-
Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).
Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
Asshole
Poster
Maybe I was wrong about Groks attempt.
Yes it was the Grok server.. But it could also be a dumb filter that simply looks for certain combinations. Such as
- DROP TABLE
- DELETE FROM
- FOREIGN KEY ... ON DELETE CASCADE
- INSERT INTO ... VALUES
Sorry for potentially misleading you. Hope this clears it up.
dirtytoeddawg
Legendary
Goldhedge
Legendary
I get that feeling too. Nothing will get done in DC. It’s got to be done in the Southern District of Miami
CurtOFD78
Legendary
For those of us that don’t have a facebook acct. can you show what else was posted or said?
I posted the entire article last night.
Someone requested a link.
Michael McCune
𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬… 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫.
𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐫.
This is what happens when you build an entire political movement on manufactured villains, emotional panic, and fear-based illusions. The monsters they created — the radicals they empowered — now demand more extremism than the old guard ever intended.
𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐲𝐭𝐡…
Frankenstein always turns around.
The Big Bad Wolf always circles back.
The pigs always discover the straw won’t hold.
And Little Red eventually realizes the wolf was inside the house the whole time.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞.
They lost control of the creature they stitched together.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞.
𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐭.
For more than a decade, Democrat strategists with polished résumés and political-science degrees believed they had mastered the science of mass persuasion.
They believed they could manufacture a villain, repeat the lie long enough, and control the emotional temperature of an entire nation.
So they built one.
They took a man with a real business record — a man whose policies strengthened America — and painted him as a cartoon villain so absurd even Snidely Whiplash would turn away.
They repeated the lie until it hardened into something psychologists now diagnose as Trump Derangement Syndrome.
This wasn’t a mistake, it was the strategy.
They couldn’t sell their policies, so they sold hatred.
They couldn’t inspire loyalty, so they engineered fear.
They built an identity around manufactured victimhood — teaching millions to feel oppressed by a man who never oppressed them.
And for a while, it worked.
But here’s what they never saw coming:
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐭𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬.
The ideology they engineered — the hysteria, the outrage, the emotion-over-reality mindset — grew beyond their control. Like every revolution built on frenzy instead of truth, it eventually turns inward.
Now the monsters they raised —
the AOCs, the Mamdanis, the radical new breed —
are licking their chops.
They don’t look at Chuck Schumer or Hakeem Jeffries as leaders.
They look at them as roadblocks… gatekeepers who didn’t go far enough… the old guard whose manipulations no longer satisfy the beast.
The Democrats who perfected the art of victimhood are now victims of their own creation.
They weaponized outrage to stay in power, and now that outrage is aimed at them.
It’s Frankenstein all over again.
They stitched the monster together, shocked it with fear, fed it hatred, and unleashed it on the country —
only to discover it has no loyalty, no boundaries, and no off-switch.
They thought they could control the anger.
They thought they could ride the whirlwind.
But eventually, the fear they manufactured stopped listening.
𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞.
And that’s where we are now —
watching a political party devoured by the very hysteria it unleashed.
𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.
𝐋𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐬.
Last edited:
Trump needs to unleash hell with the Epstein files. No redactions and no classified information. Arrest everyone and build the gallows.
If it's hail and causes large claims of insurance companies, would the insurance companies have a claim against the cloud seeder and whomever hired them? But for the seeding, there would be no hail claims. Car insurers could have cause too.
Chuck 2020
2022 Fantasy ⚾️ 🏆
Chuck 2020
2022 Fantasy ⚾️ 🏆
Chuck 2020
2022 Fantasy ⚾️ 🏆
TDS - x 1 million
Going to bed, have to be up early. Will explain tolls tomorrow.
Drain The Swamp
Well, since the Arikara were the first tribe to inhabit the Black Hills, it seems that they have a reasonable claim to the Black Hills. But they were forced out through bloody wars and were followed by the Crow, the Pawnee, then the Kiowa, and then Cheyenne, before the Lakota Sioux took it.
And then, there's the United States. Yes, the Black Hills was taken by the United States no differently than by any other tribe which took it from the previous occupants. Yes, by force. So to me, it belongs to the last nation who fought for it and won it. Yes, the United States.
The Lakota-Sioux arrived in the West after being on the losing end of a war with other tribes in Minnesota in the late 1700s. Known as the Lakota, or simply the Sioux, they waged genocidal war on other tribes before they took over the Black Hills from the Cheyenne. So let me say this again, they did the exact same thing that the United States did to drive the Lakota out.
What I find interesting is that the history of the Black Hills points to the fact that the Black Hills didn't belong to the Lakota in the first place. It is also interesting that there is a movement to try to return the Black Hills to the Lakota, yet they are not its first occupants. The Lakota are saying it belongs to them, but historically its longest occupants were the Arikara Indians. And even if they don't want it, there were other tribe after them who occupied it much longer than the 100 years or less that the Sioux had it.
Can you just imagine if the United States said they were only going to turn over the land to the original occupants, the Arikara Indians? Or how about to the Cheyenne? Can you imagine the uproar by the Lakota? I do find it hypocritical for the Lakota to make claim to the Black Hill, when they in fact took it over after a bloody war with the Cheyenne that ended in 1776. In reality, they did the exact same thing the United States did a hundred years later in 1876.
Americans should not accept the lie that is being perpetuated regarding some aspects of American History. Who the Black Hills "belongs" to is one of the great lies.
Whether we want to admit it or not, it is a fact that Indian tribes waged war and slaughtered each other routinely. Each time a tribe chased out an enemy tribe, the victors were were conquerors. They took over lands, crops, game, made slaves of those they defeated no differently then the Germans and French did for centuries.
As for Native Americans saying they were here first. Where's here? Since those different tribes were independent nations with their own cultures. languages, customs, religious beliefs, completely separate from other Indian nations, all having pushed each other out of lands by force, who are they to say that the they were here first. Being first is irrelevant when they are not the last one's standing after a battle. They proved that by waging war on each other to conquer lands.
Until the United States came along, the Lakota were only the most recent Indian nation to occupy the Black Hills after a horrible war. Fact is, so many separate tribal nations have waged all out war to get the Black Hills. In the end, the Lakota-Sioux nation lost the Black Hills to the another nation which is the United States.
If we look at the United States no differently than we do any other tribal nation, then the United States is the last tribe to conquer a tribe that was occupying the Black Hills. After all, warfare being warfare, the United States took the Black Hills in the exact same way as as the other tribes did. Through brutal war, the United States did the very same thing. The United States fought for it. The United States conquered it, really no different than the Sioux did against the Cheyenne.
The hypocrisy of the Sioux today is their being mad at the United States for doing exactly what their ancestors did to other Indian tribes. That's the definition of being hypocrites. Americans got the Black Hills after a long line of other tribes fought for it. So, like it or not, the United States is the last tribe, the last nation, to get the Black Hills.
Another dead drop dropped
Not sure if the cloud seeding caused the snow. La Nina hitting the west coast this winter and all that solar output has the polar vortex spiralling out of sorts. Weather guy I watch was saying all the way to Tenn in the SE could get really cold this winter and he wouldn't be surprised if FL gets a good snow this winter.
Chief Joseph, a leader of the Nez Perce tribe, is renowned for his courageous resistance against U.S. government policies and his efforts to protect his people's ancestral lands during the Nez Perce War.
Early
Chief Joseph, born Hin-mah-too-yah-lat-kekt around March 3, 1840, in the Wallowa Valley of Oregon, became the leader of the Wallowa band of the Nez Perce tribe after his father's death in the early 1870s. The Nez Perce were known for their friendly relations with white settlers and their adaptability to changing circumstances, including the adoption of Christianity by many tribe members, including Chief Joseph himself, who was educated in a mission school.Wikipedia+1
The
In 1877, the U.S. government attempted to forcibly relocate the Nez Perce from their ancestral lands to a reservation in Idaho. Chief Joseph initially agreed to the relocation but changed his mind after a violent incident involving young Nez Perce men and white settlers. Fearing retaliation, he decided to lead his people—approximately 800 men, women, and children—on a long trek toward Canada, seeking asylum with Sitting Bull and the Lakota people.Wikipedia+1
Over the course of several months, Chief Joseph and his followers undertook a remarkable 1,170-mile (1,900 km) retreat, skillfully outmaneuvering U.S. Army forces that vastly outnumbered them. Despite facing numerous battles, Chief Joseph's leadership and the humane treatment of prisoners earned him admiration from both his own people and many white observers.
Wikipedia+1
Surrender
In October 1877, after a grueling campaign, Chief Joseph and his remaining followers were cornered just 40 miles from the Canadian border. Unable to continue the fight, he surrendered to U.S. forces, famously stating, "I will fight no more forever." His surrender marked the end of the Nez Perce War, but it did not bring peace to his people. They were initially held as prisoners of war and later relocated to various reservations, far from their homeland.Britannica+1
Chief Joseph spent the remainder of his life advocating for the rights of his people and the return of their lands. He died on September 21, 1904, on the Colville Reservation in Washington, reportedly of a broken heart due to the loss of his people's homeland. His legacy endures as a symbol of Native American resistance and dignity, and he is remembered for his eloquent speeches and commitment to justice for his people.
Wikipedia+2
Chief Joseph's story is a poignant reminder of the struggles faced by Native Americans during the westward expansion of the United States and the enduring impact of their fight for rights and recognition.
I lived in Wyo for a while back in the 90's. I met a Nez Perce indian who told me a different story about chief Joseph. He told me that the Nez Perce where in constant battle with another tribe and Joseph knew they needed to unite to fight the white man. So Joseph and the other chief went to the top of a mountain to fight one on one with the chief who returns being the chief of both tribes. Joseph returned down the hill holding the heart of the other chief and ate in front of the tribes. It's wild how they told stories about their leaders before it became politically correct to make all indians peaceful hippies.
