Nope. I don't dislike her. I don't think she was great for SC. She did ok. Similar to our gov now McMaster. I wouldn't vote for him for president either. But he has been a good governor.
But why should he be compelled to agree to voting for someone who he disagrees with. It isn't like he'd vote for a dem. That is all dog and pony show political bullshit. It is all political theater to try and get someone in a gotcha moment. No different that Schiff saying he had all the evidence or Trump was committing a quid pro quo over the call w Ukraine to find corruption. Why hasn't Biden been impeached for getting the prosecutor fired? Haven't heard a word from him in the states. He wants to talk. The Cabal doesn't want him to so no one in the mainstream media will even consider it. Everything is below the surface and has been since the Great Depression. Hell even before that w the dupont family and JPMorgan and the other Barons
No one can inflict gun control with out a constitutional convention. Look up Supreme Court strikes down gun control.
Don’t forget he supports abortion even further along now, along with supporting the lgbtq movement. He also has an absolutely horrid batting average with putting people in charge who are for the people.
I can't tell who you're shilling for write now. When you're rich you know a fucking ton of othernrich people.
I have no idea how any of this relates to my post. Started early today?
I deflect and confuse
what some skittles?
take the skittles out of your mouth
fair
The founding fathers intended for the "state" (the people) to keep arms specifically used for military service, when called upon in defense of the country, or as they called it, "the militia". In other words, we are supposed to have the same hardware as the military. This is clear and has be proven in several supreme court decisions, most notably US vs Miller, 1939 and two days ago a California Judge delaced the High Cap mag ban unconstitutional. Next friday, they will likely repeal the "assualt weapons" ban.
Incorrect. The second amendment only provides that you have access to “arms” if you are in a militia. The Supreme Court expanded that right via interpretation to include ordinary citizens outside of a militia having the right to firearms in Heller.
Dude you called ot correctly. Him and some dude @TheResister or some such other cockknocker are shills. No way the fucking idiots are dumber than aoc
www.lawyers.com
The Second Amendment was not enacted to provide a check on government tyranny; rather, it was written to assure the Southern states that Congress would not undermine the slave system by using its newly acquired constitutional authority over the militia to disarm the state militia and thereby destroy the South's principal instrument of slave control. In effect, the Second Amendment supplemented the slavery compromise made at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and obliquely codified in other constitutional provisions."
Bogus: Slavery and the 2nd Amendment | RWU Law
From WABE, Atlanta's NPR affiliate: "The 'Right to Bear Arms'... Against Slave Revolts?" by Steve Gosslaw.rwu.edu
For decades, many scholars and courts interpreted the amendment as only preserving states’ authority to keep militias, which would mean that the right to have firearms was linked to militia service.
But in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Supreme Court reached a broader interpretation, finding that the Second Amendment gave individuals a right to have guns—unconnected to any militia service—and to use them for traditionally legal purposes like self-defense.
Second Amendment Rights: What Are the Limits on the Right to Own Guns?
Most U.S. citizens have a Second Amendment right to own and carry firearms, but courts have upheld some gun control. Learn what 2nd amendment limitations exist.
if you are an able bodied male, and a citizen of the USA, YOU ARE THE MILITIA.
False.
great, thanks
Try not to get it wrong anymore in the future please. We don’t want the mouth breathers acting like fools because someone told them inaccurate civics information.
The only people that would refer to me as a cockknocker or a shill are dumb asses whose IQ is smaller than their shoe size.
I’ve posted links from reliable sources disproving this post and your other one.
I'm not here to troll and you haven't disproven shit. Since it takes a lot of effort to give civics lessons on a discussion board, I will leave a link for those who are genuinely interested. and the real deal is simple: I've argued many of the things I post about and won them in courtrooms. You're not likely going to prove what I say wrong save of a questionable source here and there. And, when you check into my links, see the internal links. You will find that I quote from the most authoritative sources:
thanks
says you? HAHAHA What a fag
Roarrrrrr
