• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
AmericanViking said:
There are some leadership that shared it even though it was supposed to be embargoed info. They (VA) is not being upfront or communicating with its employees on this.
Click to expand...
I'm amazed at how few of the MDs and PAs I speak with know anything of Ivermectin and alternative treatments for Wuhan in their official positions. Individually, away from listening ears, many are as upset about this bullshit as we are.
 
I think this bitch is really directing AOC and the Squad. Notice I didn't say she was the Brain of the Squad.
www.breitbart.com

Jayapal: I Won’t Vote for a Bill with Hyde Amendment in It

Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that she would not vote for the Democrats reconciliation bill if it included the Hyde Amendment, which banned federal spending to go toward abortion. | Clips
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
Took my oldest son to LSU this weekend for the Auburn game. Lots of fun, wild place to watch a game, great win for the good Tigers.

Highlight of the night was leaving the stadium with about 100 Auburn students. I got to briefly relive my college days, oh and take part in a fuck Joe Biden chant. Felt good.
 
imprimis said:
I'm amazed at how few of the MDs and PAs I speak with know anything of Ivermectin and alternative treatments for Wuhan in their official positions. Individually, away from listening ears, many are as upset about this bullshit as we are.
Click to expand...

I have said for years. It’s not that doctors have bad intentions. They are taught in medical school using text books written by big pharma. So instead of curing you they throw a drug at a symptom. That drug then has side effects. So another drug is given for those side effects which also has side affects so another drug ………. And so forth. It’s a sick cycle carousel. Many of them blindly listen to the CDC or IHS and with reason. I’m not blaming any individuals. That said, they need to look up the facts on Remdesivir and Fauci murdering HIV patients with Bactrim (hope I got that med right). Any doc that does not give you a choice in your treatment should lose their license.

My best docs have been DO’s, then NPC’s, then MD’s, then PA’s, and frankly, there has been only two MD’s I’d ever recommend to anyone. The rest aren’t worth shit. Veterinarians have given better advice.
 
AmericanViking said:
I have said for years. It’s not that doctors have bad intentions. They are taught in medical school using text books written by big pharma. So instead of curing you they throw a drug at a symptom. That drug then has side effects. So another drug is given for those side effects which also has side affects so another drug ………. And so forth. It’s a sick cycle carousel. Many of them blindly listen to the CDC or IHS and with reason. I’m not blaming any individuals. That said, they need to look up the facts on Remdesivir and Fauci murdering HIV patients with Bactrim (hope I got that med right). Any doc that does not give you a choice in your treatment should lose their license.

My best docs have been DO’s, then NPC’s, then MD’s, then PA’s, and frankly, there has been only two MD’s I’d ever recommend to anyone. The rest aren’t worth shit. Veterinarians have given better advice.
Click to expand...
Jesus you couldn't be more wrong.
 
There is this on a duckduck search:

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Reinfection Rates Among Patients Who Previously Tested Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort Study - PubMed

Prior infection in patients with COVID-19 was highly protective against reinfection and symptomatic disease. This protection increased over time, suggesting that viral shedding or ongoing immune response may persist beyond 90 days and may not represent true reinfection. As vaccine supply is...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

“Of 150,325 patients, 8,845 (5.9%) tested positive and 141,480 (94.1%) tested negative prior to August 30. 1,278 (14.4%) of the positive patients were retested after 90 days, and 62 had possible reinfection. Of those, 31 (50%) were symptomatic. Of those with initial negative testing, 5,449 (3.9%) were subsequently positive and 3,191 of those (58.5%) were symptomatic. Protection offered from prior infection was 81.8% (95% confidence interval 76.6 to 85.8), and against symptomatic infection was 84.5% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 89.1). This protection increased over time.”
 
America 1st said:
There is this on a duckduck search:

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Reinfection Rates Among Patients Who Previously Tested Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort Study - PubMed

Prior infection in patients with COVID-19 was highly protective against reinfection and symptomatic disease. This protection increased over time, suggesting that viral shedding or ongoing immune response may persist beyond 90 days and may not represent true reinfection. As vaccine supply is...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

“Of 150,325 patients, 8,845 (5.9%) tested positive and 141,480 (94.1%) tested negative prior to August 30. 1,278 (14.4%) of the positive patients were retested after 90 days, and 62 had possible reinfection. Of those, 31 (50%) were symptomatic. Of those with initial negative testing, 5,449 (3.9%) were subsequently positive and 3,191 of those (58.5%) were symptomatic. Protection offered from prior infection was 81.8% (95% confidence interval 76.6 to 85.8), and against symptomatic infection was 84.5% (95% confidence interval 77.9 to 89.1). This protection increased over time.”
Click to expand...
I love duck. It renders correctly
 
America 1st said:
I’d sink their B3 plan after that shit on principle.

That’s fucking nuts! Especially to do to a female Senator.
Click to expand...
It is comical how dumb some are. Some humans want masters. The mRNA shot changes genomes in human beings. By changing you genome the cabal can claim you are no longer covered by the laws of genetics. Yall DNA is important mononucleides and shit
 
quote:
“But,” Fauci said, “you are a member of society and as a member of society, reaping all the benefits of being a member of society, you have a responsibility to society, and I think each of us, particularly in the context of a pandemic that’s killing millions of people, you have got to look at it and say there comes a time when you do have to give up what you consider your individual right of making your own decision for the greater good of society.”
Click to expand...




LINK
 

Similar threads

NotoriousOutlawRecords
TFSF & its true purpose
Replies
13
Views
431
NotoriousOutlawRecords
NotoriousOutlawRecords
Cartoondude135
YouTube TERMINATED my account for NO REASON!
Replies
34
Views
1K
Asshole
Asshole
Chris Farley
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Welcome to TMAC!
Replies
0
Views
2K
Chris Farley
Chris Farley
Cartoondude135
Help me acquire discontinued sound effect libraries please
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Rva
Rva
IAmDamagedGoods
Corrupt law enforcement agency!!! Legal advice/guidance needed!
2 3
Replies
113
Views
9K
Rebarcock.
Rebarcock.

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$620.00
Donate View

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom