Teacher caught bangin 17yr old student

[Jtrain80]

There was no Pizzagate - get over it.

It was deboonked! Lmao.

 

[TheResister]

As if other generations didn’t have children out of wedlock and multiple marriages.

Our society has trended away from socialism for over 75 years. Our society and government still live in the shadow of Ronald Reagan and it’s why we have one of the most right leaning societies on the planet.

The tax base is much expanded from any point in history so not sure what you’re implying with that? All these tax breaks without budget cuts over the last 50 years have the republicans and Keynesians happy.

You act like there haven’t always been a gays and that they don’t have an equal right to marriage as any other citizen under the 14th amendment. Furthermore, marriage is a government construct so in the interest of maximum liberty for all Americans there is absolutely no reason to oppose it.

Lastly, the country needs about 2.5 million’s immigrants a year over the next 100 years for population, economic, and military purposes. That’s just an objective fact. Let’s reform immigration in this country so that we can get the best (European & Mexican) people we can out of that 2.5 million.

"Since 1970, out-of-wedlock birth rates have soared. In 1965, 24 percent of black infants and 3.1 percent of white infants were born to single mothers. By 1990 the rates had risen to 64 percent for black infants, 18 percent for whites. Every year about one million more children are born into fatherless families."

An analysis of out-of-wedlock births in the United States | Brookings

George Akerlof and Janet Yellen look at the decline in shotgun marriages and rise in the births out of wedlock.

www.brookings.edu

Those who understand socialism disagree with your assessment:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/magazine/2020/01/21/i-was-60s-socialist-todays-progressives-are-danger-repeating-my-generations-mistakes/

Let's talk about marriage:

Either you believe that America is a Democracy OR you believe that the Constitution guarantees us a Republican Form of Government. Either way whether the government issues a marriage license and that is a privilege, NOT a Right. Presupposing that America is a Democracy, then when a majority of the people are against gay marriage, then IF you respect the will of the people, you abide by the will of the majority.

Of course, that isn't feasible, so people rely on the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Now they can use an amendment that was illegally ratified to claim "rights" intended (supposedly) to give Black people equal status. Yet the law was clear. Marriage in the Republic was one man married to one woman. So, there is where the gays want to acknowledge the Republic in order to circumvent the will of the majority.

Lastly, IF the American people lived up to their culture they would "be fruitful and multiply." Yes, as this generation gets old and dies off; as homosexuality becomes more of a thing and can produce no offspring, you always need a fresh supply of people to replenish the older generation to pay into Socialist Security and pay other taxes requisite to keep the system running. You can either import immigrants OR you can incentivize the younger generation to keep our culture and heritage alive.

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

Just post this next time. It would save you a lot of time and be more accurate.

 

[Joe King]

Saying a child abuse victim would only be damaged if they are gay is disgusting.

Where I live, age of consent is 17. I find it hard to believe that a 16yo boy who is likely close to being 17, was damaged by that teacher.

Yes she legally did wrong and deserves her punishment, but in no way was that particular 16yo damaged by the act.

 

[Joe King]

you always need a fresh supply of people to replenish the older generation to pay into Socialist Security

That's only because SS was set up as a Ponzi scheme.

You can either import immigrants OR you can incentivize the younger generation to keep our culture and heritage alive.

Get rid of the Ponzi scheme that is SS and the gov won't need all those immigrants to keep the system solvent.

That's why they upped the legal immigration to 1 million per year back in '65. The gov knew that in the (then) future, it would need more warm bodies to keep the Ponzi scheme going.

It was stupid to start a system that could only work if there were an ever increasing number of people in order to keep it going. Ie: classic definition of a Ponzi scheme.

 

[Joe King]

Lastly, IF the American people lived up to their culture they would "be fruitful and multiply."

That can't happen due to the gov's and fed's fiscal and monetary mismanagement that made it cost prohibitive for every family to have a half dozen or so kids, as was more normal in the days when SS was started.

 

[LafesterMacintosh]

Where I live, age of consent is 17. I find it hard to believe that a 16yo boy who is likely close to being 17, was damaged by that teacher.

Yes she legally did wrong and deserves her punishment, but in no way was that particular 16yo damaged by the act.

Some of you retards are insanely easy to be trolled by that faggot.

 

[TheResister]

Just post this next time. It would save you a lot of time and be more accurate.

Your dumbassery is amusing. Anything you don't like equals a conspiracy theory. Your damn hat won't fit, so quit offering it. Get off your ass and go get some help.

 

[TheResister]

That can't happen due to the gov's and fed's fiscal and monetary mismanagement that made it cost prohibitive for every family to have a half dozen or so kids, as was more normal in the days when SS was started.

So we can afford the kids of foreigners, but not our own?

 

[TheResister]

That's only because SS was set up as a Ponzi scheme.


Get rid of the Ponzi scheme that is SS and the gov won't need all those immigrants to keep the system solvent.

That's why they upped the legal immigration to 1 million per year back in '65. The gov knew that in the (then) future, it would need more warm bodies to keep the Ponzi scheme going.

It was stupid to start a system that could only work if there were an ever increasing number of people in order to keep it going. Ie: classic definition of a Ponzi scheme.

And my personal convictions haven't changed in decades. We do not need any new citizens from foreign countries. We should institute a moratorium on citizenship until we can balance immigration out and manage it.

 

[Joe King]

So we can afford the kids of foreigners, but not our own?

If we keep the foreigners out to begin with, why would we need to pay for their kids?

 

[LafesterMacintosh]

Your dumbassery is amusing. Anything you don't like equals a conspiracy theory. Your damn hat won't fit, so quit offering it. Get off your ass and go get some help.

Trolled

 

[CuriousFiend]

Trolled

 

[TheResister]

If we keep the foreigners out to begin with, why would we need to pay for their kids?

Let me tell you a secret and you probably never heard it before:

We can't keep "them" out. Most people from south of the border are now related to an American citizen. Separating families went over like a fart in Sunday School. We can slow down the rate of citizenship; we can encourage companies to hire an all American staff. We can replenish our own people, but you can't keep "them" out. Just a question for my own edification: How do you suppose that the United States came into being and became the greatest nation in the annals of recorded history AND maintained their cultural, racial and ethnic values with open borders?

 

[Liquid Reigns]

Let me tell you a secret and you probably never heard it before:

We can't keep "them" out. Most people from south of the border are now related to an American citizen. Separating families went over like a fart in Sunday School. We can slow down the rate of citizenship; we can encourage companies to hire an all American staff. We can replenish our own people, but you can't keep "them" out. Just a question for my own edification: How do you suppose that the United States came into being and became the greatest nation in the annals of recorded history AND maintained their cultural, racial and ethnic values with open borders?

We've never had open borders, except when Democrats are in charge as of late. Passports have been required to enter the US since its inception. Passports have been around for thousands of years.

A brief history of the passport

From a royal letter to a microchip.

www.theguardian.com

The concept of being under one ruler’s protection, while in the lands of another, has probably existed since rulers and lands were first invented, but the earliest mention of an object we might recognise as a passport appears in the Bible, in the often overlooked book of Nehemiah.

In the month of Nisan in the 20th year of the ancient Persian king Artaxerxes (around 450BC in new money), the prophet, who was working as a royal cup-bearer, is granted letters from the king requesting the governors of the lands beyond the Euphrates to grant him safe passage to Judah. The purpose of Nehemiah’s visit, incidentally, was to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem.


In Britain, the earliest surviving reference to a “safe conduct” document appears during the reign of Henry V, in an Act of Parliament dated 1414. At that time, documents like these could be issued by the king to anyone, whether they were English or not. Foreign nationals even got theirs free of charge, while English subjects had to pay. Needless to say, the monarch did not - and still does not - need a safe conduct document.

and another

The Passport Throughout History - The Evolution of a Document - IMI - Investment Migration Insider

Nicola Mangion traces the history of the passport back to 2,500 years ago and finds that the earliest such documents were actually more akin to visas.

www.imidaily.com

 

[Liquid Reigns]

Let me tell you a secret and you probably never heard it before:

We can't keep "them" out. Most people from south of the border are now related to an American citizen. Separating families went over like a fart in Sunday School. We can slow down the rate of citizenship; we can encourage companies to hire an all American staff. We can replenish our own people, but you can't keep "them" out. Just a question for my own edification: How do you suppose that the United States came into being and became the greatest nation in the annals of recorded history AND maintained their cultural, racial and ethnic values with open borders?

We can keep them out, Trump had them waiting in Mexico, Biden fucked that up.

No, most people from south of our border do not have relatives that are American Citizens.

The threat of separating families kept many from coming under Trump. Why do you think once Biden got into office they came at record numbers?

The rate of citizenship has nothing to do with illegal immigrants.

I agree, we should encourage companies to hire US citizens first.

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

We've never had open borders, except when Democrats are in charge as of late. Passports have been required to enter the US since its inception. Passports have been around for thousands of years.

A brief history of the passport

From a royal letter to a microchip.

www.theguardian.com

and another

The Passport Throughout History - The Evolution of a Document - IMI - Investment Migration Insider

Nicola Mangion traces the history of the passport back to 2,500 years ago and finds that the earliest such documents were actually more akin to visas.

www.imidaily.com

You’re right but requiring a passport by law doesn’t mean many of these people had them when they arrived here.

Speed limits are the law too but we all know how that goes.

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

We can keep them out, Trump had them waiting in Mexico, Biden fucked that up.

No, most people from south of our border do not have relatives that are American Citizens.

The threat of separating families kept many from coming under Trump. Why do you think once Biden got into office they came at record numbers?

The rate of citizenship has nothing to do with illegal immigrants.

I agree, we should encourage companies to hire US citizens first.

Tax incentives for hiring American and paying strong wages is a no brainer. Companies should get further tax incentives if they reshore and an incentive (albeit less) to near shore.

 

[Liquid Reigns]

You’re right but requiring a passport by law doesn’t mean many of these people had them when they arrived here.

Speed limits are the law too but we all know how that goes.

I agree, most coming here are economic refugees and don't have passports, but what they don't get is a free pass to enter and stay, 99% of them don't qualify for asylum either. The issue is they fail to show up for their court dates and to try to find them and repatriate them is a nightmare. What this administration should be doing is deporting them once they are caught via "expedited removal".

Maybe this is the best idea:

https://thepostmillennial.com/quality-of-life-in-chicago-is-so-poor-that-illegal-immigrants-are-running-back-to-their-home-countries

 

[s-ou-thern]

View attachment 208483View attachment 208483

I’m willing to bet Clyde McDonald is banging her too…

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

With the vast majority being old as the hills.

Although I did have a really hot art teacher in HS. The Spanish teacher was hot too, although I was not in her class.


Yes, legally speaking. Most likely, the only reason she got busted is because jr prolly couldn't keep his mouth shut about it.

The only way a 16yo boy would be "damaged" by his hot 27yo teacher doin' the dirty with him, is if he is gay and deathly afraid of pussy.



The 19% prolly just represents the ones who got caught.

You going to defend this child molester too?

New Jersey gym teacher allegedly sexually assaulted her student over 4 years

New Jersey gym teacher Lydia Pinto, 38, faces criminal charges including first-degree aggravated sexual assault in relation to an alleged four-year relationship with a former student.

www.foxnews.com

 

[weaponoffreedom]

I am against pedophilia.

A 17 year old student, male or female is not child by any definition. A high 5 should be awarded. When I was 15, I had sex with my friends aunt, several times, did I feel molested, no. Do I today, no. As long as it is consensual=ok.

I am sure this sort of thing happens more than what is reported.

 

[Goldhedge]

Teacher's gonna teach!

 

[Jake Broe Stan]

I am against pedophilia.

A 17 year old student, male or female is not child by any definition. A high 5 should be awarded. When I was 15, I had sex with my friends aunt, several times, did I feel molested, no. Do I today, no. As long as it is consensual=ok.

I am sure this sort of thing happens more than what is reported.

You can’t claim to be against pedophilia then support pedophilia.

If they can’t give consent to puberty blockers or enlisting in the military then they can give consent for sex.

Your abuse creating a bias towards pedophilia is unsurprising. Pedos were often abused themselves.