LAC Vol.2 New Fraqqle Rock thread
- Thread starter AC2021
- Start date
Law Abiding Citizens second volume.
Here is the FBI document President Trump re-declassified this term. It was secretly and retroactively re-classified by Obama's crony Lisa Monaco and John Brennan's crony Avril Haines during Obama's third term. It was raided from President Trump's home, Mar-a-Lago. Why is it so important?
The document shows that John Brennan's and Jim Comey's operative Stefan Halper started the FBI investigation of President Trump on a false pretenses. Halper falsely testified as part of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation that he personally witnessed me leaving a dinner at Cambridge University with President Trump's National Security Advisor General Flynn, alone, that we had an affair and that I was a Russian spy.
Halper's co-conspirator, British spy Christopher Steele, repeated the lie to make it sound true. This lie was needed to create the "smoke" of Trump-Russia collusion, with the goal of removing President Trump.
Everyone knew the story was a complete lie. I am a respected, published British academic, have a husband, am a mother, was pregnant at the time of the false report, and have never been alone in a room with General Flynn, let alone had an affair. Comey knew it, Brennan knew it, the FBI files say so.
But they had to continue with this outlandish lie, because that's all they had to try and remove President Trump by saying he represented threat to National Security by appointing a Russian intelligence asset into a top national security position.
I exposed their big lie about President Trump. I knew the story was completely manufactured, and publicly said so, despite threats and intimidation. Further, I was told by journalists about the existence of this FBI document in 2017 and I fought for years to have it released.
President Trump found, declassified and released it during the last week of his first administration. It showed that their whole Trump-Russia collusion was built on an outlandish lie. That's why the Obama-Brennan-Comey people raided to hide this document, and charged President Trump under the Espionage Act for possessing it and releasing it.
Jensen Huang just made the case for American empire. Said it plain. Didn’t flinch. Didn’t walk it back. And almost nobody caught what he actually admitted.
Jensen Huang: “The amount of compute in the United States is a hundred times more than anywhere else in the world.”One hundred times. That is not a market lead. That is a monopoly on the future of intelligence. The kind that compounds every six months until no one else can close the distance.
Jensen Huang: “We make sure that the US labs are the first to hear about it and the first chance to buy it.”Every chip Nvidia designs. Every architecture they ship. America gets first access. Everyone else gets what is left.
That is not a sales strategy. That is arms distribution with a quarterly earnings call.
Jensen Huang: “And if they don’t have enough money, we even invest in them.
”The company building the weapons is bankrolling the people who fire them.
Nvidia is no longer a public company. It is a state instrument with a stock ticker.
Jensen Huang: “Why would you want the United States to give up the world?
”The CEO of the most valuable hardware company on earth did not hedge that. Did not qualify it. He said it like it was obvious. Because to him, it is.
Nations used to be measured by steel output. Then oil reserves. Then warhead count.
Now it is how much intelligence they can produce per second.
Compute is no longer a commodity. It is a strategic resource. Like uranium in 1944. Except this one doubles faster than anyone can respond.
Europe understands none of this. They are drafting AI regulations. Compliance frameworks. Ethics panels. Risk tiers.
They are bringing paperwork to a physics war.
You cannot govern intelligence you do not have the silicon to produce.
China gets it. That is why they are building fabs, not filing comment periods. Nvidia already made sure the gap is not annual. It is generational.
Silicon Valley still thinks it is building consumer software. Huang just told them they are building American infrastructure.
Every model trained here runs on machines that exist nowhere else. Every company that scales here scales on silicon no rival can touch.
The world thinks Nvidia sells chips.
Nvidia sells the ability to think. And they only sell it under one flag.
The von der Leyen quote is one of the most revealing things a European leader has said in the last decade and almost nobody is going to process it correctly.
“The cheapest energy is the one you don’t use.”
That is a sentence spoken by a person presiding over civilizational decline who has decided to reframe the decline as virtue. It’s not a policy statement. It’s a theological position.
The energy crisis isn’t a problem to be solved by producing more energy. It’s an opportunity for Europeans to need less. To want less. To consume less. To live smaller lives in smaller apartments heated to lower temperatures with less travel and less activity and less economic output. The scarcity isn’t a failure. It’s the goal.
This is the thing Americans and everyone outside of Europe cannot fully grasp about where European elite thinking has landed. They genuinely believe that reducing European energy consumption is morally good regardless of the economic consequences, because European consumption is tied to European environmental guilt which is tied to European colonial guilt which is tied to a broader belief that European civilization has been net negative for the world and should shrink. The energy crisis gives them political cover to implement policies that would otherwise be unpopular. Now they can say circumstances force the reduction when the reduction was always the plan.
Von der Leyen is not an aberration. She represents the consensus view among the European political class. Macron believes this. Scholz believes this. The entire EU Commission believes this. They don’t say it this directly usually because it polls badly, but every major policy they implement is consistent with this worldview. Degrowth is not a fringe academic position in European politics. It’s the operating framework at the top.
The American version of this framing would be “the cheapest energy is the one we produce ourselves at scale.” That’s what actually reduces cost and increases resilience. Building more nuclear, extracting more gas, expanding the grid, investing in new production. The European version is the opposite. Don’t build anything. Don’t extract anything. Don’t produce anything. Just use less. And when citizens can’t heat their homes or fly for work, frame it as virtue.
This is why Europe can’t recover from the current trajectory. The recovery would require a complete reversal of the ideological framework that produced the decline, and that framework is held most strongly by exactly the people who have the power to change it. They’re not going to reverse it because they don’t see the trajectory as a problem. They see it as necessary and good.
Similar threads
