Master Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Community megathread
NARCISSISTIC LITTLE BITCH-BOY...
Thomas Massie, you smug, motherfucker...
You and your bipartisan virtue-signal buddy Ro Khanna decided to play heroic crusaders, strong-arming the DOJ into unredacting names from the Epstein files because “transparency.”
Six names dropped into the public arena like raw meat to the wolves: Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonid Leonov, Nicola Caputo, Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, and Leslie Wexner.
Four of those men...Nuara, Mikeladze, Leonov, and Caputo...turned out to be completely fucking innocent. They were in a goddamn photo lineup. Nothing more. No flights, no island, no crimes, no connection to Epstein’s depraved network whatsoever. Just regular men whose names you two grandstanding pricks blasted across the world without context, without caution, without a shred of responsibility.
You knew exactly what would happen. You knew the second those names hit the feed, the online mob would descend. Careers torched. Families harassed. Reputations permanently stained with the most radioactive accusation imaginable: association with a child-sex trafficking ring.
In criminology we call this “guilt by association on steroids”...a modern-day public execution where the mere whisper of “Epstein” functions as a life sentence of suspicion. Psychologically, it’s devastating: social death, chronic anxiety, suicidal ideation in extreme cases.
These aren’t abstract concepts, you arrogant fuck...these are human lives you obliterated for clout.
And when a constituent dares ask you, politely, if you’re going to apologize for this reckless, life-destroying stunt?
You deflect with a fucking spelling joke. “Are you going to apologise?”“you should apologize for that spelling.”
That’s not wit, you pathetic son of a bitch. That’s the response of a sociopathic child who just burned down a house and laughs when confronted with the ashes. It’s peak narcissistic deflection: minimize, mock, refuse accountability. You hide behind pedantic bullshit because you cannot...will not...face the magnitude of the harm you’ve caused.
Four innocent men waking up to death threats, job loss, friends ghosting them, strangers accusing them of monstrous crimes… and you’re quibbling over “-ise” vs “-ize.”
Legally? You’re on thin ice, congressman. Congressional immunity might shield you from direct defamation suits, but recklessly publishing uncontextualized names from sealed files knowing the foreseeable harm it would cause? That’s not “transparency”...that’s negligent, possibly malicious publication of private facts. Courts have carved out exceptions when public officials abuse their platform to destroy private citizens.
These men never sought the spotlight. You dragged them into it and lit them on fire.
You’re not a truth-teller. You’re not a hero. You’re a reckless, ego-drunk opportunist who weaponized the Epstein tragedy for retweets and then joked when the collateral damage became undeniable.
Four innocent men will carry your stain for the rest of their lives.
And you, Thomas Massie, will carry the knowledge that you did it for nothing more than a cheap punchline. Rot in the contempt you’ve earned, you reprehensible motherfucker.
SHOCKING Another fucking Jew fucking people over - shocked I tell you!
per Grok
The SWAT operation in Tucson is confirmed by multiple sources (e.g., KVOA, First Coast News) as connected to Nancy Guthrie's disappearance. It occurred in Catalina Foothills near Placita De Graciela, about 2 miles from her home. Reports of three detained and one self-inflicted gunshot death come from witness accounts in outlets like The Express, but official confirmations are limited as the investigation is ongoing.
I don’t know, you didn’t post a link faggit.
I tried but cant find it. Thats why I am asking. If anyone has seen 'it' lemme know.
Here’s the actual source of the claim, and what it really says:
The key claim comes from newly reviewed Epstein files (2026)
According to Rep. Jamie Raskin, who was allowed to review unredacted Justice Department files, one document contains a 2009 email summary stating that Epstein:- Was a guest at Mar-a-Lago
- Had “never been asked to leave” (nationaltoday.com)
Raskin explicitly said the document “appears to contradict” Trump’s longstanding assertion that he banned Epstein. (People.com)
What Trump himself has said publicly
Trump has repeatedly claimed he banned Epstein, saying things like:- He ended the relationship because Epstein “stole people that worked for me”
- He told Epstein: “Out of here.” (cnbc.com)
Important clarification: no manager denial is confirmed
There is no verified reporting showing a Mar-a-Lago manager personally denying the ban claim.The contradiction comes from:
- Legal correspondence cited in Epstein-related documents
- Statements by lawmakers reviewing DOJ files
- Lack of definitive contemporaneous documentation proving a formal ban (factually.co)
Bottom line
- Trump has publicly claimed he banned Epstein.
- Newly reviewed Epstein-related legal documents reportedly say Epstein was “never asked to leave.”
- This contradiction comes from legal files and lawmakers reviewing them—not from a Mar-a-Lago manager directly denying it.
Why did Epstein order soo fucking much Sulfuric Acid? Joe Rogan tried to gaslight its for desalting.. But I beg the difference.. Not that quantity, and why at that time...?
In 2018, federal authorities in the Southern District of New York were building the case that ultimately led to Epstein’s arrest in July 2019. Orders placed during this period naturally attract scrutiny because investigators often examine whether subjects changed behaviors, acquired unusual materials, or altered infrastructure.
The timing is considered “interesting” because the sulfuric acid order reportedly occurred around the same period federal investigators were re-examining or escalating their case against Jeffrey Epstein,
the acid order was listed alongside reverse-osmosis system components such as probes and sensors, which is consistent with legitimate desalination maintenance. This creates ambiguity.
Sulfuric acid is used in desalination plants to prevent scaling and protect membranes, but it does not remove salt itself—the actual desalination is performed by physical separation methods like reverse osmosis.
330 US gallons = 1,249 liters (exactly 1,249.2 L).
Now, how much seawater that could treat depends on the dosing rate.
Industrial sulfuric acid is typically ~98% and has a density of about 1.84 kg per liter, so:
1,249 L × 1.84 kg/L = 2,298 kg of sulfuric acid
= 2,298,000 grams
= 2,298,000,000 mg
= 4.6 billion liters
= 460 million liters
Yes — for “a tiny island with only a couple of households,” 330 gallons every two years would be wildly disproportionate if it’s only for desalination pretreatment.
Let’s quantify it.
You have:
330 US gallons ≈ 1,249 liters of concentrated (~98%) sulfuric acid
≈ 2,298 kg of acid
Even using the high dosing rate (5 mg/L):
2,298,000,000 mg ÷ 5 mg/L ≈ 460 million liters of seawater treated
Now compare that to realistic household demand.
Assume:
• 4 households
• 3 people per household
• 150–200 liters per person per day
That’s roughly:
12 people × 200 L/day = 2,400 L/day
Per year:
2,400 × 365 ≈ 876,000 liters
Over two years:
≈ 1.75 million liters
Now compare:
Acid supply capacity at conservative dosing:
460 million liters
Island need over 2 years:
~1.75 million liters
That’s a difference of about 260× more acid than necessary.
If dosing were 1 mg/L (common), the mismatch becomes over 1,000× too much.
So yes — strictly from an engineering standpoint, that volume makes no sense for a micro-scale desalination system serving only a few homes.
For a setup that small, acid usage would likely be:
• Measured in tens of liters per year
• Possibly replaced by cartridge antiscalants instead
• Or even not required at all depending on source water chemistry
The only ways 330 gallons might make sense:
• It’s servicing a much larger facility (hotel, military site, industrial use)
• It’s shared storage for multiple years beyond two
• It’s being used for other industrial or cleaning purposes
• It’s not actually for desalination
But for “a couple of households every two years”?
Technically speaking — that volume is grossly oversized.
Yes — for a very small desalination plant serving only a few households, smaller containers are the normal and rational choice, not large drums or bulk storage.
Here’s how scale typically determines container size:
Common container sizes:
Common containers:
Common storage:
Safety risk
Sulfuric acid is highly corrosive and dangerous
Regulatory burden
Many jurisdictions require permits above certain volumes
Material degradation risk
More exposure time increases contamination or dilution risk
Cost inefficiency
Capital tied up in unused chemicals
Handling difficulty
Large drums require special equipment
20 to 100 liters on site maximum
Possibly less if supply access is easy.
Anything near 1,249 liters is industrial-scale storage, not residential-scale support.
In 2018, federal authorities in the Southern District of New York were building the case that ultimately led to Epstein’s arrest in July 2019. Orders placed during this period naturally attract scrutiny because investigators often examine whether subjects changed behaviors, acquired unusual materials, or altered infrastructure.
The timing is considered “interesting” because the sulfuric acid order reportedly occurred around the same period federal investigators were re-examining or escalating their case against Jeffrey Epstein,
the acid order was listed alongside reverse-osmosis system components such as probes and sensors, which is consistent with legitimate desalination maintenance. This creates ambiguity.
Sulfuric acid is used in desalination plants to prevent scaling and protect membranes, but it does not remove salt itself—the actual desalination is performed by physical separation methods like reverse osmosis.
330 US gallons = 1,249 liters (exactly 1,249.2 L).
Now, how much seawater that could treat depends on the dosing rate.
Industrial sulfuric acid is typically ~98% and has a density of about 1.84 kg per liter, so:
1,249 L × 1.84 kg/L = 2,298 kg of sulfuric acid
= 2,298,000 grams
= 2,298,000,000 mg
Water treatment capacity based on typical desalination dosing
Typical dosing: 0.5 to 5 mg per liter of seawaterAt 0.5 mg/L (very efficient dosing):
2,298,000,000 mg ÷ 0.5 mg/L = 4,596,000,000 liters of water= 4.6 billion liters
At 5 mg/L (conservative dosing):
2,298,000,000 mg ÷ 5 mg/L = 459,600,000 liters= 460 million liters
Practical real-world equivalent
460 million to 4.6 billion liters equals:- 460,000 to 4,600,000 cubic meters
- Enough drinking water for roughly 6,000 to 60,000 people for an entire year
Bottom line
330 gallons of sulfuric acid could support desalination of roughly 460 million to 4.6 billion liters of seawater, depending on dosing efficiency.Yes — for “a tiny island with only a couple of households,” 330 gallons every two years would be wildly disproportionate if it’s only for desalination pretreatment.
Let’s quantify it.
You have:
330 US gallons ≈ 1,249 liters of concentrated (~98%) sulfuric acid
≈ 2,298 kg of acid
Even using the high dosing rate (5 mg/L):
2,298,000,000 mg ÷ 5 mg/L ≈ 460 million liters of seawater treated
Now compare that to realistic household demand.
Assume:
• 4 households
• 3 people per household
• 150–200 liters per person per day
That’s roughly:
12 people × 200 L/day = 2,400 L/day
Per year:
2,400 × 365 ≈ 876,000 liters
Over two years:
≈ 1.75 million liters
Now compare:
Acid supply capacity at conservative dosing:
460 million liters
Island need over 2 years:
~1.75 million liters
That’s a difference of about 260× more acid than necessary.
If dosing were 1 mg/L (common), the mismatch becomes over 1,000× too much.
So yes — strictly from an engineering standpoint, that volume makes no sense for a micro-scale desalination system serving only a few homes.
For a setup that small, acid usage would likely be:
• Measured in tens of liters per year
• Possibly replaced by cartridge antiscalants instead
• Or even not required at all depending on source water chemistry
The only ways 330 gallons might make sense:
• It’s servicing a much larger facility (hotel, military site, industrial use)
• It’s shared storage for multiple years beyond two
• It’s being used for other industrial or cleaning purposes
• It’s not actually for desalination
But for “a couple of households every two years”?
Technically speaking — that volume is grossly oversized.
Yes — for a very small desalination plant serving only a few households, smaller containers are the normal and rational choice, not large drums or bulk storage.
Here’s how scale typically determines container size:
Micro-scale systems (homes, small islands, boats)
Typical acid use: 5 to 50 liters per yearCommon container sizes:
- 5-liter containers
- 10-liter containers
- 20-liter containers (most common)
- Occasionally 25-liter jerrycans
- Handle safely
- Store securely
- Replace before contamination
- Avoid excess hazardous inventory
Small commercial systems (small hotels, communities)
Typical use: 50 to 500 liters per yearCommon containers:
- 20-liter containers
- 200-liter drums (only when justified)
Large municipal or industrial plants
Typical use: thousands to millions of liters per yearCommon storage:
- 200-liter drums
- 1,000-liter IBC tanks
- Bulk tanker deliveries
- Permanent storage tanks
Why oversizing is avoided
Large excess storage creates real disadvantages:Safety risk
Sulfuric acid is highly corrosive and dangerous
Regulatory burden
Many jurisdictions require permits above certain volumes
Material degradation risk
More exposure time increases contamination or dilution risk
Cost inefficiency
Capital tied up in unused chemicals
Handling difficulty
Large drums require special equipment
Engineering reality for “a couple households”
A rational setup would typically keep:20 to 100 liters on site maximum
Possibly less if supply access is easy.
Anything near 1,249 liters is industrial-scale storage, not residential-scale support.
Bottom line
For a micro desalination system serving a few homes, buying sulfuric acid in small containers (5–25 liters) is standard practice, and storing drum-level volumes would be operationally unnecessary and atypical.
Last edited:
let’s put 4.6 billion liters into terms Americans immediately relate to.
1. Gallons
- 1 US gallon ≈ 3.785 liters
- 4,600,000,000 L ÷ 3.785 ≈ 1.22 billion gallons
Compare:
- Average American household uses ~300 gallons per day
- 1.22 billion gallons ÷ 300 gallons/day ≈ 4.07 million household-days of water
- For 4 households on a tiny island: 4.07 million ÷ 4 ≈ 1 million days of water → ~2,740 years
2. Swimming pools
- Standard residential pool: ~20,000 gallons
- 1.22 billion ÷ 20,000 ≈ 61,000 swimming pools
- Olympic pool: 660,000 gallons
- 1.22 billion ÷ 660,000 ≈ 1,850 Olympic-sized pools
3. Football fields
- US football field (including end zones) ≈ 57,600 sq ft (~5,350 m²)
- Depth to hold 1.22 billion gallons (~4.6 million m³): 4,600,000 m³ ÷ 5,350 m² ≈ 860 meters deep
- That’s about 2,800 feet — taller than most mountains
4. Summary for perspective
4.6 billion liters (1.22 billion gallons) could supply:
- 4 households for ~2,740 years
- 61,000 backyard pools
- 1,850 Olympic pools
- Fill a football field ~860 meters deep
Bottom line: for a tiny island or just a few households, this is absurdly overkill.
Similar threads
