrid Caucasoids, Mongoloids & Negroids.​

So basically 2 main jew sub-groups, with the common denominator being Caucasoid blood.


Going by the 2 main jew sub-group concept, according to the Googles, the composition of all jews worldwide is roughly:
•70% Ashkenazi.​
•30% Mizrahi/Shepardi.​

And Israel's demographic composition is, according to Wiki:
•73.2% classified as jew.​
~7,208,000 + 503,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank.
•21.1% classified as Arab.​
~2,080,000 Palestinians, Druze, Circassians, Muslims, Christians, Armenians & Arabs.
•5.7% classified as other.​
~554,000 including individuals with jew ancestry but not recognized as jew by religious law, non-jew family members of jew immigrants, Christians other than Arabs & Armenians, and residents without distinct ethnic or religious categorization.

So basically Israel is roughly 75ish% jew, and the Israeli jew composition is approximately:
•45% Ashkenazi, primarily Caucasoid​
•55% Mizrahi, includes variably miscegenated Caucasoid blood.​

Which suggests Israel is predominantly occupied by individuals possessed of caucasoid blood.
 
Sure, I understand what you're saying.

There are five issues imo;
1
. Race, as a serious scientific concept, has been thoroughly subverted, smeared, discarded from the official correct think agenda, substituted with various overlapping fictive/semi-fictive concepts like genetics, ethnicity, identity, culture, religion, blackness, whiteness and such.


2. Race, as definitive term for referencing a scientific concept, is now generally just used as a rhetorical weapon by jews, zogbots, the indoctrinated masses & other ziotards.


3. I can't recall ever encountering anyone arguing for Israel, directly using race to support their case, rather instead only casting it as an offensive weapon while preferring interchangeable correct think terms & concepts in allusion to racial distinctions both defensively & offensively, like ethnicity, culture, identity, faith, belief, religion, heritage, genetics, nationality and so on.




4. White, isn't a race either. Neither is black. These terms in this context are simply correct think approved fictive constructs that, again, merely serve as interchangeably weaponizable substitutions for wittingly or unwittingly alluding to racial distinctions without directly referring to the now discarded heretical concept of race. Eg: generalized allusions to primary caucasoids as "white", while obviously plenty of cross breeds physically appear "white" too, yet aren't primary caucasoids.


5. Unfortunately the Ashkenazi Rothschild's state of Israel was/is overwhelmingly populated by individuals of predominantly Caucasoid make-up.

Worldwide, the 3 main jew sub-groups are:
Ashkenazi (Central & Eastern European)​
Shepardi (Iberian Peninsula)​
Mizrahi (Western/Central Asia & North Africa)​

Though generally Shepardi & Mizrahi are considered one group with either title used interchangeably.
Ashkenazi are predominantly Caucasoid.​
Shepardi are a mix of various hybrid Caucasoids, Mongoloids & Negroids.​
Mizrahi are also a mix of various hybrid Caucasoids, Mongoloids & Negroids.​

So basically 2 main jew sub-groups, with the common denominator being Caucasoid blood.


Going by the 2 main jew sub-group concept, according to the Googles, the composition of all jews worldwide is roughly:
•70% Ashkenazi.​
•30% Mizrahi/Shepardi.​

And Israel's demographic composition is, according to Wiki:
•73.2% classified as jew.​
~7,208,000 + 503,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank.
•21.1% classified as Arab.​
~2,080,000 Palestinians, Druze, Circassians, Muslims, Christians, Armenians & Arabs.
•5.7% classified as other.​
~554,000 including individuals with jew ancestry but not recognized as jew by religious law, non-jew family members of jew immigrants, Christians other than Arabs & Armenians, and residents without distinct ethnic or religious categorization.

So basically Israel is roughly 75ish% jew, and the Israeli jew composition is approximately:
•45% Ashkenazi, primarily Caucasoid​
•55% Mizrahi, includes variably miscegenated Caucasoid blood.​

Which suggests Israel is predominantly occupied by individuals possessed of caucasoid blood.
This certainly isn't to suggest jews occupying Israel have any claim to the land merely due to hijacking Caucasoid blood into their pernicious cult.

jews aren't a race, a religion, a people, a nation and Israel is merely another artificial construct. jews are quite literally an international parasitic cult.

The simple reality is, the only supposed claim jews have to anything is that which they've stolen, corrupted and through the sheer scale of physical and metaphysical violence and subversion they impose in order to retain their ill gotten hoards.
 
Sure, I understand what you're saying.

There are five issues imo;
1
. Race, as a serious scientific concept, has been thoroughly subverted, smeared, discarded from the official correct think agenda, substituted with various overlapping fictive/semi-fictive concepts like genetics, ethnicity, identity, culture, religion, blackness, whiteness and such.


2. Race, as definitive term for referencing a scientific concept, is now generally just used as a rhetorical weapon by jews, zogbots, the indoctrinated masses & other ziotards.


3. I can't recall ever encountering anyone arguing for Israel, directly using race to support their case, rather instead only casting it as an offensive weapon while preferring interchangeable correct think terms & concepts in allusion to racial distinctions both defensively & offensively, like ethnicity, culture, identity, faith, belief, religion, heritage, genetics, nationality and so on.




4. White, isn't a race either. Neither is black. These terms in this context are simply correct think approved fictive constructs that, again, merely serve as interchangeably weaponizable substitutions for wittingly or unwittingly alluding to racial distinctions without directly referring to the now discarded heretical concept of race. Eg: generalized allusions to primary caucasoids as "white", while obviously plenty of cross breeds physically appear "white" too, yet aren't primary caucasoids.


5. Unfortunately the Ashkenazi Rothschild's state of Israel was/is overwhelmingly populated by individuals of predominantly Caucasoid make-up.

Worldwide, the 3 main jew sub-groups are:
Ashkenazi (Central & Eastern European)​
Shepardi (Iberian Peninsula)​
Mizrahi (Western/Central Asia & North Africa)​

Though generally Shepardi & Mizrahi are considered one group with either title used interchangeably.
Ashkenazi are predominantly Caucasoid.​
Shepardi are a mix of various hybrid Caucasoids, Mongoloids & Negroids.​
Mizrahi are also a mix of various hybrid Caucasoids, Mongoloids & Negroids.​

So basically 2 main jew sub-groups, with the common denominator being Caucasoid blood.


Going by the 2 main jew sub-group concept, according to the Googles, the composition of all jews worldwide is roughly:
•70% Ashkenazi.​
•30% Mizrahi/Shepardi.​

And Israel's demographic composition is, according to Wiki:
•73.2% classified as jew.​
~7,208,000 + 503,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank.
•21.1% classified as Arab.​
~2,080,000 Palestinians, Druze, Circassians, Muslims, Christians, Armenians & Arabs.
•5.7% classified as other.​
~554,000 including individuals with jew ancestry but not recognized as jew by religious law, non-jew family members of jew immigrants, Christians other than Arabs & Armenians, and residents without distinct ethnic or religious categorization.

So basically Israel is roughly 75ish% jew, and the Israeli jew composition is approximately:
•45% Ashkenazi, primarily Caucasoid​
•55% Mizrahi, includes variably miscegenated Caucasoid blood.​

Which suggests Israel is predominantly occupied by individuals possessed of caucasoid blood.
Ashkenazi Jews are mixed race too. The ancestors of Ashkenazi Jews mixed with Arabs (who in turn were mixed with black Africans) 2000 years ago and the Chinese 1400 years ago when they were trading on the Silk Road. Palestinians have much more Negroid DNA than Jews though because Islam permitted mixing with black concubines.

So-called "Caucasian but not white" groups like North Africans, Arabs, and Iranians are just mixed race mongrels. Pure Caucasoids look like the Irish.
 
Ashkenazi Jews are mixed race too. The ancestors of Ashkenazi Jews mixed with Arabs (who in turn were mixed with black Africans) 2000 years ago and the Chinese 1400 years ago when they were trading on the Silk Road.
Well yeah, that's what mean by the Ashkenazi being predominantly Caucasoid hybrids—rather than saying they're pure Caucasoid.

I'm not sure of what your interpretation of Arab is though.
The modern usage of the term 'Arab' is extremely ambiguous and can refer to anything from ethnicity, language, culture, etc....but not racial distinction.
For example: Israel classifies all non-jews in the Levant (*Eastern Mediterranean, Israel/Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan, West Syria) as Arab, yet Arabs are from the Arabid hybrid group originating in the Arabian Peninsula while Levantines are from the Levantine hybrid group originating in the Levant

So Israel's ambiguous usage of the term 'Arab' altogether disregards ethnic, linguistic, cultural as well as racial distinctions yet simultaneously selectively regards all of these distinctions but only insofar as Israel concerns the distinction between jew vs non-jew. Israel's fictive usage of the term 'Arab' is arbitrarily defined and means whatever Israel alone dictates irrespective of the largely fictive contemporary Common English definitions for the term 'Arab'.

Here's a rough idea of my interpretation regarding the general racial make-up of the region.
IMG_20250702_144014.jpg
In a very basic generalized sense:
1. Primary Caucasoids (Europeans)
2. Primary Mongoloids (Asians)
3. Primary Negroids (Africans)
4. Caucasoid×Mongoloid hybrids (Eurasians)
5. Caucasoid×Negroid hybrids (Mediterranids)
6. Caucasoid×Mongoloid×Negroid hybrids (Indids)
7. Mongoloid×Negroid hybrids (Arabids)
8. Caucasoid×Mongoloid hybrids (Iranids)
9. Caucasoid×Negroid×Mongoloid hybrids (Anatolians)
10. Caucasoid×Negroid×Mongoloid hybrids (Levatines)

Palestinians have much more Negroid DNA than Jews though because Islam permitted mixing with black concubines.
I'm unsure what your definition of Palestinian is.

Do you mean the various hybrid racial groups (excluding the Israel jews) who formerly &/or currently reside within the occupied territory of Palestine/Israel?
If so, this would be incorrect because the term Palestinian encompasses various hybrid racial groups as well as hybrid sub-racial hybrid groups, including Levantines, Persians, Arabids, Mediterranids, Eurasians, Anatolians et al. These also comprise various ethnicities, languages, cultures and etcetera too. For example: the Palestinian group comprises Levantine, Arabid, Anatolian & Persian jews, islamics, christians, secularists, atheists and so on. The Palestinian group also comprises multiple different languages including Arabic, Farsi, Hebrew, etc.

So just as it is with the ambiguous contemporary term 'Arab', the term 'Palestinian' is also commonly misused to falsely define a fictive homogeneous group comprising many distinct groups which are simply not homogeneous but rather merely occupying the artificially designated geographic territory currently known as Israel/Palestine.
Technically, we could reasonably refer to all individuals and groups currently within the Israel/Palestine geographic territory as being both Israelis &/or Palestinians interchangeably, much the same way Israeli jews claim to be American/Israeli-American in the USA and Israeli/Israeli-American in Israel/Palestine.

🤔....fuck, ya know what. I think I might actually start doing that. As in: refer to Israeli jews as Palestinians simply to infuriate the pernicious shitfuck jew cultists....😂

So-called "Caucasian but not white" groups like North Africans, Arabs, and Iranians are just mixed race mongrels. Pure Caucasoids look like the Irish.
Yeah but there are no pure Caucasoids now, just as there are no pure Mongoloids, Australoids or Negroids either. This is why I use the term 'predominantly' when referring to the primary racial groups, because nowadays these are just the core descending remnants of 4 of the dozens of original progenitor races.
Everyone today is a hybrid to some degree.
 
Well yeah, that's what mean by the Ashkenazi being predominantly Caucasoid hybrids—rather than saying they're pure Caucasoid.

I'm not sure of what your interpretation of Arab is though.
The modern usage of the term 'Arab' is extremely ambiguous and can refer to anything from ethnicity, language, culture, etc....but not racial distinction.
For example: Israel classifies all non-jews in the Levant (*Eastern Mediterranean, Israel/Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan, West Syria) as Arab, yet Arabs are from the Arabid hybrid group originating in the Arabian Peninsula while Levantines are from the Levantine hybrid group originating in the Levant

So Israel's ambiguous usage of the term 'Arab' altogether disregards ethnic, linguistic, cultural as well as racial distinctions yet simultaneously selectively regards all of these distinctions but only insofar as Israel concerns the distinction between jew vs non-jew. Israel's fictive usage of the term 'Arab' is arbitrarily defined and means whatever Israel alone dictates irrespective of the largely fictive contemporary Common English definitions for the term 'Arab'.

Here's a rough idea of my interpretation regarding the general racial make-up of the region.
View attachment 235951
In a very basic generalized sense:
1. Primary Caucasoids (Europeans)
2. Primary Mongoloids (Asians)
3. Primary Negroids (Africans)
4. Caucasoid×Mongoloid hybrids (Eurasians)
5. Caucasoid×Negroid hybrids (Mediterranids)
6. Caucasoid×Mongoloid×Negroid hybrids (Indids)
7. Mongoloid×Negroid hybrids (Arabids)
8. Caucasoid×Mongoloid hybrids (Iranids)
9. Caucasoid×Negroid×Mongoloid hybrids (Anatolians)
10. Caucasoid×Negroid×Mongoloid hybrids (Levatines)


I'm unsure what your definition of Palestinian is.

Do you mean the various hybrid racial groups (excluding the Israel jews) who formerly &/or currently reside within the occupied territory of Palestine/Israel?
If so, this would be incorrect because the term Palestinian encompasses various hybrid racial groups as well as hybrid sub-racial hybrid groups, including Levantines, Persians, Arabids, Mediterranids, Eurasians, Anatolians et al. These also comprise various ethnicities, languages, cultures and etcetera too. For example: the Palestinian group comprises Levantine, Arabid, Anatolian & Persian jews, islamics, christians, secularists, atheists and so on. The Palestinian group also comprises multiple different languages including Arabic, Farsi, Hebrew, etc.

So just as it is with the ambiguous contemporary term 'Arab', the term 'Palestinian' is also commonly misused to falsely define a fictive homogeneous group comprising many distinct groups which are simply not homogeneous but rather merely occupying the artificially designated geographic territory currently known as Israel/Palestine.
Technically, we could reasonably refer to all individuals and groups currently within the Israel/Palestine geographic territory as being both Israelis &/or Palestinians interchangeably, much the same way Israeli jews claim to be American/Israeli-American in the USA and Israeli/Israeli-American in Israel/Palestine.

🤔....fuck, ya know what. I think I might actually start doing that. As in: refer to Israeli jews as Palestinians simply to infuriate the pernicious shitfuck jew cultists....😂


Yeah but there are no pure Caucasoids now, just as there are no pure Mongoloids, Australoids or Negroids either. This is why I use the term 'predominantly' when referring to the primary racial groups, because nowadays these are just the core descending remnants of 4 of the dozens of original progenitor races.
Everyone today is a hybrid to some degree.
Palestinian can't exactly be defined. Before 1948, Palestine was made up of wandering Jordanians, Lebanese, and Jews. Thus, it's entirely not wrong to call the non-Ashkenazi Israelis Palestinian Jews. Nearly all Palestinians would have had ancestors who were Jews long ago who were forcibly converted to Islam. Therefore, it's entirely a religious dispute. That's why Christians using the Bible to justify supporting the Israelis are stupid. They're supporting one group for supporting a religion that's not their own. If they think it's so important to support Jews, why don't they just convert to Judaism and stop corrupting Christianity into a pro-Jewish cult?

The map is pretty accurate except for these points:

-Indids are a mixture of Caucasoids, Australoids, and Mongoloids. Northern Indians have more Caucasoid admixture. Southern Indians are more Australoid. The more East you go, the more Mongoloid in appearance they are.
-Arabs and Levantines don't have any significant Mongoloid blood. That whole region was heavily Caucasoid until Islam caused the spread of Negroid slave genes throughout the Middle East. Now they're an octoroon population.
 
Last edited:
I see no reason to support any particular religious group.

Faith in Christ is the only way to salvation, bloodline pathway was made obsolete by Christ. It does not exist. This topic is so obvious to those who will take a step back from group think.

Anyone can be "The Chosen". They simply have to choose to be. End of story.
 
Palestinian can't exactly be defined. Before 1948, Palestine was made up of wandering Jordanians, Lebanese, and Jews. Thus, it's entirely not wrong to call the non-Ashkenazi Israelis Palestinian Jews. Nearly all Palestinians would have had ancestors who were Jews long ago who were forcibly converted to Islam. Therefore, it's entirely a religious dispute. That's why Christians using the Bible to justify supporting the Israelis are stupid. They're supporting one group for supporting a religion that's not their own. If they think it's so important to support Jews, why don't they just convert to Judaism and stop corrupting Christianity into a pro-Jewish cult?

The map is pretty accurate except for these points:

-Indids are a mixture of Caucasoids, Australoids, and Mongoloids. Northern Indians have more Caucasoid admixture. Southern Indians are more Australoid. The more East you go, the more Mongoloid in appearance they are.
-Arabs and Levantines don't have any significant Mongoloid blood. That whole region was heavily Caucasoid until the Islam caused the spread of Negroid slave genes throughout the Middle East. Now they're an octoroon population.
Too right aye, the core issue is the rampant abramic religious cult's endless nonsense.

Like whenever horrific unnatural shits goin' down, there's almost always some cristards, islamitards or jewtards slithering around.
 
great threat however imo
🤔
Humans don't have races, we are all a separate species altogether.
As we have learned from the monkey theory, humans had several differentially distinct species.
Religiously we are told we live amongst different species.
Once we figure that out, I believe humans might be able to understand sum things abt this realm that we live.
Until then we don't know history, presently understand the present or have any consitant hopes of the future.
as for the middle east:
them nggas haven't ever understood who they were or are.
them nggas still live archaicly feral af.
They're all brothers and cousins, reverberating the same ideological falsies of superiority & yet them nggas don't even have a single armament safety course.
The same nggas who think child marriages, incest and rape are cool things u do with your friends.
The same nggas who tell the world not to judge them while demanded everyone else bows to them in every aspect of life;
Bc they gave the rest of the world the idea of racing towards being the ultimate separate superior species.
The same nggas who openly condemn slavery whilst having current slave trades within their nation's.
The same nggas who bomb kids & then say don't bomb our kids.
Them nggas are the ancients rendition of what they thought humans should be, enslaved bc if the ancient kikes and sand nggas said so, it must be so, right?
It's entirely why I do not trust maps.
(no not minor attracted persons those demons deserve death)
I do not trust maps bc 99% of maps are comprised of a jews assessment of land masses.
now tbh
I don't think any species should have to live completely separated but I also don't think we should be just intermixing just for the fun of it.
But I also believe we should know who a person is via their previous actions with others before cozying up to them.
Now what abt those whom u don't know, Skinnie?
Then u just watch them, nggas on some juke shit will out themselves in time & it doesn't matter who they are.
Now back to the soy of the matter:
kikes & sand nggas are still fighting over sum petty shit from thousands of years ago but if u search up history far enuff back, u find that once upon a time before the race to self destruction began, all the human species lived together without any anomosities, jelousies or prejudices.
Then again I've always demanded to know who we are as humans if as it historically seems humans are only meant to be enslaved.
I mean why else wld they tell us there's definitely more out there and yet this shit hole shit show of reality is all we've known for centuries.
So in conclusion:
If any 1 species was as superior as they claim, we would not be "racing" towards our demise but actually and officially exploring the outer realms and quite possibly space it self
Beyond that this is all just a muck raking of the what if's and maybes that we can't control until we unite in such a way that the past doesn't matter as much as the future depends on human understanding the present & that's the contextual optics of the past.
What is optically relevant abt the past is the constant reminder of the perpetual repeating patern of enslavement and successfully obtaining this thing called freedom just to eventually end up being enslaved once again.
And that's where the subversion tactic of cognative separation begins again bc the compromised humans who think their actually humans just can't grasp what the enslavement is in today's sense.
So if any 1 could explain this shit to me like I'm a foreign national from another planet/dimension & w/out being a total NPC slave abt it, I'm all ears. 🤨😤🚬
Screenshot_2023-11-27-19-24-01-17_3aea4af51f236e4932235fdada7d1643.jpg
 
Last edited:

Donate 2025

Total amount
$150.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom