Russia is trying to “trick” us in to thinking being radiated is bad for us

[absoluteUnit]

I tend to agree with the Rooskies here though. I don’t carry the same journalistic integrity as the NYT but I wrote an FSF article on a similar topic:

A Possible Mechanism for Rogue Directed Energy Attacks

Last week, Fox News commented on "suspected directed energy attacks on CIA agents." See the video here: These events are being compared to an incident that happened in Cuba in 2017, in which US diplomats experienced a strange condition has come to be labelled as the "Havana Syndrome"...

thefreespeechforum.com

 

[quickfeet]

The US government fully supports the full irradiation of their citizens as long as the corporations say it is fine

 

[muddytumbo]

View attachment 26789

I tend to agree with the Rooskies here though. I don’t carry the same journalistic integrity as the NYT but I wrote an FSF article on a similar topic:

A Possible Mechanism for Rogue Directed Energy Attacks

Last week, Fox News commented on "suspected directed energy attacks on CIA agents." See the video here: These events are being compared to an incident that happened in Cuba in 2017, in which US diplomats experienced a strange condition has come to be labelled as the "Havana Syndrome"...

thefreespeechforum.com

I read your article, and I'm a bit confused. Power would affect amplitude and frequency, right? So if we want to increase frequency and amplitude, we would need a significant amount of power to do that, right? If I understand your article correctly, wouldn't that mean that people would be exposed to that energy required to produce these waves and that RF energy falls within the range that could potentially be harmful to humans? Sorry if I'm missing the mark here, but I'm trying to understand how 5G would be detrimental. This would be because 5G falls within a high RF frequency.

 

[absoluteUnit]

I read your article, and I'm a bit confused. Power would affect amplitude and frequency, right? So if we want to increase frequency and amplitude, we would need a significant amount of power to do that, right? If I understand your article correctly, wouldn't that mean that people would be exposed to that energy required to produce these waves and that RF energy falls within the range that could potentially be harmful to humans? Sorry if I'm missing the mark here, but I'm trying to understand how 5G would be detrimental. This would be because 5G falls within a high RF frequency.

Power is a product of (voltage) amplitude, but has nothing to do with frequency.

 

[muddytumbo]

Power is a product of (voltage) amplitude, but has nothing to do with frequency.

Will you elaborate more on how 5G is dangerous. I as a layman don't understand your article and how 5G are related.

 

[absoluteUnit]

Will you elaborate more on how 5G is dangerous. I as a layman don't understand your article and how 5G are related.

I’m not saying that 5G is dangerous explicitly. However there are some waveforms that are similar to 5G waveforms that HAVE proven to be dangerous to biological systems.

 

[Cre8ive]

View attachment 26789

I tend to agree with the Rooskies here though. I don’t carry the same journalistic integrity as the NYT but I wrote an FSF article on a similar topic:

A Possible Mechanism for Rogue Directed Energy Attacks

Last week, Fox News commented on "suspected directed energy attacks on CIA agents." See the video here: These events are being compared to an incident that happened in Cuba in 2017, in which US diplomats experienced a strange condition has come to be labelled as the "Havana Syndrome"...

thefreespeechforum.com

Note the word "suspected" - fake news. The constant drum beat of idiotic conspiracy theories when the most dangerous threat we face sits and shits in the oval orafice.