Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Millions face eviction as moratorium nears end

Lilburncock

Poster
Joined
Jun 8, 2021
Messages
85
There doesn’t need to be a federal law that grants that power to the director of the CDC explicitly.

The president has that authority under the Stanford Act. He is allowed to delegate that authority to the CDC director until Congress or the SCOTUS says otherwise (which they haven’t to date).

Don’t let yore ignorance continue to take you down the road to stupidity.

Most importantly:

View attachment 37236

Edit to add:

Its 42 U.S.C. 5201 or simply put the “miscellaneous” section of the Stanford Act.
Looks like the SC agrees with me on the eviction moratorium.

In the future pay attention to me and learn.

BTW, shut up about a fricking avatar, I'll never have one due to your whiney ass attitude about them.
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097
Looks like the SC agrees with me on the eviction moratorium.

In the future pay attention to me and learn.

BTW, shut up about a fricking avatar, I'll never have one due to your whiney ass attitude about them.
They didn’t agree with you. They issued a knew ruling.

Why would I pay attention to someone who was wrong especially when I was right?

60126B32-F25E-494C-AE39-27A0F16089BB.jpeg
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097

Now we wait and see if the parliamentarian allows this into the reconciliation bill.
 

Rebarcock.

Your(e)humble servant
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
10,409
If all those people, who were forced not to work, got 600.00 a wk from feds and their state benefit actually got that money. Then why did they default on rent? That plus all the stimulus payments should have been more than enough when rent was due
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097
Fuck that...we can't have millions of foreclosures either because a bunch of freeloading assholes refused to go get a fucking job
What % of the folks facing eviction do you think fall into that category.

Same goes for the landlords; what % do you think will face foreclosure?

Didn’t 08 prove we could survive some foreclosures?

As someone against the moratorium I’m genuinely curious to read yore answers.
 

thenick_ttu

Elite
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
995
Millions of landlords still gonna get fucked.

Wealth redistribution.
Which is fucking bullshit because many of these landlords don’t have “wealth” to redistribute. They can barely make ends meet when they aren’t receiving their rightful rent payments.
 

grimm515

Elite
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2021
Messages
710
I can't imagine being a landlord with some non-paying deadbeats. Honestly, I would probably murder them, burn the bodies, and dump the ashes in a lake. But, that's just me.

mGgqew.gif
 

CDDP

Legendary
Founder
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
6,382
The fact that the ruling was 6 - 3 and not 9 - 0 should terrify EVERYONE

3 do not believe in the rule of law of any sort or kind. This place is so finished
 

t_money86

Legendary
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
2,974
The fact that the ruling was 6 - 3 and not 9 - 0 should terrify EVERYONE

3 do not believe in the rule of law of any sort or kind. This place is so finished
Well you had to know that to be the case by who appointed them.
 

t_money86

Legendary
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
2,974
What % of the folks facing eviction do you think fall into that category.

Same goes for the landlords; what % do you think will face foreclosure?

Didn’t 08 prove we could survive some foreclosures?

As someone against the moratorium I’m genuinely curious to read yore answers.
I don't give a shit what the percentages are. If you are going to do a fucking eviction moratorium which allows renters to NOT pay their fucking obligation, you better also put in place a moratorium for the property owners from losing their property to banks that hold their notes. This move was 100% intended to remove property from private individuals so corporations could swoop in and gobble them up. Taking property away from US Citizens is part of the goal to take this country down. Agenda 2030. "You will own nothing and be happy about it"
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097
I don't give a shit what the percentages are. If you are going to do a fucking eviction moratorium which allows renters to NOT pay their fucking obligation, you better also put in place a moratorium for the property owners from losing their property to banks that hold their notes. This move was 100% intended to remove property from private individuals so corporations could swoop in and gobble them up. Taking property away from US Citizens is part of the goal to take this country down. Agenda 2030. "You will own nothing and be happy about it"
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097
A knew ruling that said what they tried to do was not legal.

Because it's your opportunity to become a smarter person.
Except I was the one that had to explain to you why they needed a new ruling.

Would they have issued another ruling if I wasn’t right?

This is yore opportunity to become a smarter person.
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097
Don't know what your deal is but over the past several months you've become a bit of a cunt.
Just call me like I see them.

Do you think everyone who disagrees with you is a “cunt”?
 

Lilburncock

Poster
Joined
Jun 8, 2021
Messages
85
Except I was the one that had to explain to you why they needed a new ruling.

Would they have issued another ruling if I wasn’t right?

This is yore opportunity to become a smarter person.
No, I explained to you that the court clearly told the traitor in charge that trying to issue another order of that kind was clearly unconstitutional.

The traitor in the chief then went forward and ignored the court's message.

It was never legal neither the first time nor the second.

I hope this is clear to you, right and wrong so not change. It was wrong, it is wrong, and it will always be wrong.

BTW, if you are so insecure in who you are a to need a picture (avatar) as least get one with some tits.
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097
No, I explained to you that the court clearly told the traitor in charge that trying to issue another order of that kind was clearly unconstitutional.

The traitor in the chief then went forward and ignored the court's message.

It was never legal neither the first time nor the second.

I hope this is clear to you, right and wrong so not change. It was wrong, it is wrong, and it will always be wrong.

BTW, if you are so insecure in who you are a to need a picture (avatar) as least get one with some tits.
Thanks for confirming you have no clue how judicial process works.

“Wrong” 😂
 

America 1st

The best poster on the board! Trumps lover! 🇺🇸
Founder
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
16,097
Thanks for confirming you are no better than a cheap lawyer who thinks law makes right.

I knew you wouldn't understand.
Shirley yore not suggesting these landlords hold the moral “right” in this case are you?
 
Top Bottom