Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Sounds a lot like what the average German citizen would have said as they stood at the Tribute and cheered the Wehrmacht as it marched and rolled by.

There is little more than a trace of legitimate authority left in America. The constitution is largely disregarded from the highest court in the land down to those policeman treating an old man like an animal. The last election, the continued prosecution and persecution of people based on their political beliefs, treatment of people based solely on their skin color, etc, should have shown that to everyone, in spades.
You’re an idiot. Absolute idiot. There are men and women that wear the uniform daily that work to protect our society.

What do you do for a living? Let’s find bad ones and castigate you too. See how dumb that is? You probably don’t.
 
While it may become true when/if the data comes out, that headline is grossly misleading and they even say it in the first few paragraphs.

A lawsuit filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency produced documents from Pfizer showing that its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” caused all of the pregnant mothers on whom it was tested to miscarry.

“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).”

Taken at face value, this would suggest that of 270 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions, five “outcomes pending,” two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one normal outcome. However, there is also that tricky statement:
“no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

238 pregnancies have no known outcome from this trial. There's also little data on when these events happened, below:

Exposure during pregnancy (29) and Maternal exposure timing unspecified (6). Trimester of exposure was reported in 21 of these cases: 1st trimester (15 cases), 2nd trimester (7), and 3rd trimester (2).

As many of us have found out, miscarriages do happen more frequently in the first trimester (we had one last year) that these cases could be in line with what "normal" is for pregnancy.

They could also be due to the shot but that's pretty hard to tell from that data set.
I read your highlighted part when I first read the article. Any scientists want to weigh in on how they could lose track of 90% of the subjects in a study? As you said, nothing to see here. Seems 10-20% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. This study had 32 of 270 which is 15.5%, so the vaccines have no impact on those numbers but for those pesky 238 unreported. Knowing these drug lords they werent included because that would have taken their number into an eyebrow raising percentage. But you are correct, nothing to see here.
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
And they should be held personally liable for their actions. No immunity permitted.
Gotta disagree with you about the personal liability. We would not have any police if that was the case. It would also be a disadvantage for people who have a civil case since an officer's personal policy would likely have much lower coverage that a department policy. When people are employed and acting as an agent of a corporation or government, then it is the responsibility of that entity to insure their agent.

I downloaded the report referenced in that article, and it does not say that every expecting mother lost her baby. From my reading (section 3.1, table 6), there were 270 expecting mothers, and 28 miscarriages. 10% seems like a very large percentage, but I don't know what would be the expected percentage. It's definitely NOT 100% though, and Natural News loses credibility on this.
 
While it may become true when/if the data comes out, that headline is grossly misleading and they even say it in the first few paragraphs.

A lawsuit filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency produced documents from Pfizer showing that its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” caused all of the pregnant mothers on whom it was tested to miscarry.

“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).”

Taken at face value, this would suggest that of 270 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions, five “outcomes pending,” two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one normal outcome. However, there is also that tricky statement:
“no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

238 pregnancies have no known outcome from this trial. There's also little data on when these events happened, below:

Exposure during pregnancy (29) and Maternal exposure timing unspecified (6). Trimester of exposure was reported in 21 of these cases: 1st trimester (15 cases), 2nd trimester (7), and 3rd trimester (2).

As many of us have found out, miscarriages do happen more frequently in the first trimester (we had one last year) that these cases could be in line with what "normal" is for pregnancy.

They could also be due to the shot but that's pretty hard to tell from that data set.
Yeah, how do you do a study and provide no outcome? Even if those 238 survived, what were the number or other issues that those babies had? Were they all 100% healthy? Did any have heart, lung, or auto immune issues of any kind? That information is hugely important, in addition to the fact that a minimum of 12% miscarried during the pregnancy.
 
Gotta disagree with you about the personal liability. We would not have any police if that was the case. It would also be a disadvantage for people who have a civil case since an officer's personal policy would likely have much lower coverage that a department policy. When people are employed and acting as an agent of a corporation or government, then it is the responsibility of that entity to insure their agent.


I downloaded the report referenced in that article, and it does not say that every expecting mother lost her baby. From my reading (section 3.1, table 6), there were 270 expecting mothers, and 28 miscarriages. 10% seems like a very large percentage, but I don't know what would be the expected percentage. It's definitely NOT 100% though, and Natural News loses credibility on this.
I think the point was that the reports did not indicate any outcome for the other 242 pregnancies. How did they end up? Were the babies born? Did they have any defects or health issues? Just no data at all, which is sketchy to say the least
 
good-that-boy-good.gif
 
I think the point was that the reports did not indicate any outcome for the other 242 pregnancies. How did they end up? Were the babies born? Did they have any defects or health issues? Just no data at all, which is sketchy to say the least
If there were no adverse reactions to speak of in the other 238, they would have reported it and sung it out from the mountain tops. They did what places do that do not want info public.
 
Gotta disagree with you about the personal liability. We would not have any police if that was the case. It would also be a disadvantage for people who have a civil case since an officer's personal policy would likely have much lower coverage that a department policy. When people are employed and acting as an agent of a corporation or government, then it is the responsibility of that entity to insure their agent.


I downloaded the report referenced in that article, and it does not say that every expecting mother lost her baby. From my reading (section 3.1, table 6), there were 270 expecting mothers, and 28 miscarriages. 10% seems like a very large percentage, but I don't know what would be the expected percentage. It's definitely NOT 100% though, and Natural News loses credibility on this.
There are certain crimes committed by agents of Government that they absolutely should not be granted Immunity for committing.
 
That’s exactly how eye feel about the things eye listed previously and many of the other completely insincere shit yew sea ITT about the vaccines.
Dude. I don’t really care what you say either way but you need a knock off the schtick of spelling words purposefully incorrectly. It immediately negates anything you say in most people’s eyes. Because no one can take you seriously when you do that. Even if you’re trying to make a serious, salient point. No one will give a shit because of the way you’re spelling words just to annoy others. You have reduced the value that your thoughts hold because of this schtick.
 
Eye couldn’t imagine trying to actually suggest this with a straight face.

We both know they are better than advertised.

And yes the definition was updated when the technology was widely adopted.

Good try. The technology was adopted when it was administered. The definition did not change until much later. Keep spinning
 
Last edited:
While it may become true when/if the data comes out, that headline is grossly misleading and they even say it in the first few paragraphs.

A lawsuit filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency produced documents from Pfizer showing that its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” caused all of the pregnant mothers on whom it was tested to miscarry.

“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).”

Taken at face value, this would suggest that of 270 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions, five “outcomes pending,” two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one normal outcome. However, there is also that tricky statement:
“no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

238 pregnancies have no known outcome from this trial. There's also little data on when these events happened, below:

Exposure during pregnancy (29) and Maternal exposure timing unspecified (6). Trimester of exposure was reported in 21 of these cases: 1st trimester (15 cases), 2nd trimester (7), and 3rd trimester (2).

As many of us have found out, miscarriages do happen more frequently in the first trimester (we had one last year) that these cases could be in line with what "normal" is for pregnancy.

They could also be due to the shot but that's pretty hard to tell from that data set.
If you take 238 (no outcome) away from the 270 at the start that leaves 32 with one or more of the outcomes described. In other words, over 100% of those reported had significant negative outcomes. I'm guessing all 270 did.
 
Dude. I don’t really care what you say either way but you need a knock off the schtick of spelling words purposefully incorrectly. It immediately negates anything you say in most people’s eyes. Because no one can take you seriously when you do that. Even if you’re trying to make a serious, salient point. No one will give a shit because of the way you’re spelling words just to annoy others. You have reduced the value that your thoughts hold because of this schtick.
I agree, it's annoying AF. It does detract from the substance of the argument too. This coming from someone who appreciates his posts and agrees with some of his points.

I won't ignore him regardless, but I just can't read the posts anymore.
 
Back
Top Bottom