- Joined
- Jan 8, 2021
- Messages
- 1,764
Let's get an appraisal
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Why? Because the media tried to destroy him?Not sure how anyone can think that with the events that occurred during his presidency.
HMmmm thinking ttu means totally trans underneathPoll is invalid. There is no option for "OP is a faggot"
Why? Because the media tried to destroy him?
Look at our good friend George Bush...it's a show
Yeah, they gave Bush a hard time but they tried to take Trump out of office. Bush faced 1/10 the onslaught that Trump did.
A good script it was, a script it wasPlus it wasn't just the media. It was the entire deep state & intel agencies. The cabal, or whoever, used some of their biggest tools to try to get Trump out of office. Not something you do to somebody who's on your side.
He's cabal through and throughJesuit Zionist. Does it get any more cabalistic than that?
If he is a part of the Cabal then why did they try and remove him from office?He's cabal through and through
Though I don't think he was originally and perhaps a genuine adversary up until the late 80s/early 90s
Or maybe he was from the jump
Thought fred was with the John Birch Society
This is the best ive ever seen
The stronger the cabal looks opposed to him, the better he looks to usIf he is a part of the Cabal then why did they try and remove him from office?
Meh, not buying it at all.The stronger the cabal looks opposed to him, the better he looks to us
It's posturing
The elites have read Machiavelli and Sun Tzu
Yes but he drummed up zero support and was not the guy to have in place to sweep in covid worldMeh, not buying it at all.
Don realizes he needs the republican party and its organization just like the republican party needs him. Its not like he relented and took on their platform, its just the opposite in my opinion. He made his platform and forced the party to adopt him whether they liked it or not.
Don't you think the Neo cons would rather have a Jeb Bush whom they could control?
That's what polls are about....seeing where people are and then volleying back and forthWhy Post a fuckin poll if OP is going to argue every poster is wrong. What a fuckin loser.
Yes but he drummed up zero support and was not the guy to have in place to sweep in covid world
I think prez jeb would have actually United the country against the establishment or at least made the uniparty reality obvious to way more people
I think prez jeb would have actually United the country against the establishment
by being such an insufferable cuck...
LOL get lost troll
I was talking about Jeb who had zero support and wouldn't bring in the interest of the electorateNot sure what you are talking about. Trump drummed up zero support for what? He beat 15(?) other contestants in the 2016 republican primary. That is drumming up support.
Wasn't the guy in place to deal with the Covid world? He pushed back against deep state shit from the outset. He hated masks, was opposed to lockdowns longer than 2 weeks and eventually stopped listening to that dumbass Fauci.
Jeb is a huge pussy. He would have done whatever the deep state demanded that he do.
Now, please clap.
I was talking about Jeb who had zero support and wouldn't bring in the interest of the electorate
Trump deferred to fauci, totally embraced the vaxxes, and wore a mask
LOLTrump reluctantly wore a mask a couple times. He correctly deferred to Fauci the first couple weeks and then realized he was deep state and pushed him to the side.
Reasonable people can embrace the vaxes. They most likely are a net benefit for a subset of the population (elder). Nothing wrong with that.
Trump is far from deep state. Not sure which movie you are watching. They threw the kitchen sink at him and they are scared to death of his second term.
To be fair I laughed at your first paragraph too.So you want discussion and your response is "lol". Got it.
To be fair I laughed at your first paragraph too.
"Trump reluctantly wore a mask a couple times. He correctly deferred to Fauci the first couple weeks and then realized he was deep state and pushed him to the side."Which part am I off on?
Well, he hated the masks. Refused to be photographed wearing one for a long time and it drove the libs crazy."Trump reluctantly wore a mask a couple times. He correctly deferred to Fauci the first couple weeks and then realized he was deep state and pushed him to the side."
That part
Ya...a couple times and 2 weeks are not even close. Like, not even at all close. Also, putting fauci in charge in the first place was NOT the right thing to do.Well, he hated the masks. Refused to be photographed wearing one for a long time and it drove the libs crazy.
He did defer to Fauci the first couple weeks which in hindsight was wrong, but at the time was probably the right thing to do. You are president you have to rely on the advice of your government officials until you know they are wrong. Felt like thats what Trump did?
And he definitely pushed Fauci to the side after a while.
It was unserious imoSo you want discussion and your response is "lol". Got it.
I think you have your blindfolders on not aknowledging that the vaxes are beneficial to some. That’s not an honest argument imo.It was unserious imo
Fauci has been deep state for 40 years
Vaxxes are a net positive? That's just not a serious opinion. Is it a positive for health, privacy, individual rights?
Vaunted covid required no such response...outside of more fruits and vegetables
You don't have to pitch a perfect game but you can't be as "wrong" on the "pandemic" as "outsider" Trump was
Compared to whatI think you have your blindfolders on not aknowledging that the vaxes are beneficial to some. That’s not an honest argument imo.
If you are 75 years old the cost benefit is clear as day that the vax is beneficial.Compared to what
Injecting warp speed mystery potions for Coronavirus or vitamin D, ivermectin or apple juice?
What's the cost/benefit now and long term?
You don't even know what's in them let alone the information needed to calculate it's +-
Beneficial to the pharmaceutical companies yesIf you are 75 years old the cost benefit is clear as day that the vax is beneficial.
Beneficial to the pharmaceutical companies yes
Interestingly, you've fast forwarded to the age of 75. I'll just grant you that for the sake of conversation, why doesn't the medical apparatus make that their benchmark?
Please wear your mask for my safety btw