I feel robbed
- Thread starter Jtrain80
- Start date
Jtrain80
Legendary
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2021
- Messages
- 3,493
If you have a favorite please post.
George Washington's farewell speech will be represented.
Jtrain80
Legendary
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2021
- Messages
- 3,493
Correct. I was listening to the OP video on the way to work. Man, he had me fired up.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2020
- Messages
- 7,239
John Quincy Adams, son of founding father John Adams, was quoted as saying, "Americans should not go abroad to slay dragons they do not understand in the name of spreading democracy." during his tenure as Secretary of State under the James Monroe administration.
D
Deleted member 2886
Guest
weaponoffreedom
Elite
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2022
- Messages
- 2,780
he was our last elected president methinks
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2021
- Messages
- 13,275
I believe so. After that they thought to themselves "he got to close."
weaponoffreedom
Elite
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2022
- Messages
- 2,780
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2021
- Messages
- 3,280
You wanna feel robbed? Have a stroll through Chicago
D
Deleted member 2886
Guest
Just wait till the Babylonian Talmudists Sanhedrin council finally kicks off forcibly imposing their 620 commandments defined within the 7 categories comprising the Noahide Laws upon all non-"jews" worldwide.
★"Education and Sharing Day"★
Fuck that sounds ghey af.But seriously though, Trump's made no secret that he's down with the Talmudists shit.
Considering(imo) he's definitely gonna win the next presidential election and he's already apparently discussing death penalty options, eg; by firing squads as well as beheading-plus during his brief stint he'd been busily loosening limitations for capital punishment.
Hope ya'll realize that Noahide Laws require execution of any "non-jew" accused of worshipping any thing other than the Talmudists pseudo-"god".
(*be it materialistic shit, money, self, but especially the Christian God.)
Overview of Theocratic Law
1. Commandments Against Idolatry
(57 commandments: 7 positive, 50 negative)
2. Commandments Against Blasphemy
(39 commandments: 14 positive, 25 negative)
3. Commandments Against Murder
(0 commandments: 2 positive, 4-negative)
4. Commandments Against Theft
(37 commandments: 16 positive, 21 negative)
5. Commandments Against Immoral Relations
(32 commandments: 3 positive, 29 negative)
6. Commandments Against Eating Living Animals
(3 commandments: 3 negative)
7. Commandments For Legal Justice
(37 commandments: 15 positive 22 negative)
General Commandments for Orderly Society
(31 commandments: 14 positive. 17 negative)
Optional Commandments
(112 commandments: 51 positive, 56 negative, 5 rabbinical)
Irrelevant / Forbidden Commandments
(235 commandments: 116 positive, 117 negative, 2 rabbinical)
Uncertain Commandments
(31 commandments: 10 positive, 21 negative)
Hasidic University
www.hasidicuniversity.org
PleasureMoose
Legendary
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2021
- Messages
- 3,282
D
Deleted member 2886
Guest
Why?
"White" is just an artificial social construct & designation.
It would be harmless if merely used in a generally descriptive sense—except it's not.
Yeah yeah, i know that might sound meaningless, unless considering that by identifying with certain artificial social constructs there can be major consequences.
What kind of "Person" do you identify as?-if at all.
"So far as legal theory is concerned, a person is any being whom the law regards as capable of rights or duties. Any being that is so capable is a person, whether a human being or not, and no being that is not so capable is a person, even though he be a man. Persons are the substances of which rights and duties are the attributes. It is only in this respect that persons possess juridical significance, and this is the exclusive point of view from which personality receives legal recognition." John Salmond, Jurisprudence 318 (Glanville L. Williams ed., 10th ed. 1947).
"The word 'person' is now generally used in English to denote a human being, but the word is also used in a tech- nical legal sense, to denote a subject of legal rights and duties. English law recognizes two categories of persons in this legal sense: 'natural persons' and 'artificial persons.' Natural persons are those animate beings which possess a capacity to own legal rights and to owe legal duties; artificial persons are sometimes also described as 'legal' or "juristic' persons, but this usage can be confusing, as the latter terms are also used of both animate beings and inanimate entities, to denote the fact that they have an existence as legal actors, rather than the fact that they exist only in the legal, and not in the biological sphere." 1 English Private Law § 3.18, at 142-43 (Peter Birks ed., 2000).
▸ artificial person. (17c) An entity, such as a corporation, created by law and given certain legal rights and duties of a human being; a being, real or imaginary, who for the purpose of legal reasoning is treated more or less as a human being. An entity is a person for purposes of the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses but is not a citizen for purposes of the Privileges and Immunities Clauses in Article IV § 2 and in the Fourteenth Amend- ment. Also termed conventional person; fictitious person; juristic person; juridical person; legal person; moral person. Cf. LEGAL ENTITY.
"The word 'person' is now generally used in English to denote a human being, but the word is also used in a tech- nical legal sense, to denote a subject of legal rights and duties. English law recognizes two categories of persons in this legal sense: 'natural persons' and 'artificial persons.' Natural persons are those animate beings which possess a capacity to own legal rights and to owe legal duties; artificial persons are sometimes also described as 'legal' or "juristic' persons, but this usage can be confusing, as the latter terms are also used of both animate beings and inanimate entities, to denote the fact that they have an existence as legal actors, rather than the fact that they exist only in the legal, and not in the biological sphere." 1 English Private Law § 3.18, at 142-43 (Peter Birks ed., 2000).
▸ artificial person. (17c) An entity, such as a corporation, created by law and given certain legal rights and duties of a human being; a being, real or imaginary, who for the purpose of legal reasoning is treated more or less as a human being. An entity is a person for purposes of the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses but is not a citizen for purposes of the Privileges and Immunities Clauses in Article IV § 2 and in the Fourteenth Amend- ment. Also termed conventional person; fictitious person; juristic person; juridical person; legal person; moral person. Cf. LEGAL ENTITY.
Last edited by a moderator:
weaponoffreedom
Elite
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2022
- Messages
- 2,780
it is culture, not race
D
Deleted member 2886
Guest
Well, i'm unsure of the intended purpose for bringing up that random point.
However with regard for both "culture" & " race" —my original argument remains valid nonetheless.
You'll notice in my original post, it includes three(*of more than a dozen*) paragraphs directly from Blacks Law Dictionary (11th-ed) describing legally defined interpretations of the term - "person".
Within the context of "Law", the legal interpretations & definitions of terms are strictly adhered to —no more, no less.
Which is generally-significantly different to how we non-"Law" trained individuals commonly use & interpret many of the same terms.
What is American "culture"(?)
Is American "culture" "white"(?)
One of the points i'm making, is that these terms are not the actual reality of those things for which such terms are-and can only ever be descriptive tools thereof.
The terms are not reality.
The terms do not define reality.
Ie; the term used to describe a - "pencil" - isn't an actual physical pencil is it.
Although apparently it's quite easy to be tricked into believing otherwise—as is regularly demonstrated by so many modern individuals.
(ie; the idiots who "identify" as various irrational-fictional "gender" concepts, & etcetera.)
Anyways, (and though these may not seem pertinent) here's some screenshots which should be of interest.
weaponoffreedom
Elite
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2022
- Messages
- 2,780
one would not use "pencil" to describe a pencil.
it is a societal concession that "pencil" is used.....if society agreed to change 'pencil" to "knagaf" then that is how it would be named.
likewise, if ones society acts a fool, then acting a fool is the normal, and only until society agrees in consession that they will act not a fool, will it change.........that is what i mean by "its culture"
........also the world would be much better off if Carlin was still alive and doing his act. I have long since thought that the BS of today could not have lived more than a week, 20 years ago.
D
Deleted member 2886
Guest
i know you're pissed at me, and i sympathize with your urge for veiled hostility-which is somewhat reasonable.
Yeah yeah, i know you're a hard cunt and most likely gonna ignore this but you should know it is extremely fucking frustrating because i've tried several times now to subtly convey something critical—butt fuck, ya repeatedly missed every attempt.
Whatever your "ego" seems to have you believing of the situation between us—fuck you and fuck your "ego", it is erroneous!
Now pay attention asshole!
i am trying to fucking protect certain individuals from something cunty!
If i get fucked over, i ain't fucking dragging anyone else down with me ya hear!
i will state this only once!
Cut this pugnacious crap out!
Otherwise i will stop responding &/or will arbitrarily respond in kind, like so....
Cheers.
That is not how it works in reality.
Why would you think "society" gets a say in such matters?
Yeah yeah, i know you're a hard cunt and most likely gonna ignore this but you should know it is extremely fucking frustrating because i've tried several times now to subtly convey something critical—butt fuck, ya repeatedly missed every attempt.
Whatever your "ego" seems to have you believing of the situation between us—fuck you and fuck your "ego", it is erroneous!
Now pay attention asshole!
i am trying to fucking protect certain individuals from something cunty!
If i get fucked over, i ain't fucking dragging anyone else down with me ya hear!
i will state this only once!
Cut this pugnacious crap out!
Otherwise i will stop responding &/or will arbitrarily respond in kind, like so....
...Mr freedom, i require a writing utensil, could you pass me a sharpened graphite/clay core wood stick.
Cheers.
No.
That is not how it works in reality.
Why would you think "society" gets a say in such matters?
Are you sure about that?
Did the more than a hundred "societies" world-wide get any say about the definition change of "vaccine".
Of course not.
i currently expect you'll ignore everything i've just written and if so, fuck ya then.
Why would someone like me suddenly become motivated about learning "Law"!
You must learn this shit too Mr freedom!
It is crucial!
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
Why would someone like me suddenly become motivated about learning "Law"!
You must learn this shit too Mr freedom!
It is crucial!
BLACKS6th_Edition.pdf
drive.google.com
BLACKS7th_Edition.pdf
drive.google.com
BLACKS8th_Edition.pdf
drive.google.com
BLACKS9th_Edition.pdf
drive.google.com
Shibboleths.pdf
drive.google.com
weaponoffreedom
Elite
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2022
- Messages
- 2,780
i know you're pissed at me, and i sympathize with your urge for veiled hostility-which is somewhat reasonable.
Yeah yeah, i know you're a hard cunt and most likely gonna ignore this but you should know it is extremely fucking frustrating because i've tried several times now to subtly convey something critical—butt fuck, ya repeatedly missed every attempt.
Whatever your "ego" seems to have you believing of the situation between us—fuck you and fuck your "ego", it is erroneous!
Now pay attention asshole!
i am trying to fucking protect certain individuals from something cunty!
If i get fucked over, i ain't fucking dragging anyone else down with me ya hear!
i will state this only once!
Cut this pugnacious crap out!
Otherwise i will stop responding &/or will arbitrarily respond in kind, like so....
...Mr freedom, i require a writing utensil, could you pass me a sharpened graphite/clay core wood stick.
Cheers.
No.
That is not how it works in reality.
Why would you think "society" gets a say in such matters?
Are you sure about that?
Did the more than a hundred "societies" world-wide get any say about the definition change of "vaccine".
Of course not.
i currently expect you'll ignore everything i've just written and if so, fuck ya then.
Why would someone like me suddenly become motivated about learning "Law"!
You must learn this shit too Mr freedom!
It is crucial!
BLACKS6th_Edition.pdf
BLACKS7th_Edition.pdf
BLACKS8th_Edition.pdf
BLACKS9th_Edition.pdf
Shibboleths.pdf
Some are not on your level as far a trying to, including me, to pick up on the message sometimes, so sorry if i do not understand.
As i understand you are getting something wrong, about what I am saying...........so "listen" close.
The sky is blue right? Why do we call it blue? If you were to ask 100 people to describe the sky, ill bet most would say "blue", and less would say 'big". Our consession, (you and I) would agree that the item being talked about is in fact the sky, and our conversation could continue unmarked....................but if we were talking about the sky.........big and blue..........we would both be wrong.......liars in fact.........harbingers of deception..............the sky is not big and blue.............but we would agree that in our conversation, the topic is the "sky". That is the concession I am talking about.
There is always a choice. Whether you like the choices available to you or not is a different story.
Similar threads
