Finishing up "Bearing the Cross" currently. It's disappointing to me that King was so taken with Marx's work; something I don't remember learning in school. Pushed for red China to be admitted to the UN, claimed to be anti-communist but was 100% socialist, employed and no problem working with "former" communists, and began focusing on the evils of capitalism in his speeches towards the end. Zero doubt these are the issues the IE took him out for.
Read "Grant" before the above. It's too bad he gets stuck in Lincoln's long shadow, because he's one of the greatest figures in American history. I almost typed "American political history", but he never fit into politics until after his two terms had ended. He was a simple man, not the type you'd expect to have such a lasting impact on our country. Unfortunately, he was a pioneer for globalism and government education, but his wasn't the type of mind to see the negative consequences either of these programs could have in the distant future. Like King's infatuation with Marxism, I think he only had good intentions in mind when pushing these ideas.
Both of these were 40+ hour audiobooks, so, as much as I've loved learning about both figures, I'm ready for some "Rhythm of War"!