-
In Memory of Rebarcock.
As we navigate life without Pat 'Rebarcock.' Flood, who passed on Sept 21, 2025, we continue to remember the profound impact he had on our community. His support was a cornerstone for our forum. We encourage you to visit the memorial thread to share your memories and condolences. In honor of Pat’s love for storytelling, please contribute to his ‘Rebarcock tells a story’ thread. Your stories will help keep his spirit alive among us.
Haha holy shit 🇺🇸
- Thread starter PawPower1981
- Start date
They were screaming TRUMP!
TheResister
Elite
More people were granted asylum under Trump than Obama. The "problem" must not be that bad; Trump thinks it can wait another year. Too bad he won't tell Congress to remove the anti-gun legislation from existing proposals and address this issue.
Liquid Reigns
Poster
Where do you come up with your stupid claims? More granted asylum under Trump than Obama? How about a link to that claim. SMFH
The proposed Senate Bill sucks, why would the House agree to it? Are you rooting for the Democrats to achieve their goals? udumfuk
Why doesn't Biden use the laws already on the books in the INA? Biden has authority to shut the borders down, what's he waiting on? Me thinks you are a Democrat masquerading as a wannabe Republican strategist. URDUMFUK
Joe King
Elite
Either because he mistakenly believes it to be politically beneficial to his party's goals, or because he's a dotering old fool with dementia who doesn't know what day it is.
Or quite possibly both.
Joe King
Elite
All any law needs to say, is that anyone caught crossing between Ports of Entry are immediately arrested and given a 1 year prison sentence. Then deported to Ecuador in the middle of the night.
That'd be part one.
Part two would say that anyone claiming asylum must do so from either Mexico or Canada AND show multiple forms of proof supporting their asylum claim.
If they don't pass, they too get deported to Ecuador in the middle of the night.
Part three, the government is prohibited from allowing any entry once the gov does not have adequate manpower to keep track of those already here.
Same applies to the number of Judges hearing cases. Once the backlog reaches one Month, all new claims are halted.
If it still is a problem, line the border with the military.
That's all any new border security law needs to say.
That'd be part one.
Part two would say that anyone claiming asylum must do so from either Mexico or Canada AND show multiple forms of proof supporting their asylum claim.
If they don't pass, they too get deported to Ecuador in the middle of the night.
Part three, the government is prohibited from allowing any entry once the gov does not have adequate manpower to keep track of those already here.
Same applies to the number of Judges hearing cases. Once the backlog reaches one Month, all new claims are halted.
If it still is a problem, line the border with the military.
That's all any new border security law needs to say.
Similar threads
