-
In Memory of Rebarcock.
As we navigate life without Pat 'Rebarcock.' Flood, who passed on Sept 21, 2025, we continue to remember the profound impact he had on our community. His support was a cornerstone for our forum. We encourage you to visit the memorial thread to share your memories and condolences. In honor of Pat’s love for storytelling, please contribute to his ‘Rebarcock tells a story’ thread. Your stories will help keep his spirit alive among us.
Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
Can’t wait to hear about more egregious cheating and see nothing done about it.
the retarded half of the gen pop do already believe it, they just don’t care, or worse they agree with it.
Absolutely Hate the Bushes but that one had me LMAO
OPD77
Legendary
They're probably not gonna happen and a possible reason for Bongino giving them the finger and is walking.
Goldhedge
Legendary
Thought experiment:
1. If a hostile foreign entity - a transnational crime syndicate, if you will - got control of the US Federal Government decades ago, and turned all three branches of it into fronts for organized criminal activities directed at, targeting, and exploiting American citizens...
would such activity to supplant and replace the three constitutional branches of our federal government with fake af organized crime fronts be considered AN ACT OF WAR?
If you say yes, go on to point #2.
2. If the US Military decided to take concrete steps to free the US federal government from the iron-fisted control of this hostile foreign entity, where would they begin? Would they begin with the Legislative, the Judicial or the Executive Branch?
If you say 'They'd start with the branch with the direct control of the US military itself, as well as the key federal agencies.' go on to point #3.
3. Having scouted the three organized crime fronts masquerading as the constitutional three branches of the US government when they are not, what practical steps would be taken to effect a HOSTILE TAKEOVER of the Executive Branch? Would finding someone to run for President to help them expose it all and then prosecute it be a part of any such plan?
If you say "Yes, they'd have to find someone to run for President and help them expose it and then start a hostile takeover of the Executive Branch." go on to point #4.
4. When this proposed hostile takeover of the Executive Branch, and it's law enforcement and intelligence agencies and the entire US Military **reached a sufficient level of control**, what would the next logical step be in the mission to reconstitute a real constitutional federal government?
If you say, "The next logical step would be reveal to the country that the organized crime fronts that have been masquerading as the Legislative and Judicial branches of the government are by their organized crime front nature ILLEGTIMATE and they must be deposed." go on to point #5.
5. If the organized crime fronts pretending to be the US Congress and the federal judiciary are still controlled by this hostile foreign entity and assisting it in undermining, sabotaging, exploiting and stealing from the United States and her citizens, should the organized crime front people in the US Congress and the federal judiciary be tried in the civilian federal court system?
If you say, "No, that proposition is absurd on its face, to hold trials for organized crime agents who were operating an unconstitutional organized crime front in a fake US Congress and a fake Federal Judiciary inside the federal civilian court system they themselves controlled and corrupted." go on to point #6.
6. If people were knowingly helping to run false fronts for organized crime masquerading as the US government on behalf of a transnational crime syndicate, and they were in fact helping, aiding and assisting that hostile foreign entity in it's efforts to make war by surreptitious means on the United States and her citizens, can they legally be subjected to military tribunals?
If you say, "Yes, these people could not be tried in the federal civilian court system, and their treasonous conduct in helping to make war on their own country in exchane for massive bribes would justify military tribunals." go on to point #7.
7. You now understand everything I understood 3 years ago in early 2022 when I read the Q drops.
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
OPD77
Legendary
John Judas McCain...glad he's gone.
The Super Bowl is more than a game — it’s a national moment.
It should unite, not divide. It should honor tradition, not chase trends.
When the halftime show becomes more about controversy than country, we all lose.
We don’t need virtue signals — we need value.
Let the Super Bowl be what it once was — for the fans, by the fans, and about America.
Kolby Kyle
For almost 30 years, a Clinton era DOJ trick quietly gutted welfare reform. Congress said immigrants should be self sufficient, sponsors should be financially responsible, and taxpayers should not be the backup plan. Sounds reasonable, right?
Well, the Clinton DOJ pulled a classic Washington sleight of hand. They said, “Oh, the wording is ambiguous,” and magically turned a hard law into a polite suggestion. That loophole let benefits flow where Congress explicitly said they shouldn’t. And for three decades, nobody in power seemed too bothered by it.
Until now.
The Trump DOJ just did something radical in modern America:
They enforced the law as it was written.
No reimagining.
No feelings based interpretation.
No bureaucratic gymnastics.
This reversal restores waiting periods, forces sponsors to actually be sponsors, and closes loopholes that turned American taxpayers into an unlimited credit card for bad policy. If you sign your name saying you’ll support someone, guess what? You actually have to support them. What a concept.
And before the outrage machine spins up, let’s be honest about what this is not.
This is not anti immigrant.
This is not cruel.
This is not heartless.
This is accountability.
America is not a welfare destination. It’s a nation with laws. Laws that were ignored because politicians were too cowardly to enforce them and too addicted to virtue signaling to admit the damage.
Critics will scream about “vulnerable populations,” but they never seem worried about the American families footing the bill, the working class getting squeezed, or the fact that ignoring laws encourages chaos. Compassion without boundaries isn’t compassion. It’s negligence.
For the first time in decades, the DOJ just told the bureaucracy:
“You don’t get to rewrite Congress.”
That’s not radical.
That’s how a country is supposed to function.
Funny how enforcing the law suddenly feels revolutionary.
Traci Coston
This is horrific and evil. Reports say that Dipu Chandra Das, a Hindu factory worker, was brutally lynched in Bangladesh’s Mymensingh district after being accused of making derogatory remarks about the Prophet Muhammad. According to multiple reports, an Islamist mob attacked him, beating him until he lost consciousness. After he was k1lled, his body was tied to a tree and set on fire in public view.
This should be talked about on every news station in America because if we don’t do something soon, this is the mentality is attempting to force itself into our culture.
They should cross reference with their poop map, third world
Last edited:
People have no idea how much Klaus Schwab's summit in 2020 changed all stock trading. WEF published a whitepaper that regulated ESG according to a zillion rules, and many public companies immediately signed on at the cost of losing government contracts or institutional contracts.
That's why all companies sound the same nowadays and that's why they all pour money into leftist groups. It's mandated by the ESG guidelines that WEF published in 2020.
Similar threads
