Building 7 WTC

[CDDP]

Tucker questions the building seven 9/11 collapse again. He just brought up the Building Seven BBC media report where they reported that it fell 26 minutes before it actually happened while standing directly in front of the standing building but the government's official stance is to tell us to shut up and not ask questions. He says that most structural engineers will tell you this was an impossible event but the government has gotten so corrupt that the groundwork for a revolution is there, not that he wants it to happen. Free people have the inalienable right to ask whatever questions they want but they refuse to declassify JFK and 9/11 documents because they are lying and it's obvious.

"Why in the world would any 9/11 document be classified? The truth is that secrecy abets dishonesty.

The only reason to keep misdeeds hidden....

 

[TopHook]

 

[TheFiend]

Around a month ago I came across an old news broadcast from 9/12 thats floatin' around and includes clear footage of the former site of the main two towers.

Weird thing about the footage is that there's barely any rubble at all.
Almost appears as if the site had been near completely cleared of rubble overnight...or perhaps the towers had somehow been turned to dust and blown away.

Even the news anchor asked the on-site reporter about the obvious lack of rubble, only the reporter immediately makes out he couldn't hear the question then changes the subject.

 

[Joe King]

As for building 7, I've seen video from inside the building that was taken not long before it collapsed. If I can find it, I'll post it. Nothing remarkable in it, just interesting that it exists.

 

[Shaun52]

 

[Rva]

View attachment 217506

Someone please explain this one to me. I’ve never understood the meaning of it.

 

[TheFiend]

Someone please explain this one to me. I’ve never understood the meaning of it.

I dunno either. Always just assumed it was maybe cheekily implying interest in the topic at hand.

Had a quick look around for an explanation, haven't found one though.

The guy's name is Scott Adams and he's the creator of the Dilbert comic strips.

Apparently at some point he's become targeted by hysterical "left-wing" hypocrites after he discussed the subject of a survey on blacks — which the commie nutters have since spun around as him just straight up being "racist".

But I dunno really. Maybe someone else could elucidate this matter.

 

[MechaJutaro]

Tucker questions the building seven 9/11 collapse again

After two decades, Tucker's courageous and Ahab-esque pursuit of the truth may finally confirm beyond all refutation what we've always known.... 9/11 WAS not the work of those dastardly Hajis, or/and those insidious Ragheads, who've been corrupting our cultural fabric here in The US as engineers, doctors, and hotel owners for an unforgivably long time now

This tragedy is entirely attributable to the machinations The Dirty Jews and The Damned Blacks!!!

 

[Golbez]

Around a month ago I came across an old news broadcast from 9/12 thats floatin' around and includes clear footage of the former site of the main two towers.

Weird thing about the footage is that there's barely any rubble at all.
Almost appears as if the site had been near completely cleared of rubble overnight...or perhaps the towers had somehow been turned to dust and blown away.

Even the news anchor asked the on-site reporter about the obvious lack of rubble, only the reporter immediately makes out he couldn't hear the question then changes the subject.

Bro, have you seen, it's either Loose Change or Zeitgeist: The Movie. They were interviewing 9/11 Firefighters who combed the rubble for survivors, and they couldn't even find an OFFICE CHAIR!! The most somebody found was a piece of a telephone. It was just a bunch of empty building twin tower rubble.

You would think with 3000+ office workers in 220 stories, maybe an office chair or cubicles..... SOMETHING!

For real need some of this shit.



They see this shit being discussed and suddenly OMG CENSOR CENSOR CENSOR!!!!!

 

[Golbez]

 

[weaponoffreedom]

Tucker questions the building seven 9/11 collapse again. He just brought up the Building Seven BBC media report where they reported that it fell 26 minutes before it actually happened while standing directly in front of the standing building but the government's official stance is to tell us to shut up and not ask questions. He says that most structural engineers will tell you this was an impossible event but the government has gotten so corrupt that the groundwork for a revolution is there, not that he wants it to happen. Free people have the inalienable right to ask whatever questions they want but they refuse to declassify JFK and 9/11 documents because they are lying and it's obvious.

"Why in the world would any 9/11 document be classified? The truth is that secrecy abets dishonesty.

The only reason to keep misdeeds hidden....

The 911 Commission Report was the final say of what happened that day, by our government. If in fact all the information is in the report, then it is not classified information.

The truth is, and as many deniers, would like to omit, in modern construction, there has been only 3, steel and concrete reinforced buildings to collapse due to fire, and they all happened in NYC on Sept 11 2001. Never before and never since.

WTC7 was the mistake, the building that was left standing, against all odds, the other buildings did not destroy it when they collapsed.

WTC7 is the smoking gun, behind the truth of the Blood sacrifice that day.

 

[Golbez]

That's what I'm saying. Viva la revolution.

 

[Golbez]

Relevant.

Oh and for those who don't think this is about slavery? Think again.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

Tucker questions the building seven 9/11 collapse again. He just brought up the Building Seven BBC media report where they reported that it fell 26 minutes before it actually happened while standing directly in front of the standing building but the government's official stance is to tell us to shut up and not ask questions. He says that most structural engineers will tell you this was an impossible event but the government has gotten so corrupt that the groundwork for a revolution is there, not that he wants it to happen. Free people have the inalienable right to ask whatever questions they want but they refuse to declassify JFK and 9/11 documents because they are lying and it's obvious.

"Why in the world would any 9/11 document be classified? The truth is that secrecy abets dishonesty.

The only reason to keep misdeeds hidden....

understand, this interview was not on twitter, it was on youtube, The Shawn Ryan Show.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

This is a full report from one of many studies done on the event. "A near simultaneous failure of main support columns"


Having some intimate knowledge of explosives and their use, all controlled demolition include a "near simultaneous" cut of structural members at least if you want the structure to fall a certain way.

There is another reason, little known to most without experience, but it has to do with the mechanics of using explosives.

In short, the longer the time between detonations, the more likely there is to be a failure in the circuit. Meaning, simply, that the detonation system must be faster than the explosives they mean to detonate. These forces over a short amount of time are immense, and det cord can be severed easily, so the power running through the cord travels at a higher rate of speed than the explosive force, by in large.

This is a general and brief explanation.

The system here will not allow me to upload the full report, but if you are interested, IM me and I can email it to you.

 

[TopHook]

Someone please explain this one to me. I’ve never understood the meaning of it.

Insinuating you already know who or what race (only one race ) was behind the event without having to read what happened.

 

[weaponoffreedom]

Insinuating you already know who or what race was behind the event without having to read what happened.

Alright, so what do you think?

 

[TopHook]

Alright, so what do you think?

Our government. Duh

 

[weaponoffreedom]

Our government. Duh

I agree, as the primary puppeteer.