“The Global Power Struggle No One Is Explaining — And Why America First Disrupted Everything”
The world has been moving toward a major disruption, whether most people realized it or not. This was not a slow philosophical shift. It was a collision course between competing global power structures, each offering a very different future. What we are witnessing right now is the fallout of that collision.
For years, the global trajectory narrowed into two dominant paths.
The first path was a China-led order built around the BRICS alliance, the one belt one road initiative, and drawing together China, Russia, Iran, as militarily aligned regimes. Due to China this model rejects individual liberty, suppresses dissent, controls economies through centralized power, and expands influence through debt, intimidation, and force. It is authoritarian at its core and openly hostile to Western constitutional principles and freedoms.
This path also would have meant major de-dollarization and the loss of the U.S. dollar as the world’s global reserve currency. Such a shift would not have been gradual. It likely would have resulted in at least a 40 percent intrinsic value loss of the U.S. dollars position almost overnight, wiping out our purchasing power, destabilizing markets, and very likely plunging the United States into a deep economic depression for decades.
The second path was the European globalist model, championed by institutions like the World Economic Forum and figures such as Klaus Schwab and Christine Laggard. This vision pushes managed decline for the United States through climate mandates, carbon taxes, digital surveillance, reduced national sovereignty, and the transfer of power from elected governments to unelected global bodies and bureaucratic institutions. Under this system, national borders weaken, manufacturing disappears, energy independence is crushed, and economic freedom erodes quietly but relentlessly. 15 minute cities. You own nothing.
Both paths had something in common. They required the diminishment of American power and taking away of rights and freedoms. They also both lead inevitably to increased religious persecution and the erosion of religious freedom, because centralized global systems cannot tolerate independent faith, biblical conviction, or allegiance to God over the state. They also hate our constitution.
Then a third option emerged.
Donald Trump disrupted the entire global script by offering an Option Three. America First. Constitutional sovereignty. Strong borders. Strong defense. Energy independence. Manufacturing brought home. Jobs restored. Law and order upheld. A secure hemisphere. An unapologetic belief that the United States does not need permission from global elites to exist as a sovereign nation.
That disruption is what many people still fail to grasp.
Option Three threatened both the BRICS axis and the globalist elite simultaneously. It challenged the Chinese expansion model and rejected the World Economic Forum’s managed decline agenda. It restored leverage, not just economically, but spiritually and culturally, by reasserting national identity and accountability. America will not go quietly. We will assert our sovereignty and values to preserve this great nation.
This is why resistance to this option has been so fierce and so coordinated.
Even within parts of the so-called conservative movement, there are figures who oppose this path. The reason is not ideological confusion. It is funding. Many political and propaganda campaigns have been propped up by foreign interests, multinational NGOs, dark money networks, and in some cases narco-terror-linked financing that thrives in lawless border environments. These systems benefit from chaos, open borders, weakened enforcement, and compromised sovereignty. They line corrupt politicians pockets and sway certain “influencers”. In this case we have to ask ourselves which one of these three directions are these people pushing us into?
That is why the number of true constitutional patriots in Congress is shockingly small.
It is also why the attacks feel relentless. Option Three threatens too many revenue streams, too many power structures, and too many long-standing arrangements that were never meant to serve the American people.
What we are seeing now is exposure.
In the coming year, much will unravel. Financial ties will surface. Political allegiances will be revealed. Long-hidden relationships between politicians, NGOs, foreign governments, and criminal networks will come into the light. But discernment will be critical, because confusion is the weapon being used to exhaust the public and obscure the truth.
Make no mistake. The alternatives are not good.
The World Economic Forum model leads to diminished freedom, centralized control, and permanent dependency. The China-BRICS model leads to authoritarian dominance, censorship, and coercion.
Option Three is not perfect, but it is the only path that preserves constitutional governance, national sovereignty, and the ability for a free people to determine their own future.
This is why the disruption feels so intense. It is not chaos for chaos’ sake. It is a global system being challenged at its core.
And once that challenge began, there was no going back.
Let’s keep praying!
