Expand on or question this hypothesis on why the third world SUCKS

[prism]

The three main factors causing third world societies to be so dysfunctional and retrograde, are the following traits in the people:

• Low intelligence, a source of failure at reaching scientific achievements before other, high intelligence societies, always looking towards high intelligence societies for the latest achievements and always trailing behind;
• Low empathy, a source of uncooperation, heightened competitiveness, mistrust, dishonesty, leading to criminality, and corruption. Nothing works as it should but everything can be gamed by the few and powerful;
• Low conscientiousness and low dopamine, sources of underachievement, messiness, dirtiness and laziness and other typically sub-human behavior, which hold back progress.

Other factors:
CULTURE: Tribal superstitions and dysfunctional religions and cultures. Islam included.
HYGIENE: Poor hygiene and sanitation. Dirty water and lack of food. Malnutrition and undernutrition.
DIVERSITY: Ethnic and racial diversity are a major source of low trust and conflict.

I'd like to know what you all think about this, whether you have better explanations or want to refine this further.

 

[AmericanViking]

I think illiteracy can be cultural/religious and is a big factor

Intelligence is affected by culture as well. Some 60% of Muslims are inbred.

 

[Rva]

the main cause is not speaking the English language.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

to be so dysfunctional and retrograde,

I would argue that both of these have nothing to do with 3rd worldness directly. We here in USA are plenty dysfunctional, in many ways.

Retrograde? Not sure what you mean by this, but there are many things about how thing used to be that are in fact better than how they are now.

Low intelligence, a source of failure at reaching scientific achievements before other, high intelligence societies, always looking towards high intelligence societies for the latest achievements and always trailing behind;

I would agree with this. Further I will define "high intelligent societies" to be ethnically Caucasian or Asian/Mongol, and no other. In other words, not African or Latin, in which still hold true today, by in large.

Low empathy, a source of uncooperation, heightened competitiveness, mistrust, dishonesty, leading to criminality, and corruption. Nothing works as it should but everything can be gamed by the few and powerful;

I do not think this has anything to do with empathy, as it does with greed.

Low conscientiousness and low dopamine, sources of underachievement, messiness, dirtiness and laziness and other typically sub-human behavior, which hold back progress.

Sure, but laziness is not what I would use. That world we are speaking of plays by a different set of rules

CULTURE: Tribal superstitions and dysfunctional religions and cultures. Islam included.

The chief difference between Western culture and "3rd world" as you put it, is honor. Western civilization is based on money, while Islam for example is based on honor.

HYGIENE: Poor hygiene and sanitation. Dirty water and lack of food. Malnutrition and undernutrition.

Hmmmm, no. Plenty of folks live very long lives, and are not plagued with cancer and obesity, like here in the USA, so no not really

DIVERSITY: Ethnic and racial diversity are a major source of low trust and conflict.

Most of the countries that would fit into the "3rd World" definition, are not in the least ethnically diverse, nor are they sympathetic to diversity. In fact, there are many examples of ethnic cleansing just for that reason, being against diversity, like in Rwanda, or even Bosnia.



Overall, I say that too much of anything is not good for a society. History has shown that of the different races on this planet, Asian/Mongol and Caucasian, on the regular, hold their shit down pretty good, and "advance" accordingly. I suppose the real question here is what do we see as "advance". For some it is more money, or cars, or houses, for others it is to be a good person, and make the "most" of their time. That is the question. IMO, that you are really asking here. Is one person, who lives in a hut poor? Is the man who lives in Beverly Hills rich? Not sure on either.


Good first post.

 

[fschmidt]

The whole world sucks, with the possible exception of Japan. The only reason that rich countries are rich is because they were good in the past, and they still retain wealth from the past. America is a perfect example that sucks every possible way today.

 

[Rebarcock.]

the main cause is not speaking the English language.

Fucking Mongrels!
Most 3rd worlders I've known or met have been good folks.

I would think a repressive government can do more damage or control the damage/progress is more important than all of that

You can teach retards.
You can learn empathy through living life
Governments can stifle religion.
Example today: Xhina

 

[Rebarcock.]

The whole world sucks, with the possible exception of Japan. The only reason that rich countries are rich is because they were good in the past, and they still retain wealth from the past. America is a perfect example that sucks every possible way today.

Is it better to suck or blow you twisted little Nugget?

 

[Rva]

Fucking Mongrels!
Most 3rd worlders I've known or met have been good folks.

I would think a repressive government can do more damage or control the damage/progress is more important than all of that

You can teach retards.
You can learn empathy through living life
Governments can stifle religion.
Example today: Xhina

The only third world people I have met is when I take a road trip from Texas to Florida in college and had interactions with people from southern Tennessee and Georgia at gas station stations.

 

[Thasubliminal]

Government corruption. Same as 1st and 2nd world

 

[Rebarcock.]

The only third world people I have met is when I take a road trip from Texas to Florida in college and had interactions with people from southern Tennessee and Georgia at gas station stations.

Were there boiled nuts spicy or regular you person I'd scattergun. I'm IrishcisGender. I'm undercover and I got all need tank you fucker

 

[Rva]

Were there boiled nuts spicy or regular you person I'd scattergun. I'm IrishcisGender. I'm undercover and I got all need tank you fucker

I tried to avoid them and their homo erotic nuances as much as I could. Even still, I felt bad for them but better for those who live in., New Mexico, and Southeast Asia

 

[TheFiend]

I think illiteracy can be cultural/religious and is a big factor

Agreed.

Cult, sure is a significant factor.

Just look at ours...where...


..."trust the science", and where we all know politicians are career bullshitspinners—yet we still repeatedly play along with their political charades-over & over... ever perpetuating the societal retardation cycle, for their benefit, at our detriment.

Intelligence is affected by culture as well.

Buttwich 'intelligence' are we referring to here...all of them...?

Just personally, I've interacted with enough "westerners" to know we ain't all abundantly possessed of great intellect... nor in any respect.

Not forgetting for most of us, we would be hard pressed to ever actually interact with any actual Muslim individual in real life or online either. We generally only see the dreggs of so-called "third world" nation states, who I'm sure is glaringly apparent to anyone with the capacity for independent thought, these dreggs aren't escaping anything, they're merely foreign nations lower class citizens being herded by hidden hands from one place to another....


Did you know languages like Arabic, & Hebrew are literally backwards for European language users.

An Arabic or a Hebrew discussion forum like this would be set-up basically the same butt everything will be presented backwards and run from right-to-left...

And yeah I can confirm that it is a gigantic fuck'off pain in the ass trying to type a simple post in English on a RTL language forum.

Some 60% of Muslims are inbred.

Something I quickly learned while doin' all that genealogical shit....is that, (a) 100% of all peoples are inbred, (b) our genetic lines aren't like, I dunno, straight bits of string or whatever, nah....no way mun, it bee lookin' like one fatass dreddlock...or a huge mass of taggled hair.

Plus ....if we each traced every single one of our ancestors back 10 direct generations from each one of us right now, it is highly probable that we'll all discover numerous overlaps just within ten generations alone. (Think the term for this extremely common phenomena was something like 'genetic collapse' or 'ancestral collapse'....(¿?))

 

[TheFiend]

I would argue that both of these have nothing to do with 3rd worldness directly. We here in USA are plenty dysfunctional, in many ways.

Retrograde? Not sure what you mean by this, but there are many things about how thing used to be that are in fact better than how they are now.

I would agree with this. Further I will define "high intelligent societies" to be ethnically Caucasian or Asian/Mongol, and no other. In other words, not African or Latin, in which still hold true today, by in large.

I do not think this has anything to do with empathy, as it does with greed.

Sure, but laziness is not what I would use. That world we are speaking of plays by a different set of rules

The chief difference between Western culture and "3rd world" as you put it, is honor. Western civilization is based on money, while Islam for example is based on honor.

Hmmmm, no. Plenty of folks live very long lives, and are not plagued with cancer and obesity, like here in the USA, so no not really

Most of the countries that would fit into the "3rd World" definition, are not in the least ethnically diverse, nor are they sympathetic to diversity. In fact, there are many examples of ethnic cleansing just for that reason, being against diversity, like in Rwanda, or even Bosnia.



Overall, I say that too much of anything is not good for a society. History has shown that of the different races on this planet, Asian/Mongol and Caucasian, on the regular, hold their shit down pretty good, and "advance" accordingly. I suppose the real question here is what do we see as "advance". For some it is more money, or cars, or houses, for others it is to be a good person, and make the "most" of their time. That is the question. IMO, that you are really asking here. Is one person, who lives in a hut poor? Is the man who lives in Beverly Hills rich? Not sure on either.


Good first post.

Fucking exceptional post right there sir!

The point regarding money/honor is, well, it's bang on point isn't it.

We've essentially been reduced/or perhaps seduced, or both, and now being thoroughly beguiled into a very cunning form of unwittingly-voluntary open slavery—and we're effectively blinded to it, at least most of us are, while many other nations, like in the Arabic world, they apparently see it as maybe akin to a parasite or a cancerous tumor on the "western" nations.

Lately I've interacted with some Arabic individuals, and what strikes me is their civility as well as reasonability.
Which is.... entirely unlike the overwhelming majority of "westerners" I've ever interacted with by a fuckin' long shot aye. Most of us cunts are flagrantly dishonorable imbeciles, exuding hatred, judgement , hypocrisy, and selfishness, there just ain't no denyin' it, we are shamelessly greedy, lustful, arrogant, ignorant, etcetera and so forth...

Bloated pigs, too busy wallowing about in our own materialistic filth, distracted , gorging down whatever festering slops the political slavelords turf our way...