• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Shooter from Portugal.



This guy was supposedly working on a new plasma energy source that would crater energy prices.... I hate to give the jews any leeway when they say "muh Iran" but to kill a republican chick at Brown and then go to MIT and kill a world class Jewish scientist... With them both being from Portugal you would think that was personal. The professor should have been the first hit. I think the Brown attack was to throw people off from the MIT attack. Bigger body count and prominent conservative killed makes killing a legit genius less obvious.

How many scientist from Iran has Israel killed over the years? Hell, they brag about it when they do it.
 
Michael McCune
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧

While everyone argues about 𝐃𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐝 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩, they miss 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲.

He 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞.
He 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐛𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞.
He keeps the 𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐭.

And while they’re busy yelling at 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐧,
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 waits — 𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐮𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐝.

That’s not 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐨𝐬.
That’s 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐲.

😎

While some on the right fret over Trump’s bold comments, and the left feigns outrage (or quietly cheers for fresh attack fodder as their old lines fizzle), the pattern is 𝐜𝐫𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫.

For months, it was all Epstein.
“Release the files!” they demanded, hyping it as the ultimate takedown of Trump.

Trump fired back: “Go ahead—release them. I give my full permission.”

Files and photos have dropped, including recycled social shots everyone already knew about, and as predicted, 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐦.
No smoking gun. No Kraken.

So they pivot desperately to prove orange man bad.

Tariffs?
Critics whined about impacts on farmers, leading to a $12 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 aid package.

Fair point, but Trump’s tariffs have generated 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 $𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 in revenue this year alone.

I’m no mathematician, but even after that $12 billion in targeted aid, that’s still a net gain of $𝟏𝟖𝟖 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 that didn’t exist before.

Democrats: 𝐬𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬 — 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧.
I'm sorry, I hope I didn't hurt your feelings. 

Now, the part that cracks me up.

As a 𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭, I watch for patterns, not just the obvious ones, but the absences that 𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐲.

Every time they hammer Trump, 𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬.
Not sinister, more like a knowing “𝐠𝐨𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐚.”

Trump seems happy to 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐛 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞.
The left loves it.
The right gets jittery.

But both sides are missing the big play:

𝐃𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐝 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐫𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧.

Voters aren’t choosing Trump or anti-Trump.
They’re choosing 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐬.

So to my nervous friends on the right:
Is your state really flipping to 𝐀𝐎𝐂, 𝐇𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐦 𝐉𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬, 𝐈𝐥𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐎𝐦𝐚𝐫, 𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐚 𝐓𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐛 just because Trump wasn’t “presidential” enough about a man who 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞?

And here’s Trump the 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭 — smoke and mirrors.

He takes the heat while the people 𝐡𝐞’𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐲 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝.

While Democrats obsess over dismantling a leader 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐧’𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 and 𝐜𝐚𝐧’𝐭 𝐫𝐮𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧, they ignore what’s coming next.

They’ll be debating 𝐉𝐃 𝐕𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐨 𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐢𝐨 — people who 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐟𝐟.

Backed by a record of 𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐠𝐥𝐨𝐛𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲, and 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭.

And the Democrats’ star debater right now?

𝐀𝐎𝐂.

I’ll sleep well tonight. 😎


1766121459872.png
 
Here's a revealing report on vaccine efficacy

An Inconvenient Study​

Following the release of An Inconvenient Study, several outlets—including Henry Ford, The Conversation, and Stat News—published criticisms of the unpublished vaccinated versus unvaccinated study at the heart of the film.

ICAN responds in order to address valid limitations and invite open scientific debate free from censorship or fear. The following page addresses these criticisms.

Science demands questions and debate, not silence.
 

Powering Our Platform

Total amount
$2.00
Goal
$1,776.00
Back
Top Bottom