• In Memory of Rebarcock.

    As we navigate life without Pat 'Rebarcock.' Flood, who passed on Sept 21, 2025, we continue to remember the profound impact he had on our community. His support was a cornerstone for our forum. We encourage you to visit the memorial thread to share your memories and condolences. In honor of Pat’s love for storytelling, please contribute to his ‘Rebarcock tells a story’ thread. Your stories will help keep his spirit alive among us.

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
And who do you think will be financing Civil War 2.0?
good question. Although I don’t believe there is going to ever be another civil war.
Hear me out, if we are to believe that elections were rigged for a while, they have control of even local politicians, they command our military, they can print a bajillion dollars. Why they need for censorship, lies, propaganda, or even the optics of a fair election? Because without us, they are powerless. Once we turn on them, their statutory laws mean nothing, our military doesn’t work for them any longer, and they lose trillions in revenue. Ppl just gotta wake up. We are the sleeping giant.
 
There are many people's livelihoods depending on the current system. The race industry, political consultants, election officials, advertisers, media, politicians themselves, etc. all have a vested interest in keeping things as they are. Paper ballots, voter ID, slicing/dicing the eligibility rolls, all encroach on someone's pocketbook.
100% spot on.

Just not sure how we could get voter ID without an amendment. Would seem to encroach on state legs right to conduct elections.

Any lawyers wanna break this down for us?
 
good question. Although I don’t believe there is going to ever be another civil war.
Hear me out, if we are to believe that elections were rigged for a while, they have control of even local politicians, they command our military, they can print a bajillion dollars. Why they need for censorship, lies, propaganda, or even the optics of a fair election? Because without us, they are powerless. Once we turn on them, their statutory laws mean nothing, our military doesn’t work for them any longer, and they lose trillions in revenue. Ppl just gotta wake up. We are the sleeping giant.
I'd agree with 99% of this other than every pol being controlled.

It's obvious some slip through the cracks / sometimes they can't get enough rigging in place (Trump, MTG, Ron and Rand).
 
100% spot on.

Just not sure how we could get voter ID without an amendment. Would seem to encroach on state legs right to conduct elections.

Any lawyers wanna break this down for us?
Not a lawyer but fairly simple to figure out. If you want fed $$ you will have paper ballots with ID in any election. Mail in ballots by request only and only when request is accompanied by ID. Even the libs couldn't fk this up.
 

He shouldn’t testify if he is trying to limit his defense to the jurisdictional argument. (He is not a sitting President and cannot, therefore, be removed. The trial is a legal nullity).

If he was going to consider testifying it would be on the issues of his right to make the statements he made about the election, the veracity of those statements and whether those statements and his speech amounted to an insurrection. He might consider testifying on the condition that he be granted full discovery rights on election legitimacy and fraud issues to include enforceable subpoena power. Of course Senate Dems will never agree to that. If he can’t put on evidence corroborating his position that the election was illegitimate he shouldn’t testify.

I know President Trump likes to fight and has extreme confidence in his ability to persuade and win people over. His experience has justifiably given him that confidence but that doesn’t always work out. This would be like going to a knife fight in a straight jacket.

The letter requesting his appearance is a PR stunt. If they were serious they would have reached out to his attorneys.

TLDR: No he shouldn’t appear.
 
He shouldn’t testify if he is trying to limit his defense to the jurisdictional argument. (He is not a sitting President and cannot, therefore, be removed. The trial is a legal nullity).

If he was going to consider testifying it would be on the issues of his right to make the statements he made about the election, the veracity of those statements and whether those statements and his speech amounted to an insurrection. He might consider testifying on the condition that he be granted full discovery rights on election legitimacy and fraud issues to include enforceable subpoena power. Of course Senate Dems will never agree to that. If he can’t put on evidence corroborating his position that the election was illegitimate he shouldn’t testify.

I know President Trump likes to fight and has extreme confidence in his ability to persuade and win people over. His experience has justifiably given him that confidence but that doesn’t always work out. This would be like going to a knife fight in a straight jacket.

The letter requesting his appearance is a PR stunt. If they were serious they would have reached out to his attorneys.

TLDR: No he shouldn’t appear.
The only thing that comes of his testifying is a set-up for some bs perjury claim in the future. Its like a dem insurance policy
 
Not crush. Just plunge the nation into choas and make everything here look like Afghanistan. If the goal is to have a country your children can grow up in making the US a worn torn wasteland isn't going to help them. Living out of caves and dodging bombs isn't exactly going to make the next generation love America.

Also you question assumes the military was doing everything in their power to get the Taliban which we all know is silly. They need the war on terror to continue so they can do their swamp thing.
I’ll live in a bombed out America that’s in a constant state of war before I kneel to the globalists and hand over America without firing a single shot. JMO, but I’m having a hard time see any other option right now. I truly believe that if a legit rebel army was formed to restore the republic, thousands of people working within the military and in the civilian world would turn on their superiors who don’t support the constitution. I know I sure as hell would.
I agree with your second point about handcuffing the troops.
 
Not a lawyer but fairly simple to figure out. If you want fed $$ you will have paper ballots with ID in any election. Mail in ballots by request only and only when request is accompanied by ID. Even the libs couldn't fk this up.
I still don't understand how it would be Constitutional.

It's not like they can retroactively tie fed $$$ to voting. That shit would get overturned quickly I'd guess.
 
China News Network headline right now is ‘Biden declares America is back’ and the article goes on to state he will be upping the refugee cap from 15,000/year under the Trump administration to 125,000/year. That’s some serious mental gymnastics.

Minneapolis has been destroyed and we got Ilhan Omar from Obama’s progressive refugee policy. Wonder which city will be destroyed as a result of this new progressive policy change?

Jbfc. Smdh.
 
When they stop with the mask crap I’ll stop with the helmet crap.

I actually started it when talking to my wife about car seats for kids. The state of Florida requires you to use seats as recommended by the manufacturer. So the people who sell you these seats get to pick who uses them and how they are used. How much sense does that make?
Brought to us by the same type of people that have to be told not to use a toaster in the tub or that babies shouldn't be sealed up in plastic bags. At some point they have to realize they can't dumb everything down to the lowest level so everyone understands. 🤪 When they think they have everything covered, some dumbass puts his new RV on cruise control and leaves the wheel to fix a sandwich is filing lawsuits because he crashed. I mean they take the "nobody could be this dumb" as a daily challenge.
 

View attachment 5325
All these orders from Judges will play well in Giuliani's, Powell's and others lawsuits and counter-suits with and against Dominion, Smartmatic and Big Tech. This assumes there is no "losing" of files and data beforehand.
 
Not a lawyer but fairly simple to figure out. If you want fed $$ you will have paper ballots with ID in any election. Mail in ballots by request only and only when request is accompanied by ID. Even the libs couldn't fk this up.
Racist and disenfranchising. Funny, you don't hear anyone screaming racist and disenfranchising at banks or others who require photo IDs to do any business.
 
Back
Top Bottom