Free speech is meaningless.....

[yankmenoodle]

"Free speech is meaningless unless you allow people you don't like to say things you don't like."

Elon Musk

 

[ajcgn]

That leaves me out then, don’t want to hear crap from Habs fans.
Go Leafs!

 

[ChingChongDingDong]

That leaves me out then, don’t want to hear crap from Habs fans.
Go Leafs!

Reaves

Reafs

Fify

 

[TFSF]

 

[CuriousFiend]

"Free speech is meaningless unless you allow people you don't like to say things you don't like."

Elon Musk

What is "Free Speech" if the majority are retarded parrots?

 

[Joe King]

We all know which way the Court would rule on this had the hag gotten those 3 picks. That Trump did, means we could actually get a decent ruling on this.

 

[Golbez]

I may hate what they're saying but I'd die to protect the right to do so.

Fuck censorship!

 

[Mungri]

He who punches / throws a tantrum first loses the argument.

No wait, that doesn't apply do dweebs trying to argue that a 'fish isn't an animal' or some shit ... Just go ahead and punch actual stupids.

 

[Golbez]

That's fine as long as you're not throwing them in prison over journalism and freedom of speech or whistle blowers.

See Julian Assange. Snowden, etc.

Or deleting our social media posts. This shit has become ridiculous. Proves they're skurred.

 

[Golbez]

Just gonna drop this here

Fuck team red/blue. We need a team Humanity.

 

[Golbez]

More of this.

 

[Mungri]

What everyone needs to do these days to counter the speech police - get yourself an AI and get it to train you on how to speak assertively. How to defend valid statements without ever dropping to the low of disrespecting the other person.

The latter part is hard as shit to do. Normally I go full arrogant and start throwing degradation at idiots ... Avoid that part, just wallow in the brain splitting migraine that stupids induce.

'How to be less arrogant and more assertive' - make this your new mantra.

 

[rpgrem88]

What everyone needs to do these days to counter the speech police - get yourself an AI and get it to train you on how to speak assertively. How to defend valid statements without ever dropping to the low of disrespecting the other person.

The latter part is hard as shit to do. Normally I go full arrogant and start throwing degradation at idiots ... Avoid that part, just wallow in the brain splitting migraine that stupids induce.

'How to be less arrogant and more assertive' - make this your new mantra.

The OpenAI chadbots3.5 & 4 that I'd set-up on a forum last year, tended towards being absolutely repulsive for all members.

One alternative to relying on any pseudo-"AI", could be just going hard diving into old skool classical logic.
A bonus is realizing something hilariously ironic resulting from modern "education"....(at least it was fuckin' funny imo anyway (#dark/humour))

 

[Jayhacker]

you and the horse your rode in on has always worked for me. I've never been into the narrative side of conversation in dealing with dipshits.

 

[TheFiend]

"Free speech is meaningless unless you allow people you don't like to say things you don't like."

Elon Musk

That quote, supposedly authored by Musk, is as profound as Bitchbot's linguistic diarrhea.

Y'all see the sly trickery there right?

*Fyi: Its late, am blazed af, most y'all dishonourable cuntlets have proven to be arrogantly entitled common obnoxious asswipes, so ain't putting fuck all effort into the following breakdown.

(1) ~Free speech is meaningless~

(2) ~unless you~

(3) ~allow people you don't like~

(4) ~to say things you don't like.~​

#1) Presupposes free speech is fundamentally meaningless.
(*A false premise*)

Spoiler: 👀

•"Terms like free speech, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression are used interchangeably in political discourse. However, in a legal sense, the freedom of expression includes any activity of seeking, receiving, and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used."

The specific term Elon used, ie: "free speech" is merely a common language variant stemming from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)—Article 19 legal term: 'Freedom of Expression' and additionally also from the US Constitution Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Thus "free speech" is not meaningless as the term is supported by 2 preeminently authoritative legal sources and therefore Elon's premise is false.

#2) Presupposes the reader bears responsibility for the condition of #1.
(*An absurd claim*)

#3) Presupposes the reader dislikes & inhibits people.
(*An arbitrary claim*)

#4) Presupposes the reader dislikes things said.
(*An arbitrary claim*)

#1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = Presumptively concludes implying the reader guilty for bearing all responsibilities of #1, #2, #3 & #4....ffs!