• Pat Flood (@rebarcock) passed away 9/21/25. Pat played a huge role in encouraging the devolopmemt of this site and donated the very first dollar to get it started. Check the thread at the top of the board for the obituary and please feel free to pay your respects there. I am going to get all the content from that thread over to his family so they can see how many people really cared for Pat outside of what they ever knew. Pat loved to tell stories and always wanted everyone else to tell stories. I think a great way we can honor Pat is to tell a story in his thread (also pinned at the top of the board).

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads
Yeah you think that’s bad. Florida State has reached a new low. I did not see this until late last night. I was shocked


Interesting take below

Lol no. Norvell is a loser but he’s organized. We need a guy to stop the bleeding and get us back to a place where we can be competitive in the acc. Then we need him to get hired away in 3 or 4 years (because we can’t afford to fire him) and hire somebody who isn’t a loser.
 
241890090_669620064431172_7965964903353640486_n.jpg
 
Flight Termination System...

When it comes to the remote control of civilian aircraft, President Bush stated in late September 2001 that he would devote federal funds to developing new technologies for combating the threat of hijacking…including remote control technology.

But even at that time, remote control technology had been successfully demonstrated for commercial jetliners for nearly two decades. There is actual footage of a joint NASA / FAA experiment conducted in 1984 at Edwards Air Force Base in which a Boeing 720 was remote controlled through multiple takeoffs and landings before being crashed in a “controlled impact demonstration.”

In August of 2001, this technology was further demonstrated by Raytheon, which successfully took off and landed a Boeing 727 six times at Holloman AFB in New Mexico without a pilot on board. Raytheon also developed a sensor suite for the Air Force’s Global Hawk drones and Raytheon Network Centric Systems has recently won multiple contracts to help develop advanced communications systems for the E-4B, the US government’s so-called doomsday plane that was spotted above the White House shortly before the strike on the Pentagon and which has since been confirmed was one of four functioning Doomsday Planes operating in the skies on that day.

So to answer the question.. "How were their cell phones working??" Each hijacked plane on 9-11 was controlled landed. They were on the ground.
 
Curiously, on 9/11 itself Raytheon employees with ties to the company’s electronic warfare division, including a man described as the company’s “dean of electronic warfare” and multiple senior engineers for electronic systems, were among the listed passengers on each of the three planes that hit their targets that day. Raytheon also had an office in WTC2 on the 91st floor, and despite the fact that there were only four survivors from the Twin Towers who were above the impact zone at the time of the plane hits, no Raytheon employees died in the office that day.
 
Another curious connection presents itself in Dov Zakheim, the comptroller of the Bush Pentagon and, until taking over his Pentagon role in 2001, CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of Sytstem Planning Corporation, which provides a so-called “Flight Termination System” for the US military that the company boasts provides “a fully redundant turnkey range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles.” As comptroller of the Pentagon, Zakheim was responsible for the trillions of dollars that could not be accounted for in the Pentagon’s books at the time of 9/11 and which prompted Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld to declare a “war on bureaucracy” on September 10, 2001.
 
Flight Termination System...

When it comes to the remote control of civilian aircraft, President Bush stated in late September 2001 that he would devote federal funds to developing new technologies for combating the threat of hijacking…including remote control technology.

But even at that time, remote control technology had been successfully demonstrated for commercial jetliners for nearly two decades. There is actual footage of a joint NASA / FAA experiment conducted in 1984 at Edwards Air Force Base in which a Boeing 720 was remote controlled through multiple takeoffs and landings before being crashed in a “controlled impact demonstration.”

In August of 2001, this technology was further demonstrated by Raytheon, which successfully took off and landed a Boeing 727 six times at Holloman AFB in New Mexico without a pilot on board. Raytheon also developed a sensor suite for the Air Force’s Global Hawk drones and Raytheon Network Centric Systems has recently won multiple contracts to help develop advanced communications systems for the E-4B, the US government’s so-called doomsday plane that was spotted above the White House shortly before the strike on the Pentagon and which has since been confirmed was one of four functioning Doomsday Planes operating in the skies on that day.

So to answer the question.. "How were their cell phones working??" Each hijacked plane on 9-11 was controlled landed. They were on the ground.
I believe the truth is likely more nefarious than that. It is more likely that each hijacked plane was remote control crashed into their targets. If that were the case, all the hijackers did was take out the pilots to prevent them from overriding the controls or reporting they were not in control of their planes.

And when one understands the relationship of the crooks in Washington with the Saudis over the last 40 years, is it any surprise that the takeover crews were largely Saudi nationals?
 
Last edited:
I believe the truth is likely more nefarious than that. It is more likely that each hijacked plane was remote control crashed into their targets. If that were the case, all the hijackers did was take out the pilots to prevent them from overriding the controls or reporting they were not in control of their planes.

And when one understands the relationship of the crooks in Washington with the Saudis over the last 40 years, is it any surprise that the takeover crews were largely Saudi nationals?
Once a plane is taken over remotely.. it can not be overridden. It loses its call sign and signal. How convenient..
 
fsu is short of smart, situational awareness football players. Its been like that for a good while now. I dont think the players are smart enough to understand what to do or not do in a given situation unless they are told right before that situation occurs (ie: timeout in critical times to be sure they know what to do). Anybody knows in the circumstance they put themselves in Sat nite- you tackle the WR before he catches it and take the PI penalty that ends the game or at the very least takes 4-5 seconds off the clock and leaves them with a 50 FG to TIE.


Jimbo would have used 10 timeouts a half if available because the boys just didn't get "it".
I think the players recruited are a major issue. I believe you have to have a majority of smart football players, then the balance can be the "4-5 star" athletes.
No way these coaches (JF, WT MN) are that obtuse.
just my opinion tho
At this point it seems apparent to me that willie is that dumb.
 
Lol no. Norvell is a loser but he’s organized. We need a guy to stop the bleeding and get us back to a place where we can be competitive in the acc. Then we need him to get hired away in 3 or 4 years (because we can’t afford to fire him) and hire somebody who isn’t a loser.
I love to talk about how shitty FSU is, and this is coming from an FSU fan. But let’s take this shit to the proper thread.

P.S. I’ve been guilty of this too itt.

 
It will take many years or even decades to accomplish a takeover via central American immigration. What they're doing is about now. The Great Reset is 2021-22 and they had to pull out all the stops just to get to this point.

In a sense, it's all a distraction from their ultimate goal, one world totalitarianism. But killing off a huge % of the population is and always been a big part of their plan.
I’m skeptical the vaccine is designed to kill people on a massive scale. Maybe it reduces fertility in 20% of people and causes an increase in some cancers. Both are things big pharmaceutical can continue to make money off of. A mass kill off event just makes no sense; people might actually fight back if their loved ones start getting killed off. From their point of view it’s better to take the frog in the boiling water approach.



But yea it’s likely enough that I’m not getting that jab and neither are my kids.
 

Donate 2025

Current cycle
$0.00
Total amount
$620.00

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom