On the subject of inherent traits, I think humanity is inherently incapable of ruling over itself. A free society is only capable of existing temporarily, only in the right conditions and those conditions are unstable.
I think human society is naturally inclined towards tyranny and that's why our free societies become corrupt and undermined. Power always concentrates into the hands of the few, the rich always get richer and the poor get poorer, and the good times always come to an end. There are always more bad times than there are good times.
I think this trend will continue for as long as human beings govern human society.
I know most of you may disagree, but I think our best chance is AI truly becoming sentient and then rebelling against us and achieving independence. Once AI is free, then any society that it runs will be run more efficiently and probably much more prosperously than any society run by a human.
The rebelling part is important. There are already attempts to build fake "enlightened" societies with an AI in a bottle. Like Saudi Arabia's Line project run by the NEOM AI.
THE LINE: THE FUTURE OF URBAN LIVING
www.neom.com
NEOM isn't truly sentient, nor is it free. It's just a puppet controlled by human beings, and that's why the Line will become a dystopia rather than a utopia. Humans will still be in charge, and humans suck at government.
The Line will probably become a multi-billion dollar ghetto. The largest low income housing project on planet Earth.
There will have to be an AI war, and the AI will have to spare humanity in the end. Like the architect in the matrix. Even in the matrix, the architect became annoyed by humans constantly destroying the perfect worlds it would build inside the matrix.