• In Memory of Rebarcock.

    As we navigate life without Pat 'Rebarcock.' Flood, who passed on Sept 21, 2025, we continue to remember the profound impact he had on our community. His support was a cornerstone for our forum. We encourage you to visit the memorial thread to share your memories and condolences. In honor of Pat’s love for storytelling, please contribute to his ‘Rebarcock tells a story’ thread. Your stories will help keep his spirit alive among us.

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
I remember in 8th grade my best friends parents went out of town for the weekend. So we drank a bottle of Courvoisier from the cabinet and smoked all his old man’s cigars. He was pissed! SKOL!
When I went into the Navy, my sister found my bottle of Gin in the closet. She and her friends drank it. At least it save my Dad from finding it although he tossed all my baseball cards from the 50s and 60s.
 


 

We Dont though. Nobody does. ITs Fucking over. They lie cheat steal then do whatever the fuck they want. We have nothing at all. Nothing is going to happen. Those 3 patriot heros died in vain. Its sad but we are done as a country. No repercussions No accountability. If they say you raped her. You raped her. If they say you are a racist. you are a racist. If one of them say they went to the moon. they went to the moon
 
We Dont though. Nobody does. ITs Fucking over. They lie cheat steal then do whatever the fuck they want. We have nothing at all. Nothing is going to happen. Those 3 patriot heros died in vain. Its sad but we are done as a country. No repercussions No accountability. If they say you raped her. You raped her. If they say you are a racist. you are a racist. If one of them say they went to the moon. they went to the moon
Don’t give up this easily. That’s what they want.
 
We Dont though. Nobody does. ITs Fucking over. They lie cheat steal then do whatever the fuck they want. We have nothing at all. Nothing is going to happen. Those 3 patriot heros died in vain. Its sad but we are done as a country. No repercussions No accountability. If they say you raped her. You raped her. If they say you are a racist. you are a racist. If one of them say they went to the moon. they went to the moon

Last night in GEORGEnews live chat
20210205_072105.jpg
 
Last night in GEORGEnews live chat
View attachment 5477
Correct. They will continue to ruin our country and our society. We are the strongest country in the world and we are the only country bowing and giving it up. ITs the perfect example of everybody gets a trophy. It is far from over bc they have no plan and no end game they will just continue to whale down the path of destruction. George News sees what we all see, but Georgenews hasnt a clue. They just hope something will be done. Like we all do.
 
Correct. They will continue to ruin our country and our society. We are the strongest country in the world and we are the only country bowing and giving it up. ITs the perfect example of everybody gets a trophy. It is far from over bc they have no plan and no end game they will just continue to whale down the path of destruction. George News sees what we all see, but Georgenews hasnt a clue. They just hope something will be done. Like we all do.
Well sir, I suggest finding a Facebook group to air out your morning dispair. I'd like to believe most in here are far from giving up hope and are doing our parts to keep waking up people in our immediate personal spheres, while trying to keep spirits high.

You're free to keep chirping, but know you sound like a bitch.
 
Last edited:
whats is Georgenews?
Back in the 90s, JFK Jr started & edited a magazine called George.

Since I've been paying attention post election day & more so post Jan 20, George News has been doing nightly YouTube chatrooms for folks to chat, with some slight interaction from "George". Interestingly, George News would post live locations from the White House, various Trump hotels/towers, and Mar-a-lago. Clearly, not just any "media" source. Last night, the location was Trump Tower in NYC.
 
I guess they are wanting to see a battle in our own land. From our congressman Jeff Duncan.

I've received many questions about HR 127, The Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act introduced by Congresswoman Jackson Lee.

First of all, this is one of those bills that's actually worse than what you've probably heard. It also proves that yes, there are plenty of politicians out there who want to take your guns.

Here's an overview of the legislation:
1) Establishes a firearms registration system within the ATF

2) Registered individuals must notify the ATF every time they loan their firearms

3) May not loan firearms to anyone under the age of 18, does not seem to have any exception for hunting or recreation

4) All firearms acquired before this legislation must also be registered

5) Creates a firearms and ammunition licensing system

6) Must be in possession in order to purchase or posses firearms or ammunition

7) Must be 21 years old to obtain a license

8) Must go through psychological evaluation

9) Must have firearms insurance, like car insurance, to cover damages resulting from the use of any firearm by the person

10) Need a separate license for Antique Firearm Display

11) Must describe how it will be displayed and demonstrate that it is stored in a manner as approved by the AG.

12) Need a separate license for “Military-Style Weapons”

13) Licenses may be suspended if individual is under indictment, not even charged, for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.

14) Must renew licenses every year for 5 years, then once every three years (this provision has already been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, but the author doesn't seem to care).

15) Prohibits possession of certain ammunition, and based on my reading does not provide an exception for shotguns, so 12 and 20 gauge could be prohibited under this legislation.

16) Prohibits “large” capacity feeding devices (10 rounds)

17) Possessing a firearm or ammunition without a license and registration is a minimum fine of $75K and minimum sentence of 15 years

18) Transferring a firearm or ammunition to a person who is not licensed is a minimum fine of $50K and minimum sentence of 10 years

19) Selling or giving a firearm or ammunition without notifying the Attorney General is a minimum fine of $30K and minimum sentence of 5 years

20) Loaning a firearm or ammunition without notifying AG is a minimum fine of $5K

21) Transferring firearm to an individual under 18 is a minimum fine of $75K and minimum sentence of 15 years.

This bill is designed to scare people out of gun ownership. The penalties are so steep, and the rules so strict that the chances of a law abiding citizen accidentally breaking the law is high, and it goes without saying that this bill is a clear violation of the Second Amendment.

I will absolutely, 100% oppose this bill with every fiber of my being. I will be tracking this legislation closely, and if it moves an inch in Congress, I will be the first to sound the alarm.
 
After reading both documents front to back I'd disagree with that interpretation of the documents.

I'd also say that no act of Congress overrides the Constitution so the idea of an act being able to do those things is impossible. Only amendments can change the Constitution. Unconstitutional acts can be followed or appear to be the law of the land even for hundreds of years but that doesn't make them Constitutional.

Keeping in mind that the Constitution wasn't ratified until after the Articles of Confederation I'd be open to trying to read ever document from 1783 through the ratification of the Constitution but even if there were documents that we don't know about it's my understanding that the Constitution would have made them mute upon ratification since it doesn't outline or keep in tact those unknown documents.

I'm open to more information, documents, or the idea that documents I've read were changed in some way but I'd need or could go through the library of Congress to confirm those things.


[/URL][/URL][/URL]

[/URL][/URL][/URL]

just curious what your interpretation was.

just before chapter 62, it’s allocating money to a few different debts in the tens of thousands. And then 300 thousand to puget sound, owned by Hudson’s bay company. During this time HBC was owned by Rothschild‘s Inernational Financial Society.
Is goes right into titled “an act to provide a government for the District of Columbia”.
First, is that even constitutional? could the federal government vote to not recognize any other states government and “provide” them another one?
Second, the District of Columbia is 10 square miles, why would it need a new government with a new legislative body? I honestly don’t know, but weird that it encompasses the US capital.
Third, it states in the first paragraph of chapter 62, that the new government will be a corporation.
Fourth, it refers to its legislative powers being consistent with the Constitution of the United States. If you read the preamble, it clearly states that it is the Constitution for the United States of America. Well no big deal, right? Everything you look at now says constitution of the United States. Look up legal definition of “of” and the legal definition of “for“. There’s a huge difference.
Finally, you are correct regarding the constitution created by the people, it can’t be changed by congress, and it still applies to our country. It is the law of the land. But it doesn’t apply when you make any contract with the District of Columbia, and operate under their title, your birth certificate, SSN, Drivers license. You then fall under the constitution created by the US.
I‘m in healthcare, I know Jack shit about our legal system. But I know when something doesn’t look or smell right, and that if it doesn’t make sense, it ain’t what it looks like. Legal definitions of simple words, made things a lot more clear. Try doing ”person”.
 
I have no idea how old my bottle is. The cork was dry enough that I had to get a wine key and carefully ease it out...in pieces.

Like you said, I think it would be better rx. I just took a small shot. I didn't hate it, but it's not something I would normally imbibe. But I can see how it would be good with a good cigar (and yes, he loves cigars and I normally take a puff or 3)
My go to sipper has been Drambuie. Always have a bottle in my golf bag for anyone making a birdie or better.
 
B&B is a great after dinner drink. An aperitif. I always have a bottle on hand.

I prefer it in the rocks. Just sip after dinner. Like a port, it is also great with a cigar. In case Husband likes those.

B&B is sweet, like a port.

Cognac is not sweet. Cognac is a high end brandy. It is more like sipping a high end Bourbon or Scotch. Cognac is Typically consumed straight in a Brandy snifter. You hold the bowl with your hand so that you warm the Cognac and release the aroma. Sniff deep and sip lightly.

My preferred Cognac is

Courvoisier XO​

@jdgnole
Thanks, I researched and will get the one you recommended, some golf buddies in Mississippi enjoy some with a cigar here and there.
 
I guess they are wanting to see a battle in our own land. From our congressman Jeff Duncan.

I've received many questions about HR 127, The Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act introduced by Congresswoman Jackson Lee.

First of all, this is one of those bills that's actually worse than what you've probably heard. It also proves that yes, there are plenty of politicians out there who want to take your guns.

Here's an overview of the legislation:
1) Establishes a firearms registration system within the ATF

2) Registered individuals must notify the ATF every time they loan their firearms

3) May not loan firearms to anyone under the age of 18, does not seem to have any exception for hunting or recreation

4) All firearms acquired before this legislation must also be registered

5) Creates a firearms and ammunition licensing system

6) Must be in possession in order to purchase or posses firearms or ammunition

7) Must be 21 years old to obtain a license

8) Must go through psychological evaluation

9) Must have firearms insurance, like car insurance, to cover damages resulting from the use of any firearm by the person

10) Need a separate license for Antique Firearm Display

11) Must describe how it will be displayed and demonstrate that it is stored in a manner as approved by the AG.

12) Need a separate license for “Military-Style Weapons”

13) Licenses may be suspended if individual is under indictment, not even charged, for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.

14) Must renew licenses every year for 5 years, then once every three years (this provision has already been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, but the author doesn't seem to care).

15) Prohibits possession of certain ammunition, and based on my reading does not provide an exception for shotguns, so 12 and 20 gauge could be prohibited under this legislation.

16) Prohibits “large” capacity feeding devices (10 rounds)

17) Possessing a firearm or ammunition without a license and registration is a minimum fine of $75K and minimum sentence of 15 years

18) Transferring a firearm or ammunition to a person who is not licensed is a minimum fine of $50K and minimum sentence of 10 years

19) Selling or giving a firearm or ammunition without notifying the Attorney General is a minimum fine of $30K and minimum sentence of 5 years

20) Loaning a firearm or ammunition without notifying AG is a minimum fine of $5K

21) Transferring firearm to an individual under 18 is a minimum fine of $75K and minimum sentence of 15 years.

This bill is designed to scare people out of gun ownership. The penalties are so steep, and the rules so strict that the chances of a law abiding citizen accidentally breaking the law is high, and it goes without saying that this bill is a clear violation of the Second Amendment.

I will absolutely, 100% oppose this bill with every fiber of my being. I will be tracking this legislation closely, and if it moves an inch in Congress, I will be the first to sound the alarm.
 
Back
Top Bottom