-
Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).
Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
You Want to Get Content Then Put The Following Members on Your Panel
@Hoosier in Mad Town @Jayhox @entergo2 Just to Name a Few
And Many Others That Are Smart and Well Spoken
Edit - Not Saying The Current Cast Aren't Smart or Well Spoken But These 3 + @Godcamit Have Been Solving This Mystery Like Nancy Fucking Drew Since Day One of the Original Vegas Thread
Edit #2 @Jayhox Is Not Allowed to Digress Into KU Hoops
Ran across these car emblems & thought I'd share:
badgeslide.com
FJB EDITION Metal Emblem Fender Badge
Badgeslide #FJB Let's Go Brandon EDITION Sticker Car Metal Fender Badge Truck Side Rear Front Decal Christmas Gift
TTUcamper
Elite
Epstein was managing the money for multiple foundations attached to mega group members. It was billions and all public record until he got busted in 08. The bronfmans, Steven Spielberg, Leslie wexner, Michael Steinhardt all had Epstein on the board of there foundations managing the money. (he wasn't managing shit, he was just laundering sex trafficking cash and blackmail)
SoonerMD09
Elite
I fucking knew it
I Remember This From an Older Version
Heff Was a See Eye Aye Honey-Pot
Heff Was a See Eye Aye Honey-Pot
"What goes on in the grotto, gets filmed and used as blackmail against you"
Of course it’s not. The are giving the Pfizer-BioNtech until it runs out, and they probably have an infinite supply of it b/c it is under EUA. Not one American. citizen will receive the Comirnaty b/c by the time they would be ready to, it will be time for the next round of mRNA that now has Delta variant specific mRNA in it which will start all over as another EUA. What a wonderfully moral business model.
If they really gave a shit about people, the booster would be the Delta variant mRNA with their version of a study already done to show that it is safer than saline, 102% effective, treats male pattern baldness, and has anti-aging effects.
People will realize that it is ridiculous to give a 5 year old a vaccine for a viral infection that is as less dangerous than taking one trip in rush hour traffic. People will figure out that the adverse reaction rate is log rhythmically greater than reported and all the mandates will be struck down. But not before the rich, connected, and DC swamp have already cashed out their pharma and covid related investments at the best possible time, which is hopefully soon.
Does anyone know the story on who the new Mods like Genmod came to be?
Fails to account for why so many government agencies are exempted while no private organizations are. If the disease is so bad (it's not) there should be no exemptions for anyone.
Keep in mind, the USPS and its vendors/contractors (truck drivers) are exempted. Why? Postal employees interact with more people daily across the country than anyone else. Maybe they are the super-spreaders.
Last edited:
I'll take the job.Help Wanted - Marine Corps Looking to Hire a Diversity Commissar
LINK
A job listing with the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) seeking a “diversity, equity, and inclusion” adviser with a starting salary of $144,128 is gaining attention on social media.
USA Jobs
Salary $144,128 - $183,300 per year Actual salary may vary depending on the scope and the complexity of the qualifications and current compensation of the selectee.
4 words and I'm done. Thank you very much! "Treat Everyone The Same."
Lots of juicy stuff in the mandate rebuke:
We next consider the necessity of the Mandate. The Mandate is
staggeringly overbroad. Applying to 2 out of 3 private-sector employees in
America, in work places as diverse as the country itself, the Mandate fails to
consider what is perhaps the most salient fact of all: the ongoing threat of
COVID-19 is more dangerous to some employees than to other employees.All
else equal, a 28 year-old trucker spending the bulk of his workday in the
solitude of his cab is simply less vulnerable to COVID-19 than a 62 year-old
prison janitor. Likewise, a naturally immune unvaccinated worker is
presumably at less risk than an unvaccinated worker who has never had the
virus. The list goes on, but one constant remains—the Mandate fails almost
completely to address, or even respond to, much of this reality and common
sense.
At the same time, the Mandate is also underinclusive. The most
vulnerable worker in America draws no protection from the Mandate if his
company employs 99 workers or fewer. The reason why? Because, as even
OSHA admits, companies of 100 or more employers will be better able to
administer (and sustain) the Mandate. See 86 Fed. Reg. 61,402, 61,403
(“OSHA seeks information about the ability of employers with fewer than
100 employees to implement COVID-19 vaccination and/or testing
programs.”). That may be true. But this kind of thinking belies the premise
that any of this is truly an emergency. Indeed, underinclusiveness of this sort
is often regarded as a telltale sign that the government’s interest in enacting
a liberty-restraining pronouncement is not in fact “compelling.”
The underinclusive nature of the Mandate implies that the Mandate’s true purpose is not to
enhance workplace safety, but instead to ramp up vaccine uptake by any
means necessary.
9 The Mandate is also underinclusive in the solutions it proposes.Indeed,even in
its fullest force, the Mandate cannot prevent vaccinated employees from spreading the
virus in the workplace, or prevent unvaccinated employees from spreading the virus in
between weekly tests.
And...
It lastly bears noting that the Mandate raises serious constitutional
concerns that either make it more likely that the petitioners will succeed on
the merits, or at least counsel against adopting OSHA’s broad reading of
§ 655(c) as a matter of statutory interpretation.
First, the Mandate likely exceeds the federal government’s authority
under the Commerce Clause because it regulates noneconomic inactivity that
falls squarely within the States’ police power. A person’s choice to remain
unvaccinated and forgo regular testing is noneconomic inactivity.
We next consider the necessity of the Mandate. The Mandate is
staggeringly overbroad. Applying to 2 out of 3 private-sector employees in
America, in work places as diverse as the country itself, the Mandate fails to
consider what is perhaps the most salient fact of all: the ongoing threat of
COVID-19 is more dangerous to some employees than to other employees.All
else equal, a 28 year-old trucker spending the bulk of his workday in the
solitude of his cab is simply less vulnerable to COVID-19 than a 62 year-old
prison janitor. Likewise, a naturally immune unvaccinated worker is
presumably at less risk than an unvaccinated worker who has never had the
virus. The list goes on, but one constant remains—the Mandate fails almost
completely to address, or even respond to, much of this reality and common
sense.
At the same time, the Mandate is also underinclusive. The most
vulnerable worker in America draws no protection from the Mandate if his
company employs 99 workers or fewer. The reason why? Because, as even
OSHA admits, companies of 100 or more employers will be better able to
administer (and sustain) the Mandate. See 86 Fed. Reg. 61,402, 61,403
(“OSHA seeks information about the ability of employers with fewer than
100 employees to implement COVID-19 vaccination and/or testing
programs.”). That may be true. But this kind of thinking belies the premise
that any of this is truly an emergency. Indeed, underinclusiveness of this sort
is often regarded as a telltale sign that the government’s interest in enacting
a liberty-restraining pronouncement is not in fact “compelling.”
The underinclusive nature of the Mandate implies that the Mandate’s true purpose is not to
enhance workplace safety, but instead to ramp up vaccine uptake by any
means necessary.
9 The Mandate is also underinclusive in the solutions it proposes.Indeed,even in
its fullest force, the Mandate cannot prevent vaccinated employees from spreading the
virus in the workplace, or prevent unvaccinated employees from spreading the virus in
between weekly tests.
And...
It lastly bears noting that the Mandate raises serious constitutional
concerns that either make it more likely that the petitioners will succeed on
the merits, or at least counsel against adopting OSHA’s broad reading of
§ 655(c) as a matter of statutory interpretation.
First, the Mandate likely exceeds the federal government’s authority
under the Commerce Clause because it regulates noneconomic inactivity that
falls squarely within the States’ police power. A person’s choice to remain
unvaccinated and forgo regular testing is noneconomic inactivity.
Jtrain80
Legendary
Rock Chalk Jayhawk!!!
Best of luck against the fighting pole assassins from Austinfornia today.
That's up there with libs finding out the victims were caucasian, and it blew their minds.
Tucker Burst Out Laughing at What Edward Durr Told Stephen Sweeney, the NJ Senate President He Ousted
New Jersey Senate President Stephen Sweeney was ousted by Edward Durr, a little known Republican candidate who spent next to nothing on his campaign.For a bit, Sweeney held out hope that
townhall.com
This Is a Valid Self-Defense Case
Editor's Note: Today's episode of Kurt Schlichter's "Stream of Kurtiousness" is open to everyone! Normally, Kurt's exclusive video series is reserved for Townhall VIP members, but we wanted to give you
townhall.com
History Will Grind Out the Truth
"History will figure that out on its own." That is what Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) recently replied to Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
townhall.com
Kerry’s Call: Solar Panels Matter More Than Human Rights
The Biden administration faced a big question: Should it take a stand for human rights during the ongoing genocide of Uyghurs in western China? Or should it mute its criticism
townhall.com
Pay Attention to the Backyard Your Children Play In
To say that modern conservatism has failed egregiously in our school systems would be a monumental understatement. As a survivor of the Nebraska Public K-12 education system, I witnessed firsthand
townhall.com
Jtrain80
Legendary
Notice anything similar?
-"The public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions - even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials."
And....
Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
-"The public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions - even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials."
And....
Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
Tunnels to Warren Beaty, Jack Nicholson, Kirk Douglas and James Caan residences.
Can't see shit captain. Certainly not beyond a reasonable doubt.
