• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Really great video on suppression of treatment. Hard evidence shared of the crookery going on behind the scenes. Search for it on banned.video one of the best I've seen so far on this topic 🔥💫
I've believed for some time that this is about getting rid of many segments of the population. Senior citizens are the top candidates since they are receiving lots of monetary benefits from what they have been promised and paid for throughout their working years. It's also about destroying their savings, businesses, stature in society among other nefarious reasons. But, the main thing is those who die (are killed) won't receive any more $$ once they are gone for medical care or social security.
 
So does Yoga.

Be careful messing with that stuff. It's real and it's powerful in ways most people have zero understanding.

Yoga But Yoga Pants Are Ok Right?

These Don't Look Like Evil Spirits

ce8a7eab5cb9842f45dd3d8154fecc66.jpg

ce6bcdf5ec33cc95f79bb94b2decfadb.jpg




At Least Not Tennis Yoga I Hope - Could Go Straight Sets With This One

71lMXF+pmWL._AC_UL1500_.jpg
 
I could use some help. With regard to election law, precedent, etc. I was under the impression that an election that couldn’t be proven to be legit is in fact not legit. In other words, the burden falls on those conducting it to show that the outcome is legitimate, as opposed to the burden falling on others to prove that it’s illegitimate. And if they can’t prove legitimacy then the outcome of the election is void.

I hope I’m making sense.

I saw this or something like it written out before, but unfortunately can’t find it anywhere. Am I right about this? If so, is there a link to some sort of law or statute explaining this?

Thank you!
 
Seems several State Supreme Courts are ruling that banning a mask mandate is unconstitutional. Clearly these fucking jackasses making this ruling have been compromised to the max. How the fuck is saying you CANNOT FORCE KIDS to wear a mask unconstitutional??
Believe you realize this, but SC Supreme Court ruled that our de facto mask ban (by preventing funds to be used to enforce masks) IS constitutional.

I am very grateful for this. I can't stand to see our kids muzzled.
 
I've believed for some time that this is about getting rid of many segments of the population. Senior citizens are the top candidates since they are receiving lots of monetary benefits from what they have been promised and paid for throughout their working years. It's also about destroying their savings, businesses, stature in society among other nefarious reasons. But, the main thing is those who die (are killed) won't receive any more $$ once they are gone for medical care or social security.
And They Vote MAGA
 
I could use some help. With regard to election law, precedent, etc. I was under the impression that an election that couldn’t be proven to be legit is in fact not legit. In other words, the burden falls on those conducting it to show that the outcome is legitimate, as opposed to the burden falling on others to prove that it’s illegitimate. And if they can’t prove legitimacy then the outcome of the election is void.

I hope I’m making sense.

I saw this or something like it written out before, but unfortunately can’t find it anywhere. Am I right about this? If so, is there a link to some sort of law or statute explaining this?

Thank you!
Well it was certified as legit. Now we try to decertify w proof of fraud.
Assuming I understand your question
 
Believe you realize this, but SC Supreme Court ruled that our de facto mask ban (by preventing funds to be used to enforce masks) IS constitutional.

I am very grateful for this. I can't stand to see our kids muzzled.
I'm confused....so the SC Supreme Court said banning funds to enforce masks is constitutional but banning the actual mask mandate is not constitutional?
 
My bro on the homoboard did a little work.

184M fully vaccinated in US (this definition keeps changing due to how many boosters they want)

as of 9/3 before the purge by CDC to get the numbers down:

14,701 deaths
14,747 life threatening reactions
793 prolonged hospital stay
19,034 permanent disability
52,072 Hospitalized
426 birth defects
37,503 ER/Office visits
146,276 negative reactions

If Harvard is right this translates to:

1.5m deaths
1.5m life threatening reactions
79k permanent disability
59k hospitalized
43k birth defects
3.8m Er/office visits
14.6m negative reactions

now let’s look at the rates:
0.8% die from the vax
0.8% experience life threatening reactions
0.04% experience prolonged hospitalization
1% experience permanent disability
3% are hospitalized
0.02% birth defects
2% ER/office visit
8% negative reactions

Well look there. You have a better chance of dying or having a permanent disability (depending on age) from the vax than from covid. You have a significantly better chance of a negative reaction than if you get COVID.

WHY ARE THEY WANTING TO MANDATE THIS FOR CHILDREN and young adults? (All caps was an accident)

Because it’s not about the vax and it never has been. Add in the 26% that actually died from Remdesivir and your chances without the vax get even better.

Fewer than 1% of adverse reactions are reported.

https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/defa...ion/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
 

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$620.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom