Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

In your opinion, what is the most effective way to address the national debt?đź’µ

In your opinion, what is the most effective way to address the national debt?

  • Cutting government spending

    Votes: 13 68.4%
  • Raising taxes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A combination of spending cuts and tax increases

    Votes: 1 5.3%
  • Reducing defense spending

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Investing in economic growth to increase revenue

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other (please specify): ________________

    Votes: 5 26.3%

  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .

TheResister

Elite
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Messages
967
Return to constitutional taxation

1) Audit and then abolish the Federal Reserve
2) Cut federal regulatory agencies in half
3) Shut down BATFE, giving alcohol and tobacco cases to the DEA and any gun violations to the FBI - which would mean cutting anti-gun regulations by half
4) Eliminate the federal Dept. of Education
5) Get the feds out of welfare
6) Cut foreign aid in half

That's my short list
 

STMF2X

Elite
Founder
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
665
Tax Billionaires obviously.

You know what amazes me about the progressive left is people worth 9 figures are in the good column, they are still considered good everyday citizens. But people worth 10 figures are evil, and everything that is wrong with the world.
 

Ackbach

Poster
Joined
Nov 7, 2023
Messages
4
I would argue, actually, that the government should cut spending AND taxes. Cutting spending seems obvious to me. Cutting taxes, perhaps a bit subtler. The fact is that revenue and tax rate is not a linear relationship - think of it as an upside-down parabola. Initially, as you increase taxes, you get more revenue. But eventually, folks start to find loopholes, get offshore accounts, move businesses out of the US, and so revenue actually declines. I would argue that the US is on that declining side of the parabola. Hence, if we want to increase revenue, we need to encourage businesses to come back to the US by cutting taxes.
 

TheResister

Elite
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Messages
967
abolish the IRS
That would be more difficult, but that would be the next thing on my list. As you know, we almost did that with the Fair Tax which was started right here where I live by people I know. Had it not been for the 9 / 11 setup and the perceived "need" for National ID, that would be an item we could take off the list.
 

TheResister

Elite
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Messages
967
Eliminate the FBI, CIA, Dept. of State, Dept. of Education, IRS and virtually all federal agencies.

Seize all of the assets of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, BlackRock and a few others.

Incarcerate 75% of Congress and seize all their assets.
I'm with you in spirit, but not possible in our lifetime.
 

Rebarcock.

Your(e)humble servant
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
11,724
I would argue, actually, that the government should cut spending AND taxes. Cutting spending seems obvious to me. Cutting taxes, perhaps a bit subtler. The fact is that revenue and tax rate is not a linear relationship - think of it as an upside-down parabola. Initially, as you increase taxes, you get more revenue. But eventually, folks start to find loopholes, get offshore accounts, move businesses out of the US, and so revenue actually declines. I would argue that the US is on that declining side of the parabola. Hence, if we want to increase revenue, we need to encourage businesses to come back to the US by cutting taxes.
Revenue always skyrockets and treasury males bank when taxes are cut by meaningful numbers.
How about make Congress take backthe power of a balanced budget and make people work.
Safety nets yes. You hurt and can't work we got you. You are a criminal, chain gang. Wanna lay around and no do shit? Good luck
 

Jayhacker

Legendary
Founder
Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
6,245
Eliminate the FBI, CIA, Dept. of State, Dept. of Education, IRS and virtually all federal agencies.

Seize all of the assets of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, BlackRock and a few others.

Incarcerate 75% of Congress and seize all their assets.
^^^^Problem solved, and then hang all these treasonous scumbags.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,814
Not surprised to see no serious responses to this very serious question.

Three steps would solve the problem.

1- Fix American healthcare so that it doesn’t cost double what other first world countries spend. This will single-handedly fix the government’s spending problems in relation to Medicare & Medicaid.

2- Eliminate all tax cuts.

3- Institute a flat 1% payroll tax to pay down the national debt to an agreeable number and then have it automatically suspended once that number is reached. That number could be 20 trillion or 0 (up for debate).
 

Joe King

Elite
Joined
Jan 2, 2023
Messages
845
Not surprised to see no serious responses to this very serious question.

Three steps would solve the problem.

1- Fix American healthcare so that it doesn’t cost double what other first world countries spend. This will single-handedly fix the government’s spending problems in relation to Medicare & Medicaid.

2- Eliminate all tax cuts.

3- Institute a flat 1% payroll tax to pay down the national debt to an agreeable number and then have it automatically suspended once that number is reached. That number could be 20 trillion or 0 (up for debate).
That won't even begin to work.

Any health care stuff the gov does, is not gonna lower costs. All it does is shift the cost to the gov.

More taxes is not the answer. Lowering spending, is.

It's cute that you think the gov would ever suspend a tax. All the gov does is to find new uses for the money in order to justify keeping the tax.

The only way the gov will ever get spending under control, is if revenue dries up.

The Founders wrote apportionment into the Constitution in order to prevent the gov becoming a monstrosity such as what is is today.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,814
That won't even begin to work.

Any health care stuff the gov does, is not gonna lower costs. All it does is shift the cost to the gov.

More taxes is not the answer. Lowering spending, is.

It's cute that you think the gov would ever suspend a tax. All the gov does is to find new uses for the money in order to justify keeping the tax.

The only way the gov will ever get spending under control, is if revenue dries up.

The Founders wrote apportionment into the Constitution in order to prevent the gov becoming a monstrosity such as what is is today.

IMG_2083.jpeg

I’d address your points if you had made an honest attempt to address mine or been even the slightest bit intellectually honest.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,814
If that were to happen, it would return the power of the printing press (so to speak) to congress, who would then use it to fund every asinine project they could think up.
Troll attempt is way too obvious.

 

Joe King

Elite
Joined
Jan 2, 2023
Messages
845
Troll attempt is way too obvious.

No trolling. It's the truth. Right now the fed controls it. Without the fed, that power would return to congress.
 

Joe King

Elite
Joined
Jan 2, 2023
Messages
845
View attachment 207969

I’d address your points if you had made an honest attempt to address mine or been even the slightest bit intellectually honest.
Are you dumb enough to actually think that continuing the type of crap that got the gov into $33+T to begin with, is the way to fix the problem?

The gov can't tax enough to continue on the spending path it is currently on. Spending has to be cut.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,814
No trolling. It's the truth. Right now the fed controls it. Without the fed, that power would return to congress.
No. Congress has always had that power and still does. The Fed only does what Congress authorized by law.
How about we just go back to the type of taxation the Founders intended?
That’s what we have. You do know they are the ones that ratified The Constitution which authorizes our current tax system?

Are you dumb enough to actually think that continuing the type of crap that got the gov into $33+T to begin with, is the way to fix the problem?

The gov can't tax enough to continue on the spending path it is currently on. Spending has to be cut.
Not necessarily. Congress could easily tax enough to balance the budget at current spending levels without depleting the tax base.

That wouldn’t be nearly as effective as spending reductions coupled with tax increases.

The largest part of the problem is the Keynesian tax cuts that Congress keeps authorizing without matching reductions in spending. Washington is still living by the policies of Reagan and our national debt shows it.



 

TheResister

Elite
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Messages
967
How 'bout just kick their asses out, and save the money?
We have neither the capability nor the authority to simply kick people out. That is according to the United States Supreme Court.

What we can do is to force guest workers to get an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number and pay taxes. Most people here without papers opt that route because immigration status has nothing to do with owing taxes - or so says the IRS.

If the foreign governments are going to assist their citizenry coming here in droves, then those governments should be charged for what it costs us to provide border security, process their citizens, give them taxpayer ID numbers and make sure that their home country pays for any costs we incur taking care of them.
 

TheResister

Elite
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Messages
967
Stop giving money to Israel and Ukraine. BOOM. America saved
While I liked your reply, the problem with Ukraine is that if we pull out, Putin will go after smaller NATO countries that worked with us. That will obligate us and we will have American boots on the ground, fighting Russia. We need to get out of NATO, then you can wave good-bye to being obligated to fight all these wars.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,814
these “volunteers” are paid with stolen money acquired either by tax or printing.
Even if that’s what you think (which is certifiably retarded) then the government still acquired something without coercion which you claimed hadn’t ever happened.

The Founding Fathers acknowledged the government’s right to tax its citizens. That’s why they ratified said right into The Constitution in article I. The same applies to the government’s right to print & coin money (which is also found in article I).
 

TheResister

Elite
Joined
Sep 22, 2023
Messages
967
Even if that’s what you think (which is certifiably retarded) then the government still acquired something without coercion which you claimed hadn’t ever happened.

The Founding Fathers acknowledged the government’s right to tax its citizens. That’s why they ratified said right into The Constitution in article I. The same applies to the government’s right to print & coin money (which is also found in article I).
The government does not print money or regulate the value thereof. That is done by a private entity.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,814
The government does not print money or regulate the value thereof. That is done by a private entity.
The Federal Reserve is a government entity, not a private one. It derives its powers from Congress according to law.


“The Board reports to and is directly accountable to the Congress but, unlike many other public agencies, it is not funded by congressional appropriations.”
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom