Here is Why Herschel Has to Run
These Ex-Athletes Have Cred and Show That Conservatives Actually Have Better Policies for Minorities
Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens
- Thread starter Bryan74b
- Start date
Master Threads
Here is Why Herschel Has to Run
These Ex-Athletes Have Cred and Show That Conservatives Actually Have Better Policies for Minorities
The military is lost.
Dems have a history of fkn things up.
Don’t know why I’m more pessimistic now.
it seems obvious it was over when Bush 41 was elected.
good night.
it seems obvious it was over when Bush 41 was elected.
good night.
Catholic Priest Goes OFF on Biden - Wow!
Fmoshermw
Elite
This all needs to just stop. Helps no one. Is misrepresented by both sides.
I am fully aware of the implications - my gut feel is it's just the military standing up for their own - chic or not.
Military chix I work around daily are not liabilities - quite the opposite.
They also hate this.
Let's just get on with the mission.
Hopefully, his troops shoot him in the back.
Last edited:
Tigers19
Poster
It has nothing to do with women, in general. It was about the military making a maternity jumpsuit. All Carlson said was that no pregnant woman should be in a combat situation and the higher ups in military lost their fucking mind. Then, they went on to attack Carlson through official military twitter profiles. That, is a dangerous precedent to allow.
Fmoshermw
Elite
Copy.
Am as 'guilty' as the higher ups in making it more about military ladies I work with every day (none of whom are pregnant nor would they ever put their unborn at risk if so) rather than what you've said here - which is 100% accurate.
Easy to lose sight of the real message when defending teammates.
I'm not impressed that he went off on Biden (though he did). I'm impressed that he spoke with such clear power and authority.
When Your Morning Coffee Time on the Balcony is So Pleasant You Don't Want to Waste Any Time Going Inside to Piss
Then maybe the men should stop commenting for the women. Especially since they are purposely misrepresenting what Tucker Carlson said. At no time did he say women should not serve in the military. We're perfectly capable of speaking for ourselves or choosing not to. IF the focus of the administration is to better pregnancy conditions for women in service, maybe we can start with gynecological/obstetrical care. Hairstyle updates, etc isn't that big a deal in the grand scheme of things and, frankly, gets eye rolls from the women I know who are currently serving and those who did.
The point that the official Twitter account is being used to target a specific media personality based on the current administration's ideology is dangerous and flat out wrong. There's no both sides to that. Let one of these windbags push back against the administration's stance and let's see what happens.
Can't think of anything I'd rather do while pregnant than active combat.
Though, now that I think back.... there were days I could have easily leveled the world single handedly. 
Unity Baby
townhall.com
townhall.com
Biden Asks For EEOC Attorney's Resignation. She Refused. Here's What Happened Next.
President Biden fired Equal Employment Opportunity Commission general counsel Sharon Fast Gustafson on Friday after she declined to resign under pressure from the White House. “At the time I was nominated,
townhall.com
How Many Times Must We Tell You to Never Apologize to These Scumbags?
That Mumford & Sons banjo guy is a pathetic weenie who the left hates and who we despise, and who now has to live forever as a groveling coward nobody likes. Yeah, he was in Mumford & Sons and managed to find a way to make people like him less. What did he do? He gave in. He submitted. He begged...
townhall.com
The genesis of our little band of conspiracists, and we had this almost from the jump. Good to be back home
I prefer to water the flowers from altitude.When Your Morning Coffee Time on the Balcony is So Pleasant You Don't Want to Waste Any Time Going Inside to Piss
I'll say it. Don't care how many competent women some of you know. Women absolutely should not be in combat roles. When women are required to register with selective service, then you'd maybe start to have an argument. When women have the exact same physical requirements to be a marine that men do, then a reasonable discussion could at least begin.
Just like with becoming a fireman. 99%+ females cannot carry a man down a ladder, yet check the roster of many fire dept's and you'll see size 2 wearing girls who might be able to carry a decent sized shopping bag down a ladder, because courts have ruled that any test that disproportionately excludes females is invalid.
Put a good man in a life and death situation with a woman, and he's not just thinking about doing his job, he's thinking about protecting that woman. Put an attractive woman in the mix, and an entirely new layer of variables enters the fray. Letting our military become a social experiment is a national disaster we will dearly pay for one day.
Just like with becoming a fireman. 99%+ females cannot carry a man down a ladder, yet check the roster of many fire dept's and you'll see size 2 wearing girls who might be able to carry a decent sized shopping bag down a ladder, because courts have ruled that any test that disproportionately excludes females is invalid.
Put a good man in a life and death situation with a woman, and he's not just thinking about doing his job, he's thinking about protecting that woman. Put an attractive woman in the mix, and an entirely new layer of variables enters the fray. Letting our military become a social experiment is a national disaster we will dearly pay for one day.
Some of those trannies may want to think twice. Back alley gender reassignment surgery by amateurs is coming if they push too hard.
Go up to a black member of Congress and call them the N-word and see how long you remain unarrested. Yet, those same words are hurled at policemen (we saw numerous example this past summer) with impunity. Free speech isn't free or equitable. If you can't yell that at a Congressman you shouldn't be able to yell it at a policeman.
And when the police arrive at a scene they are usually the least informed about the situation yet are asked to make life and death decisions based on limited and many times unreliable information.
SOTrojan
Poster
The military cannot take political sides. But under the Biden Admin, they are doing so. This is not a minor issue.
Jtrain80
Legendary
The whole rest of the government does, why should they get left out?
Fmoshermw
Elite
Our OG thread got pretty close if not all the way to here. No wonder it's forever gone.
Fmoshermw
Elite
Hard to argue with any of that. Nicely stated. Especially the part about attractiveness.
The ones I know are pilots. Good friends and pilots first, but unmistakably beautiful women a close second.
Will ponder that thought a bit.
dirtytoeddawg
Legendary
Gen Milley did under Trump. He came out with statements trying to say the military had no place in being a part of a political statement while at the same time making political statements. I was not impressed.
Das my home. Nigwa was chilling.
I've never yelled any name at anybody in my life, and I think it's shameful when people do that. Nevertheless, there is only one class of citizen in this country. There's not a First Amendment and a Firstest Amendment that apply more or less in favor depending on the recipient of the speech.
As to your specific example, let's back off the N-word ledge there. Is it legal to insult a member of Congress to their face? To my knowledge, yes. Should it be? If it's legal for us to insult one another, which it is, then it should be legal to do the same to them. They = us; there is no single degree of difference.
Morally or ethically, does insulting a member of Congress reflect poorly on the insulter? Depending on the context, probably. The example you used always ought to reflect very poorly on the name-caller. Heck, the insults we (myself included) throw around on this board are often in very poor form and something that reflects worse on us than on our intended target of ridicule.
Now, back to the police - I have no interest whatsoever in criminalizing free speech. That is the final slippery slope down which the Left already has us sliding. People assembling to protest and not participating in any unlawful activity ought to be able to do so and exercise their free speech.
We may just continue to disagree about this, which is fine. I just have a strong dislike for making carve-outs from our freedoms which are codified in the Constitution. It sets precedent for the next government and the one after that, which is that carving out exceptions and limiting freedom, even bit by bit, is OK. Government rarely, if ever, surrenders its own power, cuts its own intrusions into people's lives, or enhances freedom once in power. Limiting our freedom now only leads to continued and increased limits of freedom later.
This proposed law in Kentucky may work out for them; however, I fear it sets the stage for the next limitation, and the next one.
Not all speech is free now. One cannot yell Fire in a movie theater. There are some times speech is limited. As we saw all last summer, one person gets into the face of a policeman and starts going off. Without a response, others join in. Then it becomes poking, pushing and then throwing objects and even shots being fired and these were deemed "peaceful protests". Anarchy is the result which we all saw.
Last edited:
Similar threads
