LAC Vol.2 New Fraqqle Rock thread

Law Abiding Citizens second volume.
No. I despise Lutnick and Wiles. I think Lutnick deserves a full investigation. If done properly I think it would result in a lifetime prison sentence.
So why does our President have such vile scum in such a position? Surely, he isn't the only one who could do the job. What about Wiles? I mean we have legitimate concerns about these people. No way a man of such integrity would surround himself with pedo scum and an Israeli asset. Shit doesnt add up. Meanwhile, the Technocrat mafia is fast setting up the surveillance state. Didn't they just vote to extend the spying on governments public enemy number 1? The armed Patriot! Someone, defend this. I am waiting for one of the Q guys to explain it all to me.
 
1776536982311.webp

1776536993968.webp

1776537013342.webp

1776537027687.webp
 
I’ve been bitching about Wiles for the past year. A lot of us have.
So what is the angle? All we get is a carrot on a stick, dangling hopium. Meanwhile the technocratic noose is tightening. Soon enough you cant fart without the surveillance state knowing you had beans the night before. Yet, here we are not really networking, not really doing anything but waiting. Ask Solzhenitsyn how that worked out for the Russian people.
 
So why does our President have such vile scum in such a position? Surely, he isn't the only one who could do the job. What about Wiles? I mean we have legitimate concerns about these people. No way a man of such integrity would surround himself with pedo scum and an Israeli asset. Shit doesnt add up. Meanwhile, the Technocrat mafia is fast setting up the surveillance state. Didn't they just vote to extend the spying on governments public enemy number 1? The armed Patriot! Someone, defend this. I am waiting for one of the Q guys to explain it all to me.
If I decided I wanted to agree with every single thing a politician did I would be a Democrat.

No person capable of individual thought would ever agree with another person on everything. That’s for the influencers and sheep crowd.
 
If I decided I wanted to agree with every single thing a politician did I would be a Democrat.

No person capable of individual thought would ever agree with another person on everything. That’s for the influencers and sheep crowd.
This just isn't any person though. This is the Predident of the United States. The highest office in the land. Entrusted with making good appointments and getting the right people in the rights spots. You cant just dismiss this as a small disagreement. Or maybe you can, you just did. I have to wonder what Lutnick' role in this is. As i did that scumbag Pence, and Barr, and every other mishire this guy had made. Blind allegiance is a comfortable place to be. I will never get there.
 
I like this appointment a lot....


I’m sorry. Nothing is going to come from the Russia collusion hoax. The evidence has been there for years.

The DC establishment and political class will just continue to ignore everything because they thought taking out Trump by any means necessary was okay. Same for Democrats in general and the paid protesters. Same for the corrupt judicial system. The deck is stacked against honest citizens.
 
I've been cleaning 99 years of files in her home. I have found one file cabinet drawer full of files on her side of the family. She gave me every letter I sent her over my lifetime plus every note she got from my teachers back to first grade. She kept them all. One of my cousins on my Dad's side wrote a book about that side of our family and had it published. We all got copies.
Sitting in What a Burger crying like a baby remembering going through my mom’s stuff and finding the same kind of stuff.


The portly Hispanic teen moping the floor in a yellow safety vest is looking at me and judging me. I blame you.
 
So why does our President have such vile scum in such a position? Surely, he isn't the only one who could do the job. What about Wiles? I mean we have legitimate concerns about these people. No way a man of such integrity would surround himself with pedo scum and an Israeli asset. Shit doesnt add up. Meanwhile, the Technocrat mafia is fast setting up the surveillance state. Didn't they just vote to extend the spying on governments public enemy number 1? The armed Patriot! Someone, defend this. I am waiting for one of the Q guys to explain it all to me.
Gotta trust the plan! It’s 7D chess. We can’t possibly understand it.
 

ECONOMIC FURY: Why Trump's Warning Went ONLY to Britain​

Susan Kokinda argues that recent U.S. actions framed as confronting Iran are actually aimed at dismantling the British imperial financial and geopolitical system. She cites Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s April 16 meeting with UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves, highlighting the on-record “Economic Fury” campaign and U.S. tracking of financial flows to Iran that allegedly lead to London. The episode shows Trump is ending a decades-old “world extortion” model tied to the Strait of Hormuz, Lloyd’s war-risk insurance, and London’s commodity pricing power (gold, metals, oil benchmarks). It also points to an Israeli–Lebanon ceasefire and Trump prohibiting Israeli strikes, arguing this removes Netanyahu’s leverage built on a perpetual Iran threat. With London’s pricing nodes shifting toward New York and the “special relationship” weakening, the Hudson Institute is said to be pinning hopes on a King Charles visit to the U.S.

00:00 The Saturday Wrap-Up - "ECONOMIC FURY": Why Trump's Warning Went ONLY to Britain - April 18, 2026
02:20 Why Trump Disarmed Netanyahu, Not Just Iran
06:23 Bessent's "Economic Fury" Warning — Delivered Only to London
09:25 Hudson's Hail Mary: Send the King to Save It

 
You know how I know you haven't read every page? Go back a page or two for the context you seek.
Yeah, I did actually, it took me 3 pages to catch up, but the burning question at the time you posted it was "What? context?"...

Why?

Because you probably should have given the context with your post instead of leaving us wondering what the heck you were talking about and having everyone wade through to figure it out.

It's like walking into the middle of a movie not knowing what happened earlier?

A courtesy would be to make the point with the context at the time. Saves bandwidth too!

"Thank you for your attention to this matter."
 

Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom