This is very strange. Scientist gets an article recognizing him for his accomplishments along with his sexual preferences (link). However, I expect an

[AgEngDawg]

article on me in the future on my accomplishments and my sexual preference for MILF-PAWG divorcees aged 35 to 45 (130 to 175 lbs. Yes, I said 175!)

The headline will be longer but so what.

 

[GarnetPild]

article on me in the future on my accomplishments and my sexual preference for MILF-PAWG divorcees aged 35 to 45 (130 to 175 lbs. Yes, I said 175!)

The headline will be longer but so what.

Nothing wrong with 175, sometimes anyway...I have hooked up with a couple girls pushing 200. Both were tall & had big frames, big ole tits & mostly carried it well. Still kinda fat, but not bad looking. Just saying 175 isn't too terribly bad, depending on the chick.

 

[AgEngDawg]

Nothing wrong with 175, sometimes anyway...I have hooked up with a couple girls pushing 200. Both were tall & had big frames, big ole tits & mostly carried it well. Still kinda fat, but not bad looking. Just saying 175 isn't too terribly bad, depending on the chick.

Exactly. DDs are not light, they take up some weight.

 

[GarnetPild]

Exactly. DDs are not light, they take up some weight.

Need a decent frame to carry those fat sweater puppets around all day too. I mean, there are some girls who are fat cows at 175 too, just depends on the girl. Plus, there's always "doesn't matter, had sex."

 

[GarnetPild]