Sounds like a shitty plan
Why has Trump allowed Epstein's accomplices to walk free?
This is not an endorsement of Trump's position regarding Epstein's accomplices. It's an attempt to explain what might be going on in his mind.
John Durham only indicted three people connected to Spygate. Kevin Clinesmith was the only person convicted, and that was for lying to the FBI. Danchenko and Sussman were acquitted despite a mountain of evidence of their guilt.
The lesson learned from Spygate is that courts and jury pools are generally not inclined to convict those who wronged Trump.
Durham knew he had no chance of convicting Obama, Rice, Brennan, Clapper, or low-level operatives like Strzok & Page due to a politicized justice system.
If the DOJ prosecuted Democratic members of Congress for crimes related to Epstein, what do you imagine the odds would be of getting a conviction?
Zero.
Trump understands that it's a pointless effort trying to bring justice to corrupt elected leaders, which may be why he has given up on seeing justice for these matters from the past.
He has clearly turned his attention to issues over which he has control, such as closing the border, deporting illegal aliens, and fixing the economy.
He's not going to come out and tell the world our justice system is screwed, and that's why he has to let the Epstein crimes go, but that appears to be the realty we must live with.
I'm not saying I agree with this approach. I'm merely offering a logical thought process that might explain Trump's position.