By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!That would be more difficult, but that would be the next thing on my list. As you know, we almost did that with the Fair Tax which was started right here where I live by people I know. Had it not been for the 9 / 11 setup and the perceived "need" for National ID, that would be an item we could take off the list.abolish the IRS
I'm with you in spirit, but not possible in our lifetime.Eliminate the FBI, CIA, Dept. of State, Dept. of Education, IRS and virtually all federal agencies.
Seize all of the assets of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, BlackRock and a few others.
Incarcerate 75% of Congress and seize all their assets.
Revenue always skyrockets and treasury males bank when taxes are cut by meaningful numbers.I would argue, actually, that the government should cut spending AND taxes. Cutting spending seems obvious to me. Cutting taxes, perhaps a bit subtler. The fact is that revenue and tax rate is not a linear relationship - think of it as an upside-down parabola. Initially, as you increase taxes, you get more revenue. But eventually, folks start to find loopholes, get offshore accounts, move businesses out of the US, and so revenue actually declines. I would argue that the US is on that declining side of the parabola. Hence, if we want to increase revenue, we need to encourage businesses to come back to the US by cutting taxes.
Apportionment of taxes would in fact fix it.Return to constitutional taxation
Tax countries south of the border for providing their citizenry with a taxpayer funded education and the strain they put on police departments. They don't pay, we take their land away.Apportionment of taxes would in fact fix it.
Can't have a big bloated gov $33+T in debt without a massive tax base with which to support it.
^^^^Problem solved, and then hang all these treasonous scumbags.Eliminate the FBI, CIA, Dept. of State, Dept. of Education, IRS and virtually all federal agencies.
Seize all of the assets of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, BlackRock and a few others.
Incarcerate 75% of Congress and seize all their assets.
How 'bout just kick their asses out, and save the money?Tax countries south of the border for providing their citizenry with a taxpayer funded education and the strain they put on police departments. They don't pay, we take their land away.
That won't even begin to work.Not surprised to see no serious responses to this very serious question.
Three steps would solve the problem.
1- Fix American healthcare so that it doesn’t cost double what other first world countries spend. This will single-handedly fix the government’s spending problems in relation to Medicare & Medicaid.
2- Eliminate all tax cuts.
3- Institute a flat 1% payroll tax to pay down the national debt to an agreeable number and then have it automatically suspended once that number is reached. That number could be 20 trillion or 0 (up for debate).
If that were to happen, it would return the power of the printing press (so to speak) to congress, who would then use it to fund every asinine project they could think up.Abolish the Fed/all central banks,
That won't even begin to work.
Any health care stuff the gov does, is not gonna lower costs. All it does is shift the cost to the gov.
More taxes is not the answer. Lowering spending, is.
It's cute that you think the gov would ever suspend a tax. All the gov does is to find new uses for the money in order to justify keeping the tax.
The only way the gov will ever get spending under control, is if revenue dries up.
The Founders wrote apportionment into the Constitution in order to prevent the gov becoming a monstrosity such as what is is today.
Troll attempt is way too obvious.If that were to happen, it would return the power of the printing press (so to speak) to congress, who would then use it to fund every asinine project they could think up.
Title | Savings, 2023–2032 (Billions of Dollars) |
---|---|
Establish Caps on Federal Spending for Medicaid | 501 to 871 |
Limit State Taxes on Health Care Providers | 41 to 526 |
Reduce Federal Medicaid Matching Rates | 68 to 667 |
Increase the Premiums Paid for Medicare Part B | 57 to 448 |
Reduce Medicare Advantage Benchmarks | 392 |
Reduce Tax Subsidies for Employment-Based Health Insurance | 500 to 893 |
Reduce Social Security Benefits for High Earners | 40 to 184 |
Set Social Security Benefits to a Flat Amount | 270 to 593 |
Increase the Maximum Taxable Earnings That Are Subject to Social Security Payroll Taxes | 670 to 1,204 |
Reduce Spending on Other Mandatory Programs | 580 |
Reduce the Department of Defense's Annual Budget | 995 |
Reduce Nondefense Discretionary Spending | 332 |
Increase Individual Income Tax Rates | 502 to 1,329 |
Eliminate or Limit Itemized Deductions | 541 to 2,507 |
Impose a New Payroll Tax | 1,136 to 2,253 |
Impose a Tax on Consumption | 1,950 to 3,050 |
Impose a Tax on Emissions of Greenhouse Gases | 571 to 865 |
taxation is theft. everything the government owns is stolen
Title Savings, 2023–2032 (Billions of Dollars) Establish Caps on Federal Spending for Medicaid 501 to 871 Limit State Taxes on Health Care Providers 41 to 526 Reduce Federal Medicaid Matching Rates 68 to 667 Increase the Premiums Paid for Medicare Part B 57 to 448 Reduce Medicare Advantage Benchmarks 392 Reduce Tax Subsidies for Employment-Based Health Insurance 500 to 893 Reduce Social Security Benefits for High Earners 40 to 184 Set Social Security Benefits to a Flat Amount 270 to 593 Increase the Maximum Taxable Earnings That Are Subject to Social Security Payroll Taxes 670 to 1,204 Reduce Spending on Other Mandatory Programs 580 Reduce the Department of Defense's Annual Budget 995 Reduce Nondefense Discretionary Spending 332 Increase Individual Income Tax Rates 502 to 1,329 Eliminate or Limit Itemized Deductions 541 to 2,507 Impose a New Payroll Tax 1,136 to 2,253 Impose a Tax on Consumption 1,950 to 3,050 Impose a Tax on Emissions of Greenhouse Gases 571 to 865
*The numbers in the right hand column reflect billions of dollars saved over the next decade*
Options for Reducing the Deficit
CBO’s Director, Phillip Swagel, uses the agency’s latest report on budget options to illustrate ways to reduce the deficit.www.cbo.gov
If that’s how you feel then move to a country with no taxes.taxation is theft. everything the government owns is stolen
No trolling. It's the truth. Right now the fed controls it. Without the fed, that power would return to congress.Troll attempt is way too obvious.
Ways The United States Can Get Out of Debt
Can the U.S. government tighten its belt enough to dig itself out of debt? Here are options to reduce the national debt, beyond cutting spending and raising income taxes.www.investopedia.com
How about we just go back to the type of taxation the Founders intended?If that’s how you feel then move to a country with no taxes.
Are you dumb enough to actually think that continuing the type of crap that got the gov into $33+T to begin with, is the way to fix the problem?View attachment 207969
I’d address your points if you had made an honest attempt to address mine or been even the slightest bit intellectually honest.
No. Congress has always had that power and still does. The Fed only does what Congress authorized by law.No trolling. It's the truth. Right now the fed controls it. Without the fed, that power would return to congress.
That’s what we have. You do know they are the ones that ratified The Constitution which authorizes our current tax system?How about we just go back to the type of taxation the Founders intended?
Not necessarily. Congress could easily tax enough to balance the budget at current spending levels without depleting the tax base.Are you dumb enough to actually think that continuing the type of crap that got the gov into $33+T to begin with, is the way to fix the problem?
The gov can't tax enough to continue on the spending path it is currently on. Spending has to be cut.
name one thing the government obtained consensually without coercionIf that’s how you feel then move to a country with no taxes.
Try staying on topic but to answer your question the enlistment of millions of volunteers for the armed forces.name one thing the government obtained consensually without coercion
We have neither the capability nor the authority to simply kick people out. That is according to the United States Supreme Court.How 'bout just kick their asses out, and save the money?
While I liked your reply, the problem with Ukraine is that if we pull out, Putin will go after smaller NATO countries that worked with us. That will obligate us and we will have American boots on the ground, fighting Russia. We need to get out of NATO, then you can wave good-bye to being obligated to fight all these wars.Stop giving money to Israel and Ukraine. BOOM. America saved
and who are they?Drain the swamp. Put true constitutionalist in the house and senate.
Try staying on topic but to answer your question the enlistment of millions of volunteers for the armed forces.
Even if that’s what you think (which is certifiably retarded) then the government still acquired something without coercion which you claimed hadn’t ever happened.these “volunteers” are paid with stolen money acquired either by tax or printing.
Just the House and Senate?Drain the swamp. Put true constitutionalist in the house and senate.
The government does not print money or regulate the value thereof. That is done by a private entity.Even if that’s what you think (which is certifiably retarded) then the government still acquired something without coercion which you claimed hadn’t ever happened.
The Founding Fathers acknowledged the government’s right to tax its citizens. That’s why they ratified said right into The Constitution in article I. The same applies to the government’s right to print & coin money (which is also found in article I).
The Federal Reserve is a government entity, not a private one. It derives its powers from Congress according to law.The government does not print money or regulate the value thereof. That is done by a private entity.