Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Master Thread Dance Your Cares Away/Fraggle/Law Abiding Citizens

Master Threads

Cletusnow

Made the run from Texarkana to Atlanta
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
3,651
How old were you guys when you learned the modern “peer review” process was money-grab created by Pergamon Publishing in the 1960’s. That has led to the corruption of the scientific community and the self-affirming social sciences.


Pergamon was owned by Robert Maxwell.

Robert Maxwell is Ghislaine Maxwell’s father.

Probably around 19, 2nd year of college.
 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
22,663


^^why does Oakland even exist^^

 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
22,663



^^Happy 4th ^^
 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
22,663



 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
22,663


BIDEN: “I'll beat Donald Trump. I will beat him again in 2020


 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
22,663



 

Sgfeer

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
22,663


^^Biden's border^^
 

Long Cat V2.0

Legendary
Joined
May 20, 2021
Messages
2,262



 

imprimis

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
10,763



I'm guessing many of those who climb Everest are in the environmentalists or Save the Planet movement. Leaving their trash and bodies on the mountain tells a different story. Do what we say not what we do.
 

22*43*51

Boob Enthusiast
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
20,286


Courts all over are ruling against the COVID-19 Mandates - here's the latest roundup you might have missed:
(1) The Eighth Circuit ruled that lower courts cannot act as God when determining a person's religious beliefs. They must accept their beliefs as true. (Ringhoffer v. Mayo Clinic, Ambulance) Mayo Clinic will now face trial.

(2) The Ninth Circuit held that lower courts could not allow secular groups to be treated more favorably than religious groups. The court should have recognized that allowing firefighters from a different city under an exemption to fill in for firefighters the defendants fired for not taking the vaccine for religious reasons was a violation of those firefighters' religious rights. (Bacon v. Woodward)

(3) The Tenth Circuit held that it is unconstitutional for a government to grant religious accommodations for some but not others because the government must accept as true each person's religious beliefs, and the discretionary application of exemptions was applied unconstitutionally. (Does 1-11 v. Bd. of Regents)

(4) The Sixth Circuit BLASTED the lower court that called a person's religious beliefs personal and not religious. The court held nothing back when taking the lower court to the woodshed. (Lucky v. Landmark Med. Of Michigan)

(5) The Ninth Circuit held that if the Plaintiffs allegations are true that the drugs do not prevent the spread of the Coronavirus, then the drug is not a vaccine, only medical treatment, which implicates a fundamental right under the 14th Amendment to refuse unwanted medical treatment. The court remanded back to the lower court for further development. (Health Freedom v. LAUSD)

(6) The Federal Court denied the U.S. Government dismissing a case brought by military members, stating that if the drugs were under EUA, then that fact implicates a cause of action by military members and ordered an evidentiary hearing.

(7) There is a class action lawsuit going forward against the University of California Board of Regents over violations of a person's medical liberty rights.

(8) There is a billion-dollar class action granted a green light by the federal court against United Airlines relating to the COVID-19 mandates.

(9) Healthcare workers fired from their unlawful mandates are suing Governors Newsom (CA), Brown (OR), and Inslee (WA). These are § 1983 constitutional violation causes of action.

(10) There are lawsuits against the Texas HHS Commissioner Cecile Erwin Young, CO Board of Health and its Director, Oregon's Health Director, and California's Health Director. These are § 1983 constitutional violation causes of action.

(11) There are lawsuits against Houston Methodist (TX); Shriners Hospitals for Children in OR, WA, TX; UC Health in Colorado; South Denver Cardiologists Associates, Kaiser Impernente in CA, WA, OR; and from what I'm told there will be more lawsuits filed within the next 90-days against other hospitals. These lawsuits are over the hospital violating its government contracts and plaintiffs' 14th Amendment rights since they were acting under color of law.

(12) I'm told there are incoming lawsuits to be filed against CT, Biden, TX, CA, AZ, and PA over current mandates involving PREP Act or EUA products. These are declaratory judgment actions only seeking injunctions from the mandates.

(13) I'm preparing a video exposing the lawfare raging within the federal judiciary against Americans' rights to refuse investigational medical treatment. I think the Supreme Court would be aghast by the actions of its district and appellate judges.
 

AmericanViking

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
9,166


^^why does Oakland even exist^^



Wow, kids mother turned him in. I can’t imagine how hard it probably is on her emotionally. Respect
 

imprimis

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
10,763


BIDEN: “I'll beat Donald Trump. I will beat him again in 2020


Kamela would greet every visitor to the Oral Office on her knees.



Courts all over are ruling against the COVID-19 Mandates - here's the latest roundup you might have missed:
(1) The Eighth Circuit ruled that lower courts cannot act as God when determining a person's religious beliefs. They must accept their beliefs as true. (Ringhoffer v. Mayo Clinic, Ambulance) Mayo Clinic will now face trial.

(2) The Ninth Circuit held that lower courts could not allow secular groups to be treated more favorably than religious groups. The court should have recognized that allowing firefighters from a different city under an exemption to fill in for firefighters the defendants fired for not taking the vaccine for religious reasons was a violation of those firefighters' religious rights. (Bacon v. Woodward)

(3) The Tenth Circuit held that it is unconstitutional for a government to grant religious accommodations for some but not others because the government must accept as true each person's religious beliefs, and the discretionary application of exemptions was applied unconstitutionally. (Does 1-11 v. Bd. of Regents)

(4) The Sixth Circuit BLASTED the lower court that called a person's religious beliefs personal and not religious. The court held nothing back when taking the lower court to the woodshed. (Lucky v. Landmark Med. Of Michigan)

(5) The Ninth Circuit held that if the Plaintiffs allegations are true that the drugs do not prevent the spread of the Coronavirus, then the drug is not a vaccine, only medical treatment, which implicates a fundamental right under the 14th Amendment to refuse unwanted medical treatment. The court remanded back to the lower court for further development. (Health Freedom v. LAUSD)

(6) The Federal Court denied the U.S. Government dismissing a case brought by military members, stating that if the drugs were under EUA, then that fact implicates a cause of action by military members and ordered an evidentiary hearing.

(7) There is a class action lawsuit going forward against the University of California Board of Regents over violations of a person's medical liberty rights.

(8) There is a billion-dollar class action granted a green light by the federal court against United Airlines relating to the COVID-19 mandates.

(9) Healthcare workers fired from their unlawful mandates are suing Governors Newsom (CA), Brown (OR), and Inslee (WA). These are § 1983 constitutional violation causes of action.

(10) There are lawsuits against the Texas HHS Commissioner Cecile Erwin Young, CO Board of Health and its Director, Oregon's Health Director, and California's Health Director. These are § 1983 constitutional violation causes of action.

(11) There are lawsuits against Houston Methodist (TX); Shriners Hospitals for Children in OR, WA, TX; UC Health in Colorado; South Denver Cardiologists Associates, Kaiser Impernente in CA, WA, OR; and from what I'm told there will be more lawsuits filed within the next 90-days against other hospitals. These lawsuits are over the hospital violating its government contracts and plaintiffs' 14th Amendment rights since they were acting under color of law.

(12) I'm told there are incoming lawsuits to be filed against CT, Biden, TX, CA, AZ, and PA over current mandates involving PREP Act or EUA products. These are declaratory judgment actions only seeking injunctions from the mandates.

(13) I'm preparing a video exposing the lawfare raging within the federal judiciary against Americans' rights to refuse investigational medical treatment. I think the Supreme Court would be aghast by the actions of its district and appellate judges.

These cases brought because of edicts by business and government should have been in trial and resolved 3 years ago and not after billions were forced to take the jab.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom