Millions face eviction as moratorium nears end

[Lilburncock]

There doesn’t need to be a federal law that grants that power to the director of the CDC explicitly.

The president has that authority under the Stanford Act. He is allowed to delegate that authority to the CDC director until Congress or the SCOTUS says otherwise (which they haven’t to date).

Don’t let yore ignorance continue to take you down the road to stupidity.

Most importantly:

View attachment 37236

Edit to add:

Its 42 U.S.C. 5201 or simply put the “miscellaneous” section of the Stanford Act.

Looks like the SC agrees with me on the eviction moratorium.

In the future pay attention to me and learn.

BTW, shut up about a fricking avatar, I'll never have one due to your whiney ass attitude about them.

 

[America 1st]

Looks like the SC agrees with me on the eviction moratorium.

In the future pay attention to me and learn.

BTW, shut up about a fricking avatar, I'll never have one due to your whiney ass attitude about them.

They didn’t agree with you. They issued a knew ruling.

Why would I pay attention to someone who was wrong especially when I was right?

 

[America 1st]

Now we wait and see if the parliamentarian allows this into the reconciliation bill.

 

[Rebarcock.]

If all those people, who were forced not to work, got 600.00 a wk from feds and their state benefit actually got that money. Then why did they default on rent? That plus all the stimulus payments should have been more than enough when rent was due

 

[t_money86]

Sucks for investors but you can’t have millions of homeless people.

Fuck that...we can't have millions of foreclosures either because a bunch of freeloading assholes refused to go get a fucking job

 

[America 1st]

Fuck that...we can't have millions of foreclosures either because a bunch of freeloading assholes refused to go get a fucking job

What % of the folks facing eviction do you think fall into that category.

Same goes for the landlords; what % do you think will face foreclosure?

Didn’t 08 prove we could survive some foreclosures?

As someone against the moratorium I’m genuinely curious to read yore answers.

 

[Lilburncock]

They didn’t agree with you. They issued a knew ruling.

Why would I pay attention to someone who was wrong especially when I was right?

View attachment 42680

A knew ruling that said what they tried to do was not legal.

Because it's your opportunity to become a smarter person.

 

[thenick_ttu]

Millions of landlords still gonna get fucked.

Wealth redistribution.

Which is fucking bullshit because many of these landlords don’t have “wealth” to redistribute. They can barely make ends meet when they aren’t receiving their rightful rent payments.

 

[grimm515]

I can't imagine being a landlord with some non-paying deadbeats. Honestly, I would probably murder them, burn the bodies, and dump the ashes in a lake. But, that's just me.

 

[CDDP]

The fact that the ruling was 6 - 3 and not 9 - 0 should terrify EVERYONE

3 do not believe in the rule of law of any sort or kind. This place is so finished

 

[t_money86]

The fact that the ruling was 6 - 3 and not 9 - 0 should terrify EVERYONE

3 do not believe in the rule of law of any sort or kind. This place is so finished

Well you had to know that to be the case by who appointed them.

 

[t_money86]

What % of the folks facing eviction do you think fall into that category.

Same goes for the landlords; what % do you think will face foreclosure?

Didn’t 08 prove we could survive some foreclosures?

As someone against the moratorium I’m genuinely curious to read yore answers.

I don't give a shit what the percentages are. If you are going to do a fucking eviction moratorium which allows renters to NOT pay their fucking obligation, you better also put in place a moratorium for the property owners from losing their property to banks that hold their notes. This move was 100% intended to remove property from private individuals so corporations could swoop in and gobble them up. Taking property away from US Citizens is part of the goal to take this country down. Agenda 2030. "You will own nothing and be happy about it"

 

[America 1st]

I don't give a shit what the percentages are. If you are going to do a fucking eviction moratorium which allows renters to NOT pay their fucking obligation, you better also put in place a moratorium for the property owners from losing their property to banks that hold their notes. This move was 100% intended to remove property from private individuals so corporations could swoop in and gobble them up. Taking property away from US Citizens is part of the goal to take this country down. Agenda 2030. "You will own nothing and be happy about it"

 

[America 1st]

A knew ruling that said what they tried to do was not legal.

Because it's your opportunity to become a smarter person.

Except I was the one that had to explain to you why they needed a new ruling.

Would they have issued another ruling if I wasn’t right?

This is yore opportunity to become a smarter person.

 

[t_money86]

Don't know what your deal is but over the past several months you've become a bit of a cunt.

 

[America 1st]

Don't know what your deal is but over the past several months you've become a bit of a cunt.

Just call me like I see them.

Do you think everyone who disagrees with you is a “cunt”?

 

[t_money86]

Just call me like I see them.

Do you think everyone who disagrees with you is a “cunt”?

Nope just you. Because you're a cunt. Cunt

 

[America 1st]

Nope just you. Because you're a cunt. Cunt

 

[Lilburncock]

Except I was the one that had to explain to you why they needed a new ruling.

Would they have issued another ruling if I wasn’t right?

This is yore opportunity to become a smarter person.

No, I explained to you that the court clearly told the traitor in charge that trying to issue another order of that kind was clearly unconstitutional.

The traitor in the chief then went forward and ignored the court's message.

It was never legal neither the first time nor the second.

I hope this is clear to you, right and wrong so not change. It was wrong, it is wrong, and it will always be wrong.

BTW, if you are so insecure in who you are a to need a picture (avatar) as least get one with some tits.

 

[America 1st]

No, I explained to you that the court clearly told the traitor in charge that trying to issue another order of that kind was clearly unconstitutional.

The traitor in the chief then went forward and ignored the court's message.

It was never legal neither the first time nor the second.

I hope this is clear to you, right and wrong so not change. It was wrong, it is wrong, and it will always be wrong.

BTW, if you are so insecure in who you are a to need a picture (avatar) as least get one with some tits.

Thanks for confirming you have no clue how judicial process works.

“Wrong”

 

[Lilburncock]

Thanks for confirming you have no clue how judicial process works.

“Wrong”

Thanks for confirming you are no better than a cheap lawyer who thinks law makes right.

I knew you wouldn't understand.

 

[America 1st]

Thanks for confirming you are no better than a cheap lawyer who thinks law makes right.

I knew you wouldn't understand.

Shirley yore not suggesting these landlords hold the moral “right” in this case are you?

 

[Nayat]

 

[Lilburncock]

Shirley yore not suggesting these landlords hold the moral “right” in this case are you?

Too stupid to go farther.

 

[America 1st]

Too stupid to go farther.

Agreed.

The law doesn’t make something right and that’s especially true for these landlords.

We’re just gonna have to agree to disagree.

P.S.