I've been drinking, but want to know why communism and trumpists suck?

Not @rebarcock levels of drinking and opiods, but enough to make this thread...

Communism doesn't work because the initial cash injection required comes from the cannibalization of existing spending. Meaning the cash injection into output that produces all the pretty multipliers is offset immediately by a negative impact to the economy from taking that money out of circulation. Forces a greater reliance on loans and higher taxes to account for the cannibalization and ensuing knock-down effects.

Trumpists suck economically because they push for similar impacts by wanting to close borders and free trade. The key to a successful economy is always encouraging new spending versus replacement spending. Trumpists want replacement spending which takes money out of the economy and reinvests since no external sources exist for initial spending. Creating a similar situation to the commies where there is a negative economic impact offset by a positive one. If you cut off free trade, investment comes from either savings or existing spending rerouted. Both have dampening effects on economic growth. The best way forward is to force new money into yore economy which then creates jobs, labor income, GDP value add, and economic production.

The end.
 
Not @rebarcock levels of drinking and opiods, but enough to make this thread...

Communism doesn't work because the initial cash injection required comes from the cannibalization of existing spending. Meaning the cash injection into output that produces all the pretty multipliers is offset immediately by a negative impact to the economy from taking that money out of circulation. Forces a greater reliance on loans and higher taxes to account for the cannibalization and ensuing knock-down effects.

Trumpists suck economically because they push for similar impacts by wanting to close borders and free trade. The key to a successful economy is always encouraging new spending versus replacement spending. Trumpists want replacement spending which takes money out of the economy and reinvests since no external sources exist for initial spending. Creating a similar situation to the commies where there is a negative economic impact offset by a positive one. If you cut off free trade, investment comes from either savings or existing spending rerouted. Both have dampening effects on economic growth. The best way forward is to force new money into yore economy which then creates jobs, labor income, GDP value add, and economic production.

The end.


Everyone already knows you're a clueless twat. You don't have to keep showing everyone.
That sounds like a CNN talking point, saying anyone that wants a secure border is against free trade. Go get pegged by Maddow u faggit
 
Everyone already knows you're a clueless twat. You don't have to keep showing everyone.
That sounds like a CNN talking point, saying anyone that wants a secure border is against free trade. Go get pegged by Maddow u faggit

If Ohio is yore idea of paradise, by all means please continue.
 
Not @rebarcock levels of drinking and opiods, but enough to make this thread...

Communism doesn't work because the initial cash injection required comes from the cannibalization of existing spending. Meaning the cash injection into output that produces all the pretty multipliers is offset immediately by a negative impact to the economy from taking that money out of circulation. Forces a greater reliance on loans and higher taxes to account for the cannibalization and ensuing knock-down effects.

Trumpists suck economically because they push for similar impacts by wanting to close borders and free trade. The key to a successful economy is always encouraging new spending versus replacement spending. Trumpists want replacement spending which takes money out of the economy and reinvests since no external sources exist for initial spending. Creating a similar situation to the commies where there is a negative economic impact offset by a positive one. If you cut off free trade, investment comes from either savings or existing spending rerouted. Both have dampening effects on economic growth. The best way forward is to force new money into yore economy which then creates jobs, labor income, GDP value add, and economic production.

The end.

Trumpism is about bringing jobs home, not isolationism.
 
Trumpism is about bringing jobs home, not isolationism.
no-shit-shocked.gif

first sentence and the fag outs himself out as an idiot.
 
I know this is a troll thread but the argument about free trade is incorrect. When the US is always in the losing end when paying high tariffs to every trading partner, that's not free trade. That's idiotic trade, but I'm sure this was already known before making this thread.

Not the argument

I'll give a hint to counter argument... "If Trump encourages economic output inside the US from factories, doesn't that mean new wealth is created and thus reinvested as new spending?"
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom