Discuss...
Are you pro or anti 2nd amendment and why?
- Thread starter Chris Farley
- Start date
Are you lost?
Definitely pro. In fact I think we have too many restrictions now. As much as I don’t want it to happen, I feel there will come a time in my lifetime where I’ll have to use my 2nd Amendment right in order to keep it. Or in the coming civil war, whichever comes first. Again, I don’t want to see either of those, but I’m afraid we’ve headed down a path where it’s inevitable.
Perhaps, but why are you for it?
I’m for it because I’m not as accurate with throwing knives.
Why? Because fuck you that’s why.
Just kidding.
I support it because I feel that our elected officials should have it in the back of their mind that if they push too far then the proverbial shit will eventually hit the fan and I’d much rather retain my right to be armed than the alternative.
Also FBI, NSA, etc. who are reading this, I’m not advocating violence, unless you plan on infringing on my 2nd Amendment right.
Nas
Poster
Support it because I believe it keeps the monsters at bay. I don't think we would ever have military coming around to collect guns as the military is comprised of civilians. I have recently began to question how much more they could accomplish going that route with the social media brain rotting.
If there was ever a true attempt to disarm us they would ban ammunition and supplies used to make it. You would eventually run out like Obama intended after Sandy Hook.
it's coming at some point and it will happen.
I'm very pro 2A. I don't believe citizens should have the same fire power the military has, like it was originally intended. Off the dumb fucks in my crew acquired a 240B or a Javelin there is 0 chance it is not wasted on making the biggest explosion possible
If there was ever a true attempt to disarm us they would ban ammunition and supplies used to make it. You would eventually run out like Obama intended after Sandy Hook.
it's coming at some point and it will happen.
I'm very pro 2A. I don't believe citizens should have the same fire power the military has, like it was originally intended. Off the dumb fucks in my crew acquired a 240B or a Javelin there is 0 chance it is not wasted on making the biggest explosion possible
Anti 2A.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Fixed under a new amendment (28A):
Being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of all the people is to keep and bear Arms. This shall not be infringed or taxed.
Fixed under a new amendment (28A):
Being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of all the people is to keep and bear Arms. This shall not be infringed or taxed.
Interesting take and I 100% agree.
The time you need the 2A is when they try to take it from you.
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” -OG Jefferson
The 2A and your suggestion say the same thing. Unfortunately 250 years of liberal judges and gradually changing language have made the original text mean something very different to many Americans today.
Pro for reasons already stated about the government. Also, if you look at the vast majority of gun violence crimes they take place in areas that are already anti gun zones. Criminals will get guns no matter what. Used to argue with my mom all the time. She would say we need to make guns illegal and that will stop the shootings. I would always come back with " mom, we made murder illegal and these people are willing to do that, but you think a 5 year charge for having a gun is gonna stop them?"
Npklee
Elite
The argument made by the left of hurrr durrrr the military has nukes and all this weaponry so good luck with your guns is a total moron.
We haven’t actually won a war in 75 years. Why? They were all guerrilla warfare without use of nukes. And if america ain’t dropping nukes on bin laden they aren’t on Americans.
We haven’t actually won a war in 75 years. Why? They were all guerrilla warfare without use of nukes. And if america ain’t dropping nukes on bin laden they aren’t on Americans.
Yeah, people making that argument instantly show their complete ignorance of basic history. Vietnam, Iraq & Afghanistan say hello, to name just a few. Plus, those wars were against foreign enemies. There'd be alot of hesitation and desertion if our government turned the military loose on its fellow countrymen.
Please don’t tempt them.
