By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Yes, that's an important segment.I guess they meant that part about shall not be infringed.
@TJHall1I guess they meant that part about shall not be infringed.
Speeding laws don't stop all speeders, we should get rid of them. Laws against murdering people doesn't stop all murders, let's get rid of them.
You should switch to miracle whip.Speeding laws don't stop all speeders, we should get rid of them. Laws against murdering people doesn't stop all murders, let's get rid of them.
I like justice alito, but this is idiot logic.
Nothing wrong with miracle whip for certain uses. Pretty good on a BLT.You should switch to miracle whip.
Nothing in Alito's opinion bears any resemblance to this straw man. He is questioning the basis of Breyer's dissent, because the dissent lacks relevance.Speeding laws don't stop all speeders, we should get rid of them. Laws against murdering people doesn't stop all murders, let's get rid of them.
I like justice alito, but this is idiot logic in in what you just posted. I didn't read anything else he's written on the subject, just what you posted in the above.
I literally said I was only replying to the one single part that chicagofats posted.Nothing in Alito's opinion bears any resemblance to this straw man. He is questioning the basis of Breyer's dissent, because the dissent lacks relevance.
And you should be continually reminded of how dumb you were for doing that.I literally said I was only replying to the one single part that chicagofats posted.
"The New York law at issue in this case did not stop the perpetrator."And you should be continually reminded of how dumb you were for doing that.
Besides the vocal minority extreme left, the crazy people, who wants to actually take firearms from law abiding citizens?I'm surprised Roberts didn't join with the three libs to make it a 5-4 decision. Breyer, like the entire gun control movement, believes removing and restricting the "tools" from law abiding people will by default stop criminals from using the tools and crime itself.
You're right, it's not hard to understand that you're ignorant and make lazy arguments."The New York law at issue in this case did not stop the perpetrator."
That is what my post was in response to. This is not hard to understand.
The logic there is idiotic. At best.You're right, it's not hard to understand that you're ignorant and make lazy arguments.