European women are massively supporting the Islamization of Europe, turning themselves into Islamic slaves, and craving to be killed and raped.
Eurobarometer and European Social Survey results between 2016 and 2020 confirm that women are systematically more favorable to immigration than men.
Men are more skeptical of immigration’s economic and cultural effects, while women lean toward acceptance. The difference is not marginal, it is measurable in nearly every country surveyed.
In the United States, the Pew Research Center found in 2018 and 2020 that women were significantly more likely than men to support granting legal status to undocumented immigrants. They were also more likely to oppose restrictive border measures. In national elections, the divide translates directly into voting behavior: in both 2016 and 2020, U.S. women leaned more toward the Democratic Party, which has tied itself to pro-immigration platforms, while men were more represented among Republican voters pushing for restriction.
This distinction becomes sharper when broken down by demographics. Younger, urban, and higher-educated women are the strongest supporters of asylum rights, refugee resettlement, and extension of social programs to immigrant populations. Men, by contrast, dominate support for border fortification and reduced immigration quotas. Even among older or rural women, where attitudes narrow the gap, the difference remains statistically significant.
The pattern is consistent: across continents, across political systems, and across multiple years of surveys, women place themselves more on the side of immigrationist policies. The gender gap on immigration is not anecdotal; it is structural.
And we allow them to vote
