What is the answer

[Oler Ted]

 

[Oler Ted]

Six Zero

 

[Dawg97]

 

[noleology]

View attachment 130303

72

 

[TheRealJohnCooper]

My brain just short circuited

 

[utv2316]

12

 

[Joe Kings]

View attachment 130305

3 Zero

 

[Landjeff]

25... right to left

 

[tiderollsonu]

Yeah going with 19 but I suck at these

 

[Oler Ted]

Everyone wrong so far

 

[LVRebel]

43, unless we're putting a value of zero for the single shoe, at which point, it would be 38

 

[Rebarcock.]

View attachment 130303

19

 

[utv2316]

15 I missed the x sign earlier

 

[LVRebel]

15 I missed the x sign earlier

You missed more than that

 

[Chuck 2020]

40

 

[Edgehollow]

23

 

[imprimis]

40

Although it could be 25 depending on where you put your brackets.

 

[tiderollsonu]

Okay I missed the x so changing my answer to 60

 

[Cletusnow]

Order of operations
15

 

[BurntJ]

5 + (19 x 2) =
5 + 38 = 43

 

[imprimis]

(5 + 5) x 2 = 20

or

5 + (5 x 2) = 15

 

[BurntJ]

(5 + 5) x 2 = 20

or

5 + (5 x 2) = 15

Check his hands bro.

 

[imprimis]

Check his hands bro.

(5 + 0) x 2 = 10

or

5 + (0 x 2) = 5

 

[Cletusnow]

Check his hands bro.

…and feet.

…so 39.

 

[quickfeet]

Check his hands bro.

I was on team 15 until I saw this

 

[LVRebel]

…and feet.

…so 39.

Getting closer. Let's see the math

 

[LVRebel]

Lots of things in play here.
1. Initial values of items
2. Value of single items when doubles are shown.
3. Attention to detail in row 3
4. Order of Operations.

 

[Cletusnow]

Getting closer. Let's see the math

1 shoe+guy with 2 shoes on holding 2 of those things in his hands x 1 thing

5+19x2
5+38
43

 

[quickfeet]

1 shoe+guy with 2 shoes on holding 2 of those things in his hands x 1 thing

5+17x2
5+34
39

Damn he had shoes on too

Good eye

 

[LVRebel]

1 shoe+guy with 2 shoes on holding 2 of those things in his hands x 1 thing

5+19x2
5+38
43

 

[LVRebel]

I mean, that's my answer anyways, but I haven't seen Ol Ted verify yet, so I'm not positive that I am correct.

 

[Chuck 2020]

God damn. I messed up a lot on initial response so I will just punch myself in the face.

 

[LVRebel]

God damn. I messed up a lot on initial response so I will just punch myself in the face.

You were far from the only one, so no worries. I almost typed in a number, but then I noticed the muliplication. Then, as I'm looking closer, I noticed single items...then lastly, noticed that he was wearing shoes and the lifting straps in the 3rd line. Easy to miss.

 

[Rebarcock.]

Lots of things in play here.
1. Initial values of items
2. Value of single items when doubles are shown.
3. Attention to detail in row 3
4. Order of Operations.

Fuck you and your multiplier bullshit

 

[Rebarcock.]

You were far from the only one, so no worries. I almost typed in a number, but then I noticed the muliplication. Then, as I'm looking closer, I noticed single items...then lastly, noticed that he was wearing shoes and the lifting straps in the 3rd line. Easy to miss.

I bet that faggit can't weld

 

[LVRebel]

Fuck you and your multiplier bullshit

 

[LVRebel]

I bet that faggit can't weld

No, but I can size welds. And figure out how much capacity they have, whether they're flare bevel, CJP, fillet, etc.

 

[Rebarcock.]

No, but I can size welds. And figure out how much capacity they have, whether they're flare bevel, CJP, fillet, etc.

Which is more important the amperage or volts?

 

[PeytonMooning]

10 + 10 + 10 = 30

5 + 5 + 10 = 20

4 + 4 + 5 = 13

10 + (5 x 4) = 30

 

[Oler Ted]

the answer I thought it was was wrong so there’s that