- Joined
- Dec 9, 2020
- Messages
- 25,861
Sometimes when you reach mile markers in the research journey, you find something that makes you pause, rethink the previous questions and then quickly dispatch the new information.
This is one of those markers.
Many people, including RFK Jr himself and his legal team in court filings, have presented the situation and asked a question.
Essentially:
Why did the DNC apparatus sue to keep RFK JR's name off certain state ballots and simultaneously sue to keep him on certain state ballots?
It just didn't make sense....... Until now.
Ballots were contracted for localized printing by those who intended to use the blanks for fraudulent purposes.
RFK Jr's name ON or OFF ballots, changed the dynamic of the physical paper. The tabulation scanners need one ballot format per precinct to scan for vote tally.
In states where they preprinted the fraudulent county level ballots *without* RFK Jr's name, the DNC sued to keep him off.
In states where they preprinted the fraudulent county level ballots *with* RFK Jr's name, the DNC sued to keep him on.
That's the answer.