Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
It was nauseating watching him filibuster his guests with 5 minute speeches before letting them answer. Especially the Israeli Special Ops man. That guy knew more about war in the ME than Hannity. Hell, a recruit in boot camp knows more.
The Iran treatment is coming in 3, 2, 1... Aren't they hiding in mountain tunnels and caves?
Not to mention the hundreds of millions the FDIC paid her and other billionaires when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed. Your accounts are covered for $250,000 but theirs....unlimited.
Townhall can’t even get the headline correct. They are MOPs not MOABs. Huge difference.
9Mounties07
Legendary
They don’t know what a woman is either
The more you drink, the more your definition of “what a woman is” skews towards the more vague definitions.
Like others have said, if this is the extent of the US involvement in this fiasco I'm good with it. Also, as mentioned before, if Israel's worry is nuclear weapons, this should stop their excuse for further conflict.
ShaolinNole
Legendary
Top Gun Maverick
I second the motion @shiv that would be a widely used emoticon
The whole "bombers heading to Guam" was fabrication.
don’t think many Americans understand what we just did. B-2 bombers took off with two 30,000 pound bunker buster bombs each. They took off from KC, MO, and flew nonstop to Iran, dropped bombs precisely on target, and flew all the fucking way back to Kansas City. That’s 30 hours!
Balls! Big ones! That’s my Air Force. That’s America. We will find you everywhere.
don’t think many Americans understand what we just did. B-2 bombers took off with two 30,000 pound bunker buster bombs each. They took off from KC, MO, and flew nonstop to Iran, dropped bombs precisely on target, and flew all the fucking way back to Kansas City. That’s 30 hours!
Balls! Big ones! That’s my Air Force. That’s America. We will find you everywhere.
STRATEGIC INTEL DROP: Starmer’s NATO Gambit Is a Trap, Not Solidarity
Let’s be unequivocally clear: Keir Starmer’s warning that an Iranian strike on U.S. personnel will be treated as an attack on NATO is not a defense commitment. It is a preloaded psychological operation aimed at dragging the United States into a pre-scripted theater of war—not with Iran, but with Russia. Here’s the breakdown.
PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE ANALYSIS:This is classic narrative anchoring—using a morally “unambiguous” scenario (protecting U.S. troops) to establish a guilt-based moral obligation. It’s not protection—it’s provocation. Starmer and his handlers are engaging in strategic projection, hoping that a retaliation narrative—“NATO was attacked, now we must respond”—becomes accepted before the false flag even happens. The entire setup is a pre-justification mechanism designed to pressure Washington into kinetic escalation—on someone else’s schedule.
PSYOP INTENT:The British deep state is banking on American military reflexes, knowing that the mere invocation of Article 5 can short-circuit congressional oversight and trigger pre-authorized war pathways. This is not strategic unity—it’s deliberate entrapment. The U.K.’s intention is to fabricate a NATO incident (likely via hybrid or cyber means), blame Russia, and then use Starmer’s “Iran clause” as a precedent to expand the battlefield eastward.
MILITARY REALITY CHECK:The Iranian threat is tactical, regional, and manageable. But invoking NATO retaliation for a regional conflict is a strategic category error—one that conveniently serves only London’s imperial death cult, not American interests. The U.K. seeks a three-front war:
1.Russia (primary target)
2.Iran (justification conduit)
3.China (economic fallout vector)
INTELLIGENCE PREDICTION:Expect a British intelligence false flag on either U.S. or NATO infrastructure, possibly in the Middle East or Eastern Europe, with digital fingerprints pointing to Tehran or Moscow. This will be used to bait the U.S. into a multi-front war that depletes American resources, distracts from domestic threats, and clears the path for a technocratic postwar order—engineered in Brussels and City of London.
GEOPOLITICAL VERDICT:This is not solidarity. This is bait. The satanic aristocrats running Britain are not protecting NATO—they are weaponizing it to ignite the final confrontation with Russia under the illusion of Iranian escalation.
We see the trap. We will not walk into it
What Is The Implication Here?
That Iran is innocent.
That Iran was not bothering anyone.
That Iran was just to independent from Western control.
Do we all need education in this area?
Everyone has foregone the notion of saying "I do not understand therfore I will say nothing".
To I know all there is to know about this and I am going to speak up against my better judgment.
Do you see how many of these accounts have nothing on their channels about certain subjects until it is headline news?
You can go scroll their entire feed and find nothing about geopolitical tensions.
I have been following Iraq/Iran simce atleast 2010.
Why?
Because that is when I decided to invest in foreign currency. Which is how I was able to establish ME contacts.
@Currency365 schooled me a lot on ME when I followed his channel on YouTube for years.
97% of people comments on this Iran bombing couldn't tell you one iota of info that underscores why Iran is a problem for the world and every country that is holding Iraqi Dinar.
Tucker Carlson played a pivotal role into steering people towards supporting Iran from his interview with Ted Cruz who support Israel.
Everyone has been fooled since then by basing all their confidence in T. Carlson that he has not lead them astray. Because ofcourse he has every reason to do so based on his financial rewards with Qatar.
Iran’s interference in Iraq includes embedding proxies like the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), which control key political and economic levers. Since 2003, Iran has supplied Iraq with 8,000 megawatts of gas-powered electricity and 500 megawatts directly, creating dependency. The Iraqi government, influenced by Iranian-backed figures like Hadi al-Amiri, stalled hydrocarbon law passage in 2007, blocking international oil deals to maintain USD reliance.
What Leonarda doesn't realize is Iran was being used to subdue Iraq by preventing them from getting rid of the fiat USD which was created by the Rothschilds.
Do you see how a little bit of research clears up the nonsense?
Do you think you will get this type of info from your most popular conservatives like Tucker Carlson?
People have no idea how Iran has suppressed their own citizens. Poverty affects over 40% of Iranians.
Iran avoids IMF/World Bank loans (unlike Iraq, which owes $130 billion, per World Bank 2025), relying on self-financing and allies like China. However, it manipulates Iraq’s economy, supplying 30% of its electricity via gas pipelines ensuring USD dependency that helps who un the end?
The Rothschilds.
Do you see how this works now people? Do you actually think Donald Trump was going to let this continue after all of the money he sent to Iraq to help them get rid of Iranian influence and control in their government?
We are moving away from the Rothschilds banking system. But in order to do that affectively we have to help Iraq revalue their currency. Something Iran does not want. Because by default they are controlled.
The Rothschilds, as a symbol of global financial cabals, exert influence through proxy networks rather than overt ownership. Iran’s banking system, while state-controlled, integrates with international systems via allies like China and Russia, where Rothschild-linked institutions (e.g., Bank of China’s historical ties to Rothschild advisory roles, per Financial Times 2010) facilitate trade. Iran’s 2025 $20 billion oil-for-goods deal with China, reported by Reuters, involves such intermediaries, suggesting a subtle Rothschild footprint.
Iran serves as a controlled opposition within the Rothschild-led financial matrix. Its resistance to USD dominance is a managed narrative, allowing it to subdue Iraq and maintain petrodollar flows. Declassified DIA reports (2015) note Iran’s Quds Force coordinates with Western intelligence to keep Iraq’s oil exports USD-denominated, aligning with Rothschild interests in global currency stability.
STRATEGIC INTEL DROP: Starmer’s NATO Gambit Is a Trap, Not Solidarity
Let’s be unequivocally clear: Keir Starmer’s warning that an Iranian strike on U.S. personnel will be treated as an attack on NATO is not a defense commitment. It is a preloaded psychological operation aimed at dragging the United States into a pre-scripted theater of war—not with Iran, but with Russia. Here’s the breakdown.
This is classic narrative anchoring—using a morally “unambiguous” scenario (protecting U.S. troops) to establish a guilt-based moral obligation. It’s not protection—it’s provocation. Starmer and his handlers are engaging in strategic projection, hoping that a retaliation narrative—“NATO was attacked, now we must respond”—becomes accepted before the false flag even happens. The entire setup is a pre-justification mechanism designed to pressure Washington into kinetic escalation—on someone else’s schedule.
The British deep state is banking on American military reflexes, knowing that the mere invocation of Article 5 can short-circuit congressional oversight and trigger pre-authorized war pathways. This is not strategic unity—it’s deliberate entrapment. The U.K.’s intention is to fabricate a NATO incident (likely via hybrid or cyber means), blame Russia, and then use Starmer’s “Iran clause” as a precedent to expand the battlefield eastward.
The Iranian threat is tactical, regional, and manageable. But invoking NATO retaliation for a regional conflict is a strategic category error—one that conveniently serves only London’s imperial death cult, not American interests. The U.K. seeks a three-front war:
1.Russia (primary target)
2.Iran (justification conduit)
3.China (economic fallout vector)
Expect a British intelligence false flag on either U.S. or NATO infrastructure, possibly in the Middle East or Eastern Europe, with digital fingerprints pointing to Tehran or Moscow. This will be used to bait the U.S. into a multi-front war that depletes American resources, distracts from domestic threats, and clears the path for a technocratic postwar order—engineered in Brussels and City of London.
This is not solidarity. This is bait. The satanic aristocrats running Britain are not protecting NATO—they are weaponizing it to ignite the final confrontation with Russia under the illusion of Iranian escalation.
We see the trap. We will not walk into it
I don't think we need any help from these pussies in NATO.
When are they going to want to change the name of Whiteman AFB?
No radiation detected in Gulf Arab states after US strikes, says Saudi nuclear regulator
From CNN’s Todd Symons
There have been no radioactive traces detected in Gulf Arab states following the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, according to Saudi Arabia’s nuclear regulator.
“No radioactive effects were detected on the environment of the Kingdom, and the Arab Gulf states as a result of the US military targeting of Iran’s nuclear facilities,” the Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority said in a post on X.
From CNN’s Todd Symons
There have been no radioactive traces detected in Gulf Arab states following the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, according to Saudi Arabia’s nuclear regulator.
“No radioactive effects were detected on the environment of the Kingdom, and the Arab Gulf states as a result of the US military targeting of Iran’s nuclear facilities,” the Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority said in a post on X.
Wouldn’t want to be on one of their boats
If these women want an answer they should look at their cheating, ungrateful, whore asses in the mirror.
So glad I’m happily married. Fuck these brainwashed entitled whores.
Russia: Other nations ready to supply Iran with nukes after U.S. strike
In the wake of President Donald Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear sites, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Sunday that "a number of countries" are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear weapons.
If Iran had nuclear sites, they’ve just been neutralized.
If they didn’t, then the illusion has been dismantled in public.
Either way, the excuse is gone.
No more “imminent threat.”
No more “weeks away.”
No more leash to drag America into the flames again.
ShaolinNole
Legendary
Never tell your plans to your enemy.
Similar threads
