Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
The Jews of the Bible - good.
The Azerkanzi-Zionist pieces of shit - evil.
Every major problem in the world in particular "Banking" can be tied to the Zionist pieces of shit.
I agree as someone who had to respond to that email. A little top cover goes a long way.
*Deport the Ukrainians.
*Women shouldn’t be allowed to vote.
*Fvxk Joy Reid.
Isn’t it clear what the intent of the e-mail was by now as Musk has stated the intended effect? DOGE is on to a major fraud scam (again) where payroll is being paid to “fake” employees…they were just flushing out the fakes to investigate
“Damage Control” meaning the responses of Gabbard, Hegseth and Patel? I think this was all planned as to keep the criminals still under one roof. I think the “paycheck” fraud scheme is likely in other agencies where they could “hide” easily…..Odd to me those 3 named above preside over where 80% of the criminals/traitors are located…..
A literal nazi.
No, the responses of cabinet members picked by Trump telling us to wait until Monday to respond until we gain clarity.
We're going to find out there are more fake and dead federal employees receiving a paycheck than actual federal employees.
I hope they get posted soon, though there is a thought to keep the guilty party's on edge as long as possible. Even to the point of hinting they may not get released ( use a mole reporter), then drop them at 2 AM so all the scum can wake up to their nightmare
Would take less than a week to obliterate all their Tacomas.
Three American women found dead with ‘alcohol and some gummies’ at Belize beach resort
Three American women were found dead at a beach resort in Belize in what authorities say may have been a possible drug overdose after finding “alcohol and some gummies” in their hotel r…
nypost.com
Tech guru admired by Elon Musk estimates ‘over $100 billion’ in taxpayer money is being wasted or stolen
The tech expert is using artificial intelligence to expose cases of government waste, fraud and abuse and goes by “DataRepublican” on X, where her posts are regularly shared by Elon Musk.
nypost.com
Exclusive | Zizian cult defector believed to have died in 2022 has been in hiding, fearing maniac vegan group’s revenge
A former Zizian cult member widely believed to have died by suicide is actually alive and hiding from the “dangerous” group, The Post can reveal.
nypost.com
North Carolina 16-year-old breaks down, cries for ‘Mama’ after being charged as adult for murder under new state law
“(You’re) out here doing big boy things, and this is what’s going to happen. You got to suffer the consequences.”
nypost.com
Understand your concern, but it was a trap to find non working individuals/accounts. It is too difficult to investigate the entire system, so now they have a starting place of those that didn't respond. Much ado about nothing cause of social media and press blowing it out of proportion.
I think the Saturday request was to identify the bots that responded. The real people that responded are clearly ok with working for the Trump administration. That’s a W to identify. But I’d wager 90% of the accounts that responded on Saturday are who they are really looking for. Ghosts in the machine. Now where is that money going? Who is managing these accounts.
The fog of war is thick..
N.C.S.W.I.C.
The fog of war is thick..
N.C.S.W.I.C.
Last edited:
AgEngDawg
Legendary
Georgia's Kirby Smart takes swipe at Johnny Manziel: 'Champion of Fireball'
Georgia Bulldogs football head coach Kirby Smart appeared to take a shot at former star quarterback Johnny Manziel during a coaching clinic.
Goldhedge
Legendary
Trump releases pot prisoners jailed for life under Biden’s 1994 crime bill
By Steven NelsonPublished Jan. 20, 2021
President Donald Trump on Wednesday released seven prisoners with life sentences for marijuana — including some jailed without parole under President-elect Joe Biden’s 1994 crime bill.
Paraplegic Michael Pelletier, 65, and Corvain Cooper, 41, are among the men who received prison commutations from Trump.
Pelletier had a life sentence for smuggling pot from Canada into Maine in the early 2000s. Both jurisdictions later legalized the drug.
Cooper had a life sentence for his role transporting marijuana from California to North Carolina, also under the three-strikes provision of Biden’s law.
more
Trump releases pot prisoners jailed for life under Biden’s 1994 crime bill
President Donald Trump on Wednesday released seven prisoners with life sentences for marijuana — including some jailed without parole under President-elect Joe Biden’s 1994 crime bill. Parapl…
nypost.com
Don't fire them. Arrest em and hang em at GITMO
Contempt and Consequence: The Case for Court-Martialing Insubordinate Flag Officers
@amuse
@amuse
·
1h
Subscribe
The Uniform Code of Military Justice is not an antiquated relic; it is the bedrock of military discipline and the safeguard of democratic governance. It now stands as the last barrier between order and chaos as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth faces a defining test. The issue at hand is not a minor breach of protocol—it is a blatant insubordination that strikes at the heart of civilian control over the military. Certain retired flag officers have violated Articles 88 and 133 with reckless impunity, and the only question that remains is whether this administration will have the resolve to restore discipline. If these officers are not held accountable, the implications are dire: the erosion of civilian authority, the unchecked defiance of military elites, and a crisis of governance that imperils the Republic itself. The UCMJ is unambiguous: retirees remain subject to its jurisdiction, and their calculated insubordination is a threat that must be met with decisive action.
To understand the necessity of these court-martials, one must first examine the governing statutes. Article 88 explicitly prohibits commissioned officers from using "contemptuous words" against the President. The intent of this article is clear: military officers, entrusted with the nation's defense, must remain apolitical in their conduct, their fealty bound to the Constitution and the chain of command rather than personal grievances. Article 133, which addresses conduct unbecoming an officer, extends beyond overt insubordination, encompassing actions and statements that erode the dignity and discipline expected of senior military leaders. The retired officers who have engaged in public, venomous attacks against President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have violated both.
These officers are not mere commentators or private citizens exercising their First Amendment rights unencumbered. They are retired generals and admirals who continue to receive government pensions, a reminder that they remain, in legal terms, part of the armed forces. They enjoy privileges from their service, from security clearances to advisory roles, yet they have weaponized their prominence to undermine the legitimacy of a duly elected president. This is not about policy disagreements; this is about a cadre of military elites who believe they are above the democratic system they swore to defend. Their public statements, laden with disdain and outright contempt, have emboldened insubordination among the ranks, threatening good order and discipline.
One of the most egregious examples is that of retired General James Mattis. His public letter in 2020, in which he excoriated President Trump as a divisive leader who "does not even pretend to try" to unite the country, was a blatant violation of Article 88. While cloaked in the language of statesmanship, Mattis’s words were intended to delegitimize the Commander-in-Chief in the eyes of the armed forces. He was not alone. Admiral Mike Mullen, another former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, claimed he was "sickened" by Trump's use of military force to quell violent riots, a remark that cast doubt on the administration's lawful exercise of authority. Admiral William McRaven went so far as to declare that Trump was "destroying" the country, an inflammatory statement unbecoming of an officer and clearly contemptuous under the UCMJ.
Other notable examples include General John Allen called Trump's leadership "the beginning of the end of American democracy." General Martin Dempsey publicly warned against the use of troops domestically, a direct rebuke of the Commander-in-Chief’s authority. General Colin Powell declared that "Trump lies" and had "drifted away from the Constitution." General Stanley McChrystal labeled Trump "immoral" and untruthful. General John Kelly openly questioned Trump's character and honesty. These statements were not policy critiques; they were outright attacks on the legitimacy of civilian leadership.
The contempt did not cease with Trump’s presidency. These same figures, along with General Mark Milley, continued their insubordination by directing their ire toward Secretary Hegseth, undermining his authority before he had even begun his tenure. Milley, who served as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs under Trump, has reportedly called the new Secretary of Defense "unfit for command," a direct attack that carries the weight of his former office. General Barry McCaffrey questioned Hegseth’s judgment and ethics, while General Lloyd Austin rebuked Hegseth’s stance on women in combat, declaring "enough already." Major General William Enyart dismissed Hegseth as "spectacularly unqualified." These are not mere critiques of policy but attempts to delegitimize the administration’s authority.
The result? A Pentagon where senior officers feel emboldened to openly question the legitimacy of their civilian overseers. The military is not a debating society. It is an institution predicated on hierarchy, order, and unwavering discipline. If those at the highest echelons of command believe they can openly defy civilian leadership without consequence, what message does that send to the lower ranks?
This is not a slippery slope argument; it is a reality already unfolding. Recent reports indicate an increase in officers speaking out against administration policies, citing the precedent set by these retired flag officers. The failure to act decisively now will only exacerbate this problem. A military that allows its senior leaders—active or retired—to publicly attack the legitimacy of its Commander-in-Chief is a military on the path to lawlessness. Today, it is public letters and interviews. Tomorrow, it is coordinated disobedience.
Some will argue that court-martialing retired officers for their words is excessive, even authoritarian. This is nonsense. The precedent for disciplining retired officers is well-established. For example, in 1921, retired Major General Peter C. Harris was reprimanded for public criticisms of the War Department. More recently, in 2010, retired Army Brigadier General Janis Karpinski was demoted for conduct unbecoming an officer. The UCMJ applies to them for this very reason: to ensure that their conduct does not degrade the integrity of the military. To suggest that Mattis, Mullen, McRaven, Milley, and their ilk should be exempt is to assert that senior officers deserve privileges that the rank-and-file do not. A private in the Army who publicly called the President a "threat to the Constitution" would face swift disciplinary action. That generals have been able to say as much, and worse, without consequence is an injustice that must be rectified.
The enforcement of Articles 88 and 133 against these individuals is not a matter of retribution; it is a matter of maintaining discipline, ensuring respect for the chain of command, and upholding the principle that military leaders serve under civilian authority. The Biden administration turned a blind eye to the contemptuous rhetoric from these figures because it was politically expedient. The Trump administration must not repeat that mistake. If Secretary Hegseth allows these violations to go unpunished, he will not only undermine his own authority but embolden future insubordination. These men must be made an example of. The future of civilian-military relations depends on it.
Similar threads
